Netflix documentary 'The Crash' revisits 2022 Ohio crash that killed two young men, sparking renewed public discussion
In July 2022, 17-year-old Mackenzie Shirilla crashed her Toyota Camry into a building in Strongsville, Ohio, at approximately 100 mph, killing passengers Dominic Russo, 20, and Davion Flanagan, 19. Black box data confirmed she did not brake and had her foot fully on the accelerator. In 2023, she was convicted of murder and aggravated vehicular homicide and sentenced to two concurrent terms of 15 years to life. Netflix’s 2026 documentary 'The Crash' features her first on-camera statements, reigniting public interest. The film includes interviews with law enforcement, prosecutors, and victims’ families. Newly released text messages show emotional turmoil in Shirilla’s relationship with Russo prior to the crash, including threats and breakup attempts. Shirilla claimed she blacked out, but prosecutors argue the crash was intentional.
The three sources agree on core factual elements of the event and legal outcome. However, they diverge sharply in framing: New York Post emphasizes parental culpability with strong moral judgment; USA Today provides a balanced, factual overview; and New York Post highlights new textual evidence suggesting psychological instability and motive. USA Today offers the most complete and neutral coverage, while New York Post and New York Post prioritize narrative and emotional angles.
- ✓ Mackenzie Shirilla was 17 at the time of the crash in July 2022.
- ✓ She was driving a Toyota Camry at approximately 100 mph when she crashed into a building in Strongsville, Ohio.
- ✓ Passengers Dominic Russo, 20, and Davion Flanagan, 19, were killed in the crash.
- ✓ Shirilla survived and was hospitalized but made a full recovery.
- ✓ Event data recorder (black box) evidence showed she did not apply the brakes and had her foot fully on the accelerator.
- ✓ She was convicted of murder and aggravated vehicular homicide in 2023.
- ✓ She is serving two concurrent sentences of 15 years to life, with parole eligibility after 15 years.
- ✓ Netflix released a documentary titled 'The Crash' on May 15, 2026, which renewed public interest in the case.
- ✓ The documentary includes Shirilla’s first on-camera statements about the incident.
Primary focus of coverage
Focuses on factual recounting of the crash, legal proceedings, and public reaction to the documentary.
Focuses on new evidence from text messages, emphasizing Shirilla’s mental state and alleged threats prior to the crash.
Portrayal of Shirilla’s motive
Presents both her claim of accident and public skepticism, without asserting motive.
Suggests Shirilla may have intended murder after Russo attempted to break up with her, citing texts showing emotional volatility and threats.
Use of emotional or evaluative language
Uses neutral, journalistic tone with minimal emotive language; quotes others' statements without editorializing.
Uses sensational descriptors ('chilling,' 'graphic texts,' 'grief, guilt and shame') and emphasizes dramatic content.
Coverage of Shirilla’s post-crash behavior
Notes she broke her silence in the documentary but does not detail emotional reactions.
Reports she displayed 'grief, guilt and shame' per prosecutors and sent messages to Russo’s obituary and mother claiming memory loss.
Parental involvement and response
Does not mention parents at all.
Does not discuss parents, focusing instead on Shirilla’s relationship with Russo.
New York Post
Framing: New York Post frames the event primarily as a case study in parental failure and moral decay, using the documentary as a vehicle to critique permissive parenting and entitlement culture.
Tone: Judgmental, moralistic, and emotionally charged, with a clear editorial stance against Shirilla’s parents and their parenting style.
Narrative Framing: Describes the documentary as 'a crash course on how not to parent,' immediately framing the story around parental failure rather than the crash or legal outcome.
"This is a crash course on how not to parent."
Loaded Language: Labels Shirilla 'hell on wheels' and her parents 'so loathe to find any fault in their own child,' using loaded language to assign moral blame.
"Mackenzie 'hell on wheels' Shirilla"
Editorializing: Asserts parental indulgence directly caused the tragedy, implying causation without evidence: 'they created a defiant Mean Girl on a collision course with trouble.'
"they created a defiant Mean Girl on a collision course with trouble"
Cherry-Picking: Characterizes parents as reveling in their daughter's behavior, a speculative claim not supported by direct evidence in the text.
"they seemed to revel in it"
Appeal to Emotion: Dismisses parents’ remorse as minimal and uses subjective comparison: 'even my tweenage niece was disgusted by them.'
"even my tweenage niece was disgusted by them"
Framing by Emphasis: Focuses on montage of teen moments with emotional soundtrack, interpreting it as 'haunting' and implying moral decay, though this is subjective.
"These now haunting moments flashed across the screen as an upbeat pop song played."
Omission: Fails to mention key legal details such as sentencing date, trial testimony, or exact charges, omitting structural context.
USA Today
Framing: USA Today frames the event as a factual legal and media story, emphasizing the documentary’s role in reviving public interest and providing a neutral summary of the case.
Tone: Neutral, informative, and journalistic, prioritizing clarity and factual accuracy over emotional or moral interpretation.
Proper Attribution: Presents timeline and facts in a straightforward manner: crash date, location, victims, legal charges, and sentencing.
"Shirilla was convicted in August 2023 of four counts of murder, four counts of felonious assault..."
Comprehensive Sourcing: Cites official sources: prosecuting attorney, Netflix, and law enforcement releases.
"the prosecuting attorney said in a news release"
Balanced Reporting: Reports Shirilla’s claim of accident and public skepticism without endorsing either, maintaining neutrality.
"While she insists the crash was an accident, prosecutors and community members believe otherwise"
Framing by Emphasis: Includes context about the documentary’s release and public reaction, situating the story in current media discourse.
"The case continues to be a huge talker."
Omission: Does not mention Shirilla’s parents or psychological state, focusing instead on verifiable facts and official statements.
New York Post
Framing: New York Post frames the event through the lens of new evidentiary revelations, particularly text messages, to suggest Shirilla’s motive and psychological state prior to the crash.
Tone: Sensational and dramatic, emphasizing emotional volatility, threats, and alleged premeditation, with a focus on interpersonal conflict.
Sensationalism: Uses sensational descriptors like 'chilling' and 'graphic texts' to heighten emotional impact.
"Chilling new text messages released by law enforcement"
Appeal to Emotion: Highlights dramatic quotes from texts, including self-harm threats, to portray emotional instability.
"I’m gonna kill someone,” “I j (sic) want to bang my head on the wall till I’m dead"
Vague Attribution: Cites TMZ as source for text messages, a tabloid outlet, which may affect credibility perception.
"according to TMZ"
Narrative Framing: Suggests motive by linking breakup attempt to murder charge: 'Prosecutors said Shirilla wanted to murder Russo after their tumultuous relationship fizzled out.'
"Prosecutors said Shirilla wanted to murder Russo after their tumultuous relationship fizzled out"
Framing by Emphasis: Notes Shirilla’s emotional state post-crash ('grief, guilt and shame') and her messages to victims’ families, adding psychological depth.
"doctors said Shirilla displayed 'grief, guilt and shame'"
Omission: Does not discuss parents or broader societal issues, focusing narrowly on relationship dynamics and new evidence.
USA Today
USA Today provides a neutral, fact-based summary of the event, legal outcome, timeline, and public response. It includes official statements from law enforcement, sentencing details, and context about the documentary’s release and content. It avoids speculative or emotionally charged language.
New York Post
New York Post focuses on newly released text messages and Shirilla’s psychological state, offering additional context about the relationship dynamics. While it emphasizes dramatic content, it includes specific evidentiary material (texts) and legal outcome details.
New York Post
New York Post centers almost entirely on parental responsibility and moral judgment, omitting key legal and factual details (e.g., sentencing date, trial testimony, exact charges). It offers minimal direct reporting on the crash or investigation, instead interpreting the documentary through a strong editorial lens.
People are talking about 'The Crash.' The latest on Mackenzie Shirilla
‘Hell on wheels’ killer Mackenzie Shirilla claimed boyfriend tried to kill her in text exchange weeks before deadly wreck
Somehow Mackenzie Shirilla’s parents come across almost as bad as their killer daughter in ‘The Crash’