Agenda Signals / Search

Search Agenda Signals

Search for subjects across all topics.

Downplays the seriousness of alleged sexual misconduct by centering the narrative on the accused

0 +
-5

Undermines complexity of victim experiences by asserting satisfaction without direct testimony

0 +
-3

Downplays seriousness of pending sexual assault allegations by centering athlete's eligibility

0 +
-3

Highlights sexual violence in a public, high-profile context, potentially contributing to a narrative of systemic athlete impunity or risk, though without broader statistical or institutional analysis.

0 +
-6

Downplays ethical concerns around consensual sexting during marriage as 'stupid' gossip

0 +
-4

Highlights domestic violence as a systemic issue enabled by institutions

0 +
-8

Frames the riots as a race-based pogrom fueled by historical amnesia and coordinated intimidation

0 +
-9

Frames victims as vulnerable and exploited, emphasizing gender and social marginalization to highlight moral failure of the perpetrator.

0 +
-6

Elevates victim courage and resilience, reframing shame as societal failure rather than personal burden

0 +
+9

Emphasizes the gravity and long-term nature of intimate partner abuse

0 +
-9

Minimizes the seriousness of sexual harassment allegations by declaring 'There was no sexual harassment' as fact

0 +
-6

Portrays drug-facilitated sexual assault as a grave, systemic societal ill requiring urgent attention

0 +
-9

Frames gun violence as morally repugnant and disruptive, through repeated attribution of emotional condemnation

0 +
-6

Portrays sexual violence as pervasive and deeply traumatic, emphasizing systemic betrayal and hidden networks.

0 +
-9

Frames gun violence as recurrent and geographically concentrated

0 +
-6

Portrays gun control advocacy as potentially infringing on Second Amendment rights, despite candidate’s claims of balance

0 +
-4

Frames political violence as a consequence of undemocratic power consolidation

0 +
-6

Portrays domestic violence as a serious, systemic issue linked to repeat offenders

0 +
-7

Portrays domestic violence as a widespread, morally urgent crisis within the NFL

0 +
-8

Frames the incident as part of a pattern of intimate partner violence

0 +
-4

Underemphasizes societal harm of sexual violence by focusing on logistical consequences for sports events

0 +
-6

Minimizes the societal gravity of rape allegations by centering sports impact over victim considerations

0 +
-6

Elevates sexual violence as a matter with serious institutional consequences

0 +
-7

Extends the concept of domestic violence to include political violence in the home

0 +
-5

Portrays allegations of sexual misconduct as credible and emphasizes institutional response

0 +
-7

Portrays sexual misconduct allegations as credible and emphasizes victim response and institutional action

0 +
-7

Frames the incident as a clear case of sexual misconduct, emphasizing institutional response over ongoing dispute

0 +
-6

Portrays sexual violence accusations as defining and disqualifying, emphasizing scandal over due process.

0 +
-8

Frames sexual violence allegations with gravity, potentially influencing public perception of the accused

0 +
-6

Frames the allegation of nonconsensual contact as part of a broader pattern of misconduct

0 +
-4

Portrays violence as an inevitable byproduct of fan culture, normalizing brutality in public spaces.

0 +
-8

Portrays allegations of nonconsensual contact as credible and part of a pattern of misconduct, reinforcing a narrative of moral decline.

0 +
-7

Portrays gun violence as senseless and pervasive, linked to youth and drug use

0 +
-8

Frames sexual violence as a widespread, systemic issue exacerbated by institutional neglect

0 +
-7

Frames gun violence as disruptive and destabilizing through sensory detail and ongoing threat

0 +
-4

Frames gun violence as an immediate, public threat requiring large-scale intervention

0 +
-4

Humanizing victims of state violence and affirming their dignity and right to remembrance

0 +
+9

Portrays gun violence as chaotic and endangering innocent crowds

0 +
-5

Portrays gun violence as chaotic and indiscriminate, especially in public gatherings

0 +
-7

Framing emphasizes the credibility of the allegation and institutional response, subtly reinforcing a narrative of misconduct without equal emphasis on contradiction or evidence challenges.

0 +
-6

Portrays racially motivated violence as systemic, organized, and ideologically driven rather than isolated.

0 +
-9

Framing emphasizes lack of empathy and inappropriate behavior in context of domestic tragedy

0 +
-7

Frames gang violence as a primary driver of urban insecurity, particularly tied to illicit mining

0 +
-7

Highlights risks of improper firearm storage through past tragedy

0 +
-4

Frames gun violence by police as preventable and excessive

0 +
-5

Frames domestic violence as severe and culminating in child murder

0 +
-7

Portrays domestic violence as inherently premeditated and cruel, emphasizing prosecutorial narrative of atrocity

0 +
-8

Highlights sexual violence as a systemic harm, focusing on victim courage and justice

0 +
-7

Gun violence is framed as a serious threat requiring urgent government action

0 +
-6

Portrays allegations of sexual misconduct as credible and institutionally validated

0 +
-7

Frames sexual violence as a systemic issue exacerbated by legal loopholes

0 +
+8

Highlights domestic violence as a context for the alleged murder, framing it as a serious but procedurally handled issue

0 +
-5

Suggests a threat to public safety through militarized lone-actor violence

0 +
-4

Depicts the act as ideologically motivated political violence, though without fully exploring the ideology

0 +
-6

Portrays the perpetrator as a calculated and dangerous threat to democratic institutions

0 +
-9

Portrays sexual violence as a serious and systemic issue requiring accountability

0 +
-7

Portrays domestic violence as sensational moral horror without context

0 +
-8

Presents gun violence as a tool of coercive control in domestic settings

0 +
-6

Portrays domestic violence as extreme and ritualized, amplifying fear

0 +
-8

Portrays domestic violence allegations as credible and central to custody decisions

0 +
+7

Highlights gun violence as a systemic risk when power is misused

0 +
-6

Highlights severity of abuse allegations without neutral distancing

0 +
-6

Strongly condemns xenophobic violence and positions it as illegitimate and externally incited

0 +
-8

Portrays domestic-style violence and arson against families as widespread and cowardly, emphasizing victimization of children and non-combatants

0 +
-8

Framed as an ongoing pattern of misconduct requiring systemic legal response

0 +
-3

Minimizes severity of domestic violence allegations through celebrity framing

0 +
-3

Mischaracterizes politically targeted home invasion as domestic-style attack

0 +
-6

Extends the definition of domestic violence by including animal cruelty and family trauma

0 +
-3

Highlights the fragility and risks within systems meant to protect victims of domestic violence

0 +
-6

Elevates survivors’ moral authority and frames advocacy for transparency as ethically necessary

0 +
+7

Frames domestic violence as a premeditated, obsessive, and physically extreme act, reinforcing a narrative of predatory male violence

0 +
-7

Emphasizes severity and scale of sexual violence to reinforce moral condemnation

0 +
-7

Frames settler violence as systematic and state-tolerated intimidation campaign

0 +
-7

Portrays domestic violence as a severe, preventable tragedy due to systemic and personal underestimation of abusers

0 +
-8

Frames 3D-printed guns as a growing threat to public safety

0 +
-6

Strongly frames the unrest as racist attacks on minorities rather than mutual conflict

0 +
-8

Portrays domestic violence as pervasive and emotionally destructive, emphasizing victim suffering and abuser cruelty

0 +
-8

Portrays gun violence as a significant domestic issue requiring policy attention

0 +
-4

Promotes empathy, visibility, and moral duty toward survivors of sexual abuse

0 +
+8

Frames gun violence as a disruptive and senseless threat to community events

0 +
-7

Frames gun violence as disruptive and traumatic, particularly in a peaceful community setting

0 +
-6

Highlights the role of firearms in enabling lethal domestic violence

0 +
+6

Portrays domestic violence as a systemic and urgent public health issue requiring attention

0 +
+7

Frames gun violence as intrinsically tied to domestic conflict and accessible firearms

0 +
+6

Portrays domestic violence as a systemic and urgent public safety issue linked to gun violence

0 +
+7

Emphasises severity and pervasiveness of domestic abuse in the relationship

0 +
-3

Highlights domestic betrayal and prolonged abuse within intimate relationships

0 +
-8

Frames domestic violence allegations as being minimized when not fitting 'classic' abuse narratives

0 +
-6

Positions victims as central, dignified voices deserving of artistic and public platforms

0 +
+8

Frames youth violence as senseless and driven by easily accessible tools, emphasizing victim vulnerability

0 +
-7

Portrays knife violence as shockingly accessible and trivialized through consumer culture

0 +
-8

Portrays domestic violence as occurring without sufficient qualification or balance

0 +
-8

Portrays domestic violence as a systemic and inevitable outcome in abusive relationships

0 +
-8

Depicts victimhood through a lens of extreme physical suffering

0 +
-5

Portrays domestic violence as exceptionally brutal and visually disturbing

0 +
-6

Frames domestic violence as a severe, criminalized act linked to a dangerous individual history

0 +
-8

Portrays domestic violence as unidirectional female-perpetrated abuse, contradicting common narratives

0 +
-7

Highlights survivors of domestic violence as at risk of being excluded from essential housing support

0 +
+8