Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results)
framed as leading to harmful outcomes through over-accommodation
US is framed as an unwelcoming adversary nation ahead of a global event
Immigration policy is framed as inefficient and counterproductive to national interests
framed as a hostile threat to be stamped out
Immigration enforcement framed as adversarial and punitive toward migrants
Immigration policy portrayed as endangering individuals' rights and safety
US-brokered truce efforts framed as ineffective and failing
Immigration-related activism is framed as adversarial and a source of societal conflict
Palestinians are framed as excluded, displaced, and abandoned
framed as enabling and legitimizing Israel's regional security role
Framed as overreaching and illegitimately interfering in UK domestic policy
Immigration Policy framed as potentially corrupt due to leadership appointment with private prison ties and omitted controversy
UK framed as a diminished, less influential global actor
framed as creating harm through stricter, punitive measures
US immigration enforcement framed as adversarial to migrants
immigration policy portrayed as dysfunctional and unsustainable
immigration policy framed as endangering migrants
Immigration framed with adversarial undertones in parts of discourse
portrayed as reactive and weakened on the global stage
US international posture framed as untrustworthy for global travelers
African fans portrayed as being excluded by US immigration rules
Immigration policy framed as adversarial to international inclusion
Framed as assertive and dominant in superpower diplomacy
framed as operating outside international legal norms
misapplying migration-related framing to racial hiring policies
Anti-immigration stance is framed as adversarial to national inclusivity and institutional values
Framed as creating strategic dependency on an adversary
Portrayed as hostile and aggressive toward Iran
US framed as dominant and assertive toward China
US foreign policy framed as disruptive and aggressive
US portrayed as an aggressive, destabilizing force in the region
Foreign institutions framed as adversarial to Philippine sovereignty
framed as harmful and driven by political expediency rather than compassion
Framing climate migrants as unwelcome and ridiculed
U.S. foreign policy framed as legally dubious and unaccountable
framed as being in crisis due to volatile relations with the Vatican and Iran
boycott movement framed as exclusionary of Israel
North Carolina school ignored complaints about trans student staring at girls in locker room: filing
Framing transgender students as intruders in gender-specific spaces
US foreign policy is framed as failing due to strategic overreach and self-inflicted setbacks
US foreign policy framed as confrontational and destabilizing
Framing international justice as hostile interference
international justice system implicitly questioned through misrepresentation
US diplomatic actions are framed as antagonistic and unjust
France is framed as an adversarial, paternalistic power rather than an equal partner
US diplomatic efforts implied to be ineffective despite involvement
Framed as endangering migrants through use of Guantánamo
Framed as hostile and aggressive toward Cuba
US foreign policy portrayed as weakened and reactive
Infrastructure and policy responses are framed as effective and capable of addressing environmental challenges
Economic activity in New Orleans is portrayed as beneficial and essential to national interests
US portrayed as confrontational and destabilizing in its approach to Iran
Immigration is framed as a stable, manageable issue rather than a crisis
Immigration is framed as not posing a threat to social stability
US foreign policy framed as confrontational and reactive
US leadership under Trump is implicitly framed as illegitimate due to moral equivalence with Farage’s ambitions
US portrayed as an aggressive adversary in its dealings with Iran, undermining diplomatic credibility
Portrayed as failing due to lack of public justification and mounting war costs
portrayed as confrontational and self-interested in regional conflicts
US diplomacy portrayed as performative and reliant on symbolism over substance
US foreign policy framed as hostile and unilateral
No direct signal on immigration policy — score is invalid due to misalignment
US diplomatic efforts framed as ineffective and stalled
U.S. policy toward Ukraine framed as inconsistent and in flux due to political infighting
Framed as potentially adversarial to Canadian sovereignty through intervention
US diplomacy portrayed as ineffective, reliant on pageantry over substance
framed as enabling hostile exploitation by outsiders
U.S. foreign policy portrayed as incoherent, reactive, and failing under Trump
US diplomatic role implied as compromised or ineffective
International legal action framed as hostile foreign interference
Portrays US-linked foreign institutions as hostile to Philippine sovereignty
Framed as cooperative and diplomatically engaged with China
US foreign policy framed as hostile and reckless under Trump's leadership
Framing 'move-on' powers as harmful, contributing to displacement of homeless people across cities
domestic economic transformation framed as contributing to national instability
framed as adversarial and unresponsive to domestic consequences
US foreign policy portrayed as reactive and compromised by military overextension
Ottawa framed as adversarial toward Quebec’s political interests
Implies US foreign policy is driven by unilateral obsession, not alliance or global stability
Implying Western-backed institutions oppose Philippine sovereignty
Immigration policy framed as adversarial and dangerous
Black residents framed as being excluded from political representation
US foreign policy framed as crisis-driven and reactive
U.S. foreign policy is framed as potentially transactional and unreliable, subject to personal diplomacy over institutional commitments
Frames US foreign policy as an aggressive, destabilizing force contributing to global economic instability
US actions portrayed without accountability
The closure is framed as an urgent response to systemic failures, not routine policy adjustment
Immigration enforcement is framed as harmful due to inhumane conditions and financial waste
Immigration Policy is framed as excluding and targeting migrants and refugees
Framing the U.S. as a conditional ally demanding reciprocity rather than an unconditional partner
Immigration policy is framed as endangering human lives and dignity
Trade policy is portrayed as being in disarray due to legal reversals
U.S.-brokered diplomacy framed as ineffective amid ongoing violence
U.S. immigration practices are framed as illegitimate by international standards
U.S. immigration enforcement is framed as adversarial toward immigrants
Immigration enforcement is portrayed as endangering vulnerable individuals
Domestic policy enforcement framed as a confrontation with certain states, using adversarial language
US trade policy framed as adversarial toward trading partners
Opening markets to Chinese firms framed as an illegitimate threat to sovereignty and self-reliance
Framed as covertly hostile through 'deep state' actions related to pandemic origins
Immigration enforcement is framed as a legitimate authority confronting hostile actors