Influencers
Date Range
Score Range
RNZ : Fears for safety as influencers push synthetic peptides
Social media influencers are portrayed as untrustworthy actors promoting dangerous unregulated substances
The article underscores that influencers lack medical training and use disclaimers to evade accountability, while actively promoting unapproved drugs. Experts call for them to be 'brought to heel' and held accountable.
“These people should be brought to heel and to be accountable for peddling substances which are unregulated and unapproved.”
New York Post : Influencer trashed for apparently manipulating photo to flatten belly — with bizarre result: ‘OMG this …
Influencers framed as adversaries to authenticity and honest body representation
Narrative framing constructs influencers as antagonists in a moral drama, opposing public expectations of truth and natural appearance.
“The bizarre body-editing drama is just the latest example of social media’s increasingly twisted relationship with reality.”
New York Post : Influencer trashed for apparently manipulating photo to flatten belly — with bizarre result: ‘OMG this …
Influencers portrayed as deceptive and dishonest in their image presentation
The article frames the influencer's actions as morally questionable and deceptive, using anonymous online criticism to amplify claims of dishonesty without direct confirmation or balance.
“People are saying you edited your photos in a deceptive way”
Daily Mail : The dangerous lies peddled by nourishherbody: He's the 'scientist' watched by millions and paid thousands …
Influencers are framed as lacking legitimacy when dispensing medical advice
Loaded language and editorializing are used to delegitimize Preuss’s authority, emphasizing lack of credentials and use of aliases.
“I can reveal that ‘nourishherbody’ is not registered as a nutritionist in the UK, despite presenting himself as one – and experts are raising serious concerns about the content, branding it ‘damaging’ and ‘dangerous’.”
New York Post : Influencer James Charles torched after blasting canned Spirit Airlines staffer as ‘lazy piece of s–t’ …
Influencers framed as hostile and exploitative toward vulnerable followers
Sensationalism and editorializing position influencers as antagonists who abuse their platform to shame struggling individuals, especially through the use of profanity-laden quotes and the term 'torched'.
“Influencer James Charles torched after blasting canned Spirit Airlines staffer as ‘lazy piece of s–t’ over donation plea”
New York Post : Online pressures turn Gen Z girls into shopping machines, more like products than people: book
Influencers are framed as adversarial figures who profit from young people’s fear and confusion rather than offering genuine support
Cherry-picking and loaded language depict influencers as predatory actors in mental health and romance spaces, reinforcing a cynical view of digital mentorship.
“where the only guidance they get comes from dating influencers profiting from their fear and confusion”
news.com.au : Influencer, 29, has very expensive hens party – but didn’t pay for it
Influencers are portrayed as ethically compromised for monetizing personal life events
The article frames the influencer's free hens party as a scandalous exchange, using loaded language like 'angered the internet' and 'hijacking' to imply moral transgression rather than routine sponsorship.
“A bride-to-be who scored an entirely free hens party worth thousands of dollars has angered the internet after it emerged a beauty brand paid for the week-long trip for her and 16 guests.”
news.com.au : AFL star’s fiancee slammed over ‘tone deaf’ Anzac Day fashion post
Influencers portrayed as commercially exploitative and lacking integrity on solemn occasions
The article emphasizes outrage over the 'tone deaf' nature of a sponsored post on Anzac Day, using loaded language and highlighting accusations of monetization during a day of national reflection. This frames influencers as prioritizing brand deals over cultural sensitivity.
“some calling it “tone deaf””
New York Post : How 5 looksmaxxing trends can destroy your health and make you ugly
Looksmaxxing influencers are framed as untrustworthy figures promoting dangerous, unregulated practices
Despite not explicitly encouraging dangerous acts, influencers like Clavicular are presented as having indirect responsibility due to lack of control over follower behavior.
“While the New Jersey native doesn’t encourage followers to attempt many of the techniques he shares, online influence rarely translates into control over real-world behavior.”
New York Post : Coachella tickets ‘scam’ sparks influencer war as alleged victims post spicy text messages
Influencers framed as sources of drama and deception
The article uses sensationalist language and emphasizes viral conflict to portray influencers as embroiled in a dangerous, untrustworthy social media spectacle.
“A viral video blowing up online is exposing a messy web of alleged ticket fraud involving influencers — and the internet is absolutely loving the drama.”