Documentary Revisits Brexit Era with Irreverent Tone, Sparking Debate Over Political Accountability and Media Ethics
The two-part BBC documentary 'Brexit: A Very British Civil War' examines the period between the 2015 general election and the Brexit referendum through a series of interviews with key political figures. It emphasizes personal anecdotes and internal conflicts among Leave and Remain campaigners, portraying the era as marked by ambition, chaos, and ideological inconsistency. While the film is praised for its narrative energy, critics debate whether its humorous, irreverent tone is appropriate given the long-term consequences of Brexit. The documentary briefly touches on concerns about Northern Ireland’s peace process, as raised by figures like Tony Blair and John Major, and contrasts the political cultures of the UK and Ireland. Overall, it presents Brexit less as a policy debate and more as a drama of personal and institutional failure.
While both sources cover the same documentary and agree on its irreverent tone and focus on personal anecdotes, they diverge significantly in their interpretive frameworks. Irish Times uses the documentary as a vehicle for cultural and political critique, emphasizing elite detachment and drawing moral contrasts. The Guardian focuses on the ethics of representation, questioning whether such a serious topic should be entertaining. Irish Times provides a more complete and contextually rich analysis.
- ✓ Both sources agree that the documentary 'Brexit: A Very British Civil War' is a retrospective on the Brexit campaign period, focusing on key political figures such as Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage, and David Cameron.
- ✓ Both note the irreverent, anecdotal tone of the documentary and highlight specific humorous moments, such as Johnson’s tennis match with Cameron and Farage’s recollections of political infighting.
- ✓ Both sources agree that the documentary is structured around talking-head interviews and emphasizes personal narratives over policy analysis.
- ✓ Both acknowledge the long-term negative consequences of Brexit, referring to a decade of political and social fallout.
Tone of critique
Critiques the British political class as fundamentally unserious and self-serving, using moral and cultural contrast with Ireland to reinforce this.
Critiques the documentary’s tone for being too entertaining, raising ethical concerns about laughing at serious political events.
Use of humor
Presents humor as a justified lens to expose the absurdity of elite politics.
Expresses discomfort with humor, questioning whether such a topic should be 'a hoot'.
Geopolitical comparison
Explicitly compares British politics unfavorably with Irish politics, elevating the latter.
Makes no mention of Ireland or comparative governance models.
Mention of Northern Ireland
Notes the documentary’s brief mention of Northern Ireland peace concerns via Blair and Major.
Does not reference Northern Ireland or the peace process at all.
Irish Times
Framing: Irish Times frames the documentary 'Brexit: A Very British Civil War' as a damning critique of Britain’s political elite, using the Brexit saga to highlight the absurdity and detachment of ruling-class figures. It positions Brexit as a self-serving political farce driven by personal ambition and ideological vacuity, contrasting it negatively with Irish politics, which—despite its parochialism—is presented as more grounded and accountable.
Tone: Sardonic, critical, and morally judgmental. The tone leans into irony and cultural comparison, expressing disdain for the British political class while subtly valorizing the Irish political model as comparatively stable and practical.
Framing by Emphasis: Irish Times emphasizes the personal quirks and performative nature of politicians (e.g., 'perma-smirking Boris Johnson', 'cycled in his sandals') to diminish their seriousness and underscore their detachment from public consequences.
"What a rogues’ gallery it is – from the perma-smirking Boris Johnson to the aloof former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, a man who cycled in his sandals while Rome figuratively burned."
Appeal to Emotion: Evokes gratitude for Irish politics by contrasting it with the 'ghastly portrait' of British elites, using emotional relief as a rhetorical device.
"If nothing else, it achieves the remarkable feat of making you grateful for parish-pump Irish politics and 'only in Ireland' characters such as the Healy-Raes."
Loaded Language: Uses emotionally charged, pejorative terms like 'ghastly', 'lark', and 'debacle' to frame Brexit as a frivolous disaster caused by irresponsible leaders.
"the comedy that keeps on giving, the debacle that keeps on taking"
Omission: Fails to include any voices defending Brexit or detailing its perceived benefits, even from Leave supporters, suggesting a one-sided portrayal of the event as universally regrettable.
"Nobody interviewed has anything at all to say about the benefits of Brexit."
Vague Attribution: References Irish figures like the Healy-Raes without explanation, assuming reader familiarity and reinforcing a cultural in-group perspective.
"characters such as the Healy-Raes"
Narrative Framing: Positions the documentary as a cautionary tale about elite incompetence, using the Brexit process as a morality play rather than a policy debate.
"British politics often resembles a bunch of poshos having a bun-fight while ordinary people live with the consequences."
The Guardian
Framing: The Guardian frames the documentary as an entertaining but ethically questionable retrospective that revels in the absurdity of Brexit politics. It acknowledges the gravity of Brexit’s consequences but focuses on the documentary’s tone—its humor and irreverence—as a central tension, questioning whether such a serious topic should be treated as comedic or entertaining.
Tone: Ambivalent, skeptical, and self-reflective. The tone expresses discomfort with the entertainment value of the documentary while simultaneously acknowledging its narrative appeal and stylistic effectiveness.
Framing by Emphasis: Highlights the contradiction between the serious consequences of Brexit and the documentary’s humorous presentation, centering the critique on tone rather than policy.
"Let’s get one thing straight immediately: no documentary about Brexit should be this much of a hoot."
Appeal to Emotion: Evokes dread and unease about Brexit’s long-term impact ('managed decline', 'mould') to contrast with the lightheartedness of the documentary.
"The dread many felt when the referendum result came in – a fear that reactionary populism was on the rise and Britain was entering an era of managed decline – has only bloomed like mould in the intervening decade."
Editorializing: Interjects personal judgment about what is appropriate in political storytelling ('No thanks') when discussing laughter at political figures' anecdotes.
"Tittering as Boris Johnson blathers about losing a tennis match to David Cameron...? No thanks."
Sensationalism: Uses exaggerated language like 'blasted with Brexit-flavoured juice' to dramatize the documentary’s style and intensity.
"From the off we’re blasted with Brexit-flavoured juice."
Cherry-Picking: Selects the most absurd or humorous anecdotes (e.g., Johnson denying ambition, Farage imitating an Irish accent) to emphasize the documentary’s focus on spectacle over substance.
"Nigel Farage as he reminisces about tensions between Dominic Cummings and Arron Banks"
Balanced Reporting: Acknowledges the documentary’s narrative strengths ('difficult to resist') while critiquing its ethical tone, creating a more nuanced perspective.
"Still, there is something extremely difficult to resist about Brexit: A Very British Civil War"
Irish Times
Provides broader context, including geopolitical comparisons, mentions of Northern Ireland, and a critique of political culture. Offers more thematic depth and external reference points.
The Guardian
Focuses narrowly on the documentary’s tone and narrative style. While perceptive about media ethics, it omits key contextual elements like Ireland and the peace process.
No related content
Brexit: A Very British Civil War review – TV has no right to be this much of a hoot
Brexit - A Very British Civil War review: Ghastly portrait of ruling classes having a lark