Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results)
Public health system portrayed as failing to protect newborns due to inconsistent screening access
Government fiscal management is framed as reaching a tipping point and unable to absorb further shocks
Portraying online reaction as a chaotic moral panic
portrays the GOP as internally divided and dysfunctional
Public reaction framed as mildly destabilizing or absurd
Supervised consumption sites are framed as beneficial to individuals and communities
Public health is portrayed as endangered by policy decisions
Ratcliffe’s public statements are framed as socially unacceptable and delegitimised
Framed as wasteful and destructive due to war costs
framed as morally insensitive and exploitative
Framed as an adversarial force to women's rights
Portrayed as failing to provide real medical support
framed as being in cultural crisis over representation and identity
Public health is portrayed as stable and under control, not under widespread threat
historical transparency and public understanding framed as essential to democratic discourse
Framing pundit-player exchange as damaging to respectful debate
Party portrayed as purging dissenters, framing disloyalty to Trump as grounds for exclusion
Public spending on RTÉ is implicitly framed as potentially wasteful or mismanaged
Diplomatic engagement with China portrayed as ideologically suspect or naive
framing public discourse as distorted and punitive toward celebrities
framed as potentially compromised by leadership lacking relevant expertise
Public discourse around child marriage is framed as trivialized and lacking legitimacy
Framing government spending on childcare as wasteful and corrupting
Framing current healthcare access as a crisis requiring urgent expansion
Framing public health expansion as highly beneficial to society
portrayed as corrupt and irresponsible due to perceived ableist remarks and inadequate response
Public funding of RTÉ is implicitly framed as being misused
MAHA movement and reform voices portrayed as being excluded from power despite initial influence
Public health institutions portrayed as unstable and endangering public trust
framing DEI as a cultural emergency requiring state intervention
Public health is portrayed as under severe threat from ultra-processed foods
Backtalker and intersectionality framed as beneficial to public understanding of race and gender
Public health access framed as under threat from legal restrictions
Access to abortion care framed as legally precarious despite medical consensus
Public discourse framed as descending into mockery rather than serious engagement
Court personnel framed as corrupt or untrustworthy due to Hill's actions
portrayed as broken and fueling division
Public access to care still portrayed as under threat
Public health context is implied as unstable due to off-label ketamine use and access gaps
Public discourse is framed as consumed by moral outrage and true-crime sensationalism
Public investment in housing regeneration framed as inefficient and stalled
Public spending on animal shelters is framed as corrupt and misused for private profit
Public discourse framed as dangerously polarised and escalating toward division
Public health response to dementia framed as insufficiently protective
Diplomacy reframed as spectacle and cultural clash, elevating triviality to crisis-level drama
portrayed as in crisis due to rising hatred and division
A public health approach is framed as the only ethical and evidence-based path forward
The legal outcome is framed as a crisis-level event in public conversation
Public discourse around celebrities framed as invasive and unsafe
Framing youth identity formation as vulnerable to manipulation by tobacco marketing
Public figures framed as adversaries to public morality due to personal conduct
Public discourse portrayed as descending into mockery and moral panic over personal behavior
The case is framed as a sensational, crisis-level public spectacle
Government cost-saving measures framed as undermining programme effectiveness
government framing of programme as more fiscally responsible and efficient
Societal approaches to sexual health are portrayed as failing women by reducing sex to obligation or economic stress relief
Modern public narratives about declining sex are framed as shallow and morally prescriptive
Public discourse portrayed as deteriorating and emotionally draining
methamphetamine use framed as contributing to a crisis-level threat to public safety
The use of 'Alligator Alcatraz' as a nickname lends a sensational and punitive tone to public discourse around immigration detention
Legal process portrayed in crisis due to institutional breakdown
Current emergency response to dementia framed as harmful
Framed as wasteful or questionable use of public funds
Frames infrastructure funding as at risk due to proposed tax suspension
Public health system portrayed as under pressure from misinformation
Government infrastructure funding is framed as at risk due to fiscal trade-offs
Public fascination with true crime portrayed as amplifying scrutiny of justice
Portrayed as a harmful diversion of public assets from public benefit
Public health response to body image issues framed as failing due to lack of expert input
Public commentary on body image framed as illegitimate and harmful when critical of thinness
Executive order framed as imposing harmful administrative costs on public institutions
Republican Party is framed as an adversarial force to be blocked
Official narratives framed as untrustworthy, favoring alternative accounts
Framed as wasteful and misaligned with public interest
Journalistic discourse undermined by promotional content and lack of sourcing
Public health is framed as under threat from industrial emissions
Corporate and government narratives are framed as untrustworthy, involving 'spin'
Defendant's voice excluded and ridiculed in public narrative
Public spending on homelessness is portrayed as harmful and wasteful
Public discourse framed as descending into mockery and tabloid frenzy
Public reaction is framed as an irrational crisis rather than a stable democratic debate
Framing the incident as a cultural emergency in LA
Framed as endangered by appointment of figure who opposes scientific consensus
Public spending on the war is framed as wasteful and damaging to national priorities
Public discourse portrayed as deteriorating due to AI-generated political noise
Data collection on sexual orientation is framed as beneficial for equitable allocation of public resources
Public health leadership framed as causing direct harm to individuals
Republican Party framed as hostile to internal dissent and democratic principles
Racial diversity in medicine framed as beneficial to patient outcomes
Public health portrayed as under threat due to psychological and social factors
Public health system portrayed as endangered by blackouts
Public behavior framed as descending into crisis due to celebrity influence
Bureaucratic agencies are framed as untrustworthy or obstructive in fire risk management
Public health system in Sudan portrayed as failing to meet the needs of malnourished children
Celebrity-media relationship framed as ongoing crisis
Public funding of monarchy questioned in terms of value and opportunity cost
Public health access to abortion medication framed as precarious and under legal threat
Compassion and empathy systematically excluded and ridiculed as dangerous
Federal infrastructure spending portrayed as uneven and ineffective for WA
Republican Party framed as a partisan adversary using aggressive tactics to undermine fair representation