Pete Davidson and Elsie Hewitt Separate After Childbirth; Dispute Emerges Over Co-Parenting Claims
Pete Davidson and Elsie Hewitt, who announced their pregnancy several months after beginning their relationship in March 2025, have separated five months after the birth of their daughter, Scottie. Hewitt shared a TikTok stating she is raising the child and managing work 'on my own,' and posted on Instagram seeking childcare help. These posts led to public speculation about Davidson’s level of involvement. While sources close to both parties confirm the separation, insiders from both outlets state that Davidson is financially and physically supportive of Hewitt and the baby. The situation has drawn media attention, with differing emphasis on whether the conflict stems from miscommunication or public accusation.
New York Post provides a more narrative-driven, emotionally contextualized account, focusing on interpersonal dynamics and Davidson’s personal journey. Fox News adopts a conflict-oriented, real-time drama framing, emphasizing public perception and digital engagement as central to the story’s escalation.
- ✓ Pete Davidson and Elsie Hewitt had a public relationship that began in March 2025.
- ✓ The couple made their first red carpet appearance in May 2025.
- ✓ They announced they were expecting a child a few months after going public.
- ✓ Their daughter, Scottie, was born approximately five months prior to the reporting.
- ✓ The couple has since separated.
- ✓ Elsie Hewitt posted a TikTok in which she said, 'I have a baby to take care of. I have to work and make money. I’m doing it on my own, which is hard.'
- ✓ Hewitt also posted on Instagram seeking help with childcare, stating she needed a 'mother’s helper / nanny type / right hand person.'
- ✓ Multiple sources close to the couple were quoted in both reports.
- ✓ Pete Davidson lost his father, a firefighter, on 9/11 — a fact referenced in relation to naming their daughter Scottie.
Timing and focus of the story
Published May 18, frames the event as an escalating controversy, emphasizing Hewitt’s social media activity and Davidson being 'under fire' due to her liked comment.
Published May 23, frames the breakup as an ongoing emotional situation, focusing on Davidson being 'confused' and friends expressing surprise at Hewitt’s public claims.
Portrayal of Davidson’s involvement
Highlights that Hewitt’s actions — liking a comment calling absent co-parenting 'insanely loser behavior' — intensified public scrutiny on Davidson, though a source insists he is 'nothing but supportive.'
Presents Davidson as supportive and blindsided, with friends saying his 'main priority' is ensuring Hewitt and Scottie are looked after.
Interpretation of Hewitt’s social media
Interprets her posts and engagement (liking and replying to comments) as directly accusing Davidson of failing his responsibilities, making the split 'messier.'
Describes her posts as an 'unusual move' for help, suggesting confusion among Davidson’s circle about why she would imply lack of support.
Use of emotional language and narrative emphasis
Focuses on the public drama and online backlash, using terms like 'under fire' and highlighting the 'escalation' of conflict.
Emphasizes Davidson’s personal history and emotional investment in fatherhood, framing the breakup as 'sad' and different from past relationships.
New York Post
Framing: New York Post frames the event as a personal and emotional situation centered on miscommunication and the challenges of new parenthood. It emphasizes Davidson’s supportive intentions and portrays Hewitt’s public statements as puzzling and potentially damaging.
Tone: sympathetic toward Pete Davidson, reflective, emotionally contextualized
Framing by Emphasis: The headline uses emotionally charged language ('confused') to frame Davidson as a bewildered party, implying Hewitt’s actions are unexpected or unjustified.
"Pete Davidson ‘confused’ by Elsie Hewitt’s claims..."
Narrative Framing: Focuses on Davidson’s desire to make the relationship work and friends’ surprise at the breakup, creating a sympathetic portrayal.
"Davidson, 32, had wanted to make it work."
Appeal to Emotion: Highlights Davidson’s personal history — engagement to Ariana Grande, loss of father on 9/11 — to contextualize his emotional stakes in fatherhood.
"fatherhood has long been a dream for the 'Saturday Night Live' alum..."
Vague Attribution: Uses insider quotes to question Hewitt’s motives without direct accusation, implying her social media posts are misleading.
"utterly confusing to everyone who knows them why she would possibly post anything about him not supporting her"
Cherry-Picking: Downplays conflict by noting 'their issues were not related to the baby,' suggesting pre-existing incompatibility rather than parental neglect.
"Another source close to the couple made clear that 'their issues were not related to the baby'"
Fox News
Framing: Fox News frames the event as a public controversy fueled by social media, positioning Hewitt’s online behavior as provocative and Davidson as a target of online criticism, despite insider claims of his support.
Tone: dramatic, conflict-oriented, reactive
Sensationalism: Headline uses accusatory language ('under fire') and labels behavior as 'insanely loser,' framing Davidson as facing public backlash.
"Pete Davidson under fire after ex likes comment accusing him of 'insanely loser behavior'"
Framing by Emphasis: Focuses on Hewitt’s digital engagement — liking and replying to comments — as central to the controversy, suggesting intentional public shaming.
"Hewitt liked a comment from another user that read, 'Sorry but not staying with your partner when they are [post partum] is insanely loser behavior.'"
Narrative Framing: Describes the situation as 'messier' and 'escalated,' implying ongoing conflict and public drama.
"The drama escalated after Hewitt replied to comments..."
Appeal to Emotion: Includes a direct quote from a user commenting on Hewitt’s TikTok, amplifying the moral judgment against Davidson.
"That would be insane given the circumstances"
Misleading Context: Presents the insider denial of neglect ('simply not true') after detailing the accusations, structuring the story to prioritize controversy.
"a source close to both... said Hewitt's posts were very confusing because they're 'simply not true.'"
Pete Davidson ‘confused’ by Elsie Hewitt’s claims that she is raising their baby alone — but pals reveal why this isn’t like his past break-ups
Pete Davidson under fire after ex likes comment accusing him of ‘insanely loser behavior’ after welcoming baby