Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results)
ordinary civic participation framed as excluded in favor of celebrity access
Portrays the situation as unstable and potentially disruptive to community expectations
Established political and civic institutions are portrayed as excluding voices like Pratt’s, privileging insider status
framing Lane Kiffin as an ally who restores connection and engagement
framing lack of fan and alumni connection as exclusionary failure
The public is framed as excluded from understanding or participating in high fashion
Community trust in football outcomes is in crisis due to controversial officiating
Framed as dangerous and exploitative
political elite portrayed as fractured and disconnected from public mandate
The suspect is framed as an adversary to the local community and its values
Employees are framed as being under threat from invasive monitoring
Local community solidarity with immigrant leader portrayed positively
framed as tense and emotionally charged without constructive dialogue
community cohesion portrayed as under strain due to divisive political rhetoric
U.S.-China relations framed in crisis mode over Taiwan
U.S.-China relationship framed as adversarial due to Taiwan tensions
International fans are framed as conditionally included, only granted access through exceptions
Local community portrayed as victimized and re-traumatized by external attention
Political conflict framed as national emergency threatening societal collapse
Local communities portrayed as resisting exclusion and demanding inclusion in AI development decisions
Fencing community portrayed as in ongoing crisis due to transgender inclusion debates
veterans and public are excluded from decision-making despite strong opposition
framed as being in cultural crisis
Broad voter outreach framed as inclusive, especially to disengaged or non-base voters
Neighbourhoods framed as in crisis due to fire-driven displacement and redevelopment
English players and fans subtly excluded from moral legitimacy in footballing narrative
Local communities are portrayed as vulnerable and excluded from safety due to external threats
International fans framed as excluded from U.S. hospitality
Public discourse on migration framed as harmful to social cohesion
Club internal dynamics framed as fractured and exclusionary, with conflict kept behind closed doors
framing football community as in crisis due to espionage scandal
Community is being portrayed as under attack and divided by hate
Canada-U.S. relationship framed as strained and alienating
portrays the subject as excluded or targeted
fans are excluded from meaningful influence over the game they love
portraying political elites as disconnected and internally fractured
Portraying a minor domestic habit as a serious relationship conflict requiring public judgment
Public dissent over Israel’s participation is marginalized by omission of geopolitical context
Community relations are framed as being in crisis due to controversy and perceived injustice
the event is framed as part of a broader societal crisis around addiction and celebrity
ambulance workers' concerns are acknowledged as legitimate within the broader community
Local communities and farmers are portrayed as included partners in conservation success
community portrayed as under moral threat, requiring collective response
Jewish communal relations framed as being in crisis due to political polarization
Flexible working is portrayed as beneficial for productivity, wellbeing, and talent retention
State’s social and economic environment framed as in crisis due to policy-driven exodus
Framing social integration in New Zealand as an ongoing crisis of belonging and identity for diasporic communities
Community trust is being undermined by leadership
US-China relationship framed as cooperative and personal alliance
Station staff are portrayed as living under strain due to noise and health risks, threatening their wellbeing
Adult involvement in youth sports framed as unwelcome and destructive, excluding parents from legitimate community roles
suggests Ong is being excluded from normal council functioning
Ennis’s actions are framed as promoting inclusion of marginalized groups
US-China relationship is framed as adversarial and strained, with both sides weakened
Framed as inherently unstable and crisis-ridden, driven by exploitation and moral failure
framed as exclusionary and socially divisive due to racial provocations
excludes local communities from decision-making narrative
Framed as strained between Mexican sovereignty and U.S. intervention
Foments division by framing political opponents as enemies to be fought
Alberta framed as included and valued within national unity
Society is framed as fractured and distrustful, undermining collective action
Framing romantic relationships as predatory and transactional, especially across gender and wealth lines
framed as risking exclusion of Indigenous communities and local groups from meaningful decision-making
portrayed as socially distant and exclusionary
Legal betting participants framed as unfairly excluded from tax fairness
Community relations are portrayed as being in crisis due to antisemitism and security failures
Romantic relationship framed as adversarial and dangerous
Relationship portrayed as corrupt and exploitative
The situation is framed as an ongoing crisis eroding staff goodwill and institutional trust
local community interests portrayed as excluded from decision-making
Community goodwill is portrayed as intrusive and unwelcome
Community relations within Gloriavale are framed as psychologically unsafe due to coercive practices
Community cohesion is framed as under threat due to political polarization
Framed as deteriorating between individuals across racial and sexual identity lines
Romantic relationships framed as being in crisis due to pornography
Highlighting exclusion and division within the team and fanbase
Immigrant communities are framed as already well-integrated and included
Community relations framed as under strain due to political polarization
Practitioners of conversion therapy framed as adversarial to LGBTQ+ individuals and society
Carl Radke slams West Wilson, Amanda Batula’s ‘uncomfortable’ PDA in shocking ‘Summer House’ episode
Romantic relationships portrayed as unstable and emotionally volatile
Incarcerated individuals and prison staff framed in a way that reinforces stigma and othering
Framing the sisters as empowered agents contributing to community rebuilding
Local community portrayed as excluded from decision-making, under threat from external actors
Social cohesion is portrayed as under threat from immigration
Trump voters framed as collectively guilty and morally excluded
frames racial history and campus diversity as a current cultural flashpoint
Ordinary Russians portrayed as excluded from reliable communication and autonomy
Community Relations portrayed as fractured and antagonistic due to fan behaviour and unproven allegations
Foreign nationals framed as excluded and targeted within South African society
Local humanitarian groups are portrayed as inclusive, advocating for compassion and solidarity with asylum seekers
Civilians, especially women and children, are framed as abandoned and excluded from protection
Fentanyl ingredients entering Canada via Vancouver en route to cartel-run drug labs, U.S. DEA boss …
Canadian institutions subtly excluded through contrast with U.S. urgency
Gloriavale's reconciliation efforts framed as ineffective and performative
Gloriavale leadership portrayed as untrustworthy due to insincere apology and historical concealment
Former members feel excluded by a vague and impersonal apology
Māori members within Gloriavale are portrayed as having been systematically marginalized, but now reclaiming belonging through cultural reconnection
Kitchen leadership framed as failing due to abuse and unprofessional conduct
Workplace environment portrayed as endangering staff
Framing women as vulnerable and excluded from safety due to individual criminal behavior
Local community division emphasized over routine development debate