It Shouldn’t Be This Easy to Get High
The New York Times
Overall Assessment
The article advocates for increasing the cost of substances through taxation and non-incarcerative penalties as a solution to rising addiction rates. It uses economic data and policy examples to support its argument while framing widespread drug availability as a societal problem. The stance is policy-oriented but rooted in a moral concern about intoxication’s societal impact.
"It’s a less safe society, too, as intoxication and illegal drug markets so often fester into crime. And it’s a less rational one; most people don’t make their best decisions when stoned or drunk."
Moral Framing
Headline & Lead 35/100
The headline and opening frame the issue through a moral and alarmist lens, using emotionally charged language and broad claims without immediate qualification or neutral framing.
✕ Loaded Labels: The headline uses a subjective, judgment-laden phrase ('It Shouldn’t Be This Easy to Get High') that frames the topic morally rather than neutrally, suggesting a normative stance before the reader engages with the content.
"It Shouldn’t Be This Easy to Get High"
✕ Sensationalism: The lead asserts a broad societal condition ('It has never been easier to be intoxicated all day, every day') without qualification or sourcing, presenting a sweeping generalization as fact.
"It has never been easier to be intoxicated all day, every day in the United States."
Language & Tone 45/100
The tone is persuasive and morally charged, using emotive language and personal appeals typical of opinion journalism rather than dispassionate reporting.
✕ Loaded Language: The article uses emotionally charged descriptors like 'awash with cheap drugs' and 'hijack our minds,' which dramatize the issue and appeal to fear.
"No one wants to be a buzzkill, but a nation awash with cheap drugs is a nation with more drug problems."
✕ Loaded Language: Phrases like 'get high,' 'buzzkill,' and 'prison' of addiction use informal, value-laden language that undermines neutral tone.
"Addicts often describe dependence on a drug as its own kind of prison."
✕ Editorializing: The use of 'we' and 'our' personalizes the argument and aligns reader with author’s perspective, a rhetorical move common in opinion writing but at odds with neutral reporting.
"As much of the country dials back policies... we should look for other ways to attach friction to substances that in abundance can hijack our minds and lead us to overuse, addiction or worse."
Balance 65/100
The article cites credible research and acknowledges counterarguments but relies primarily on the author’s voice and institutional reports, lacking diverse expert or affected-community perspectives.
✓ Proper Attribution: The article attributes claims to specific studies and institutions (e.g., Australian Institute of Criminology), enhancing credibility for key assertions.
"A 10 percent increase in the price of illegal drugs leads to a 9 percent decrease in demand, a review from the Australian Institute of Criminology found."
✓ Viewpoint Diversity: It acknowledges industry opposition ('often made by the alcohol industry') and addresses the regressive tax argument, showing engagement with counterpoints.
"One argument, often made by the alcohol industry, is that such taxes are regressive, and it’s true that higher prices hit the poor harder."
✕ Single-Source Reporting: The sole named individual is the author, who is also the opinion writer, indicating no independent expert voices are quoted beyond institutional citations.
Story Angle 40/100
The story is framed as a moral and economic intervention, emphasizing individual choice shaped by price rather than systemic inequities or public health models of addiction.
✕ Narrative Framing: The article frames substance use primarily as a behavioral response to price and cost, downplaying structural, psychological, or social determinants of addiction.
"The key point is that imposing at least some cost can help lead people away from using drugs."
✕ Moral Framing: It presents a moral framing of intoxication as undermining societal health, safety, rationality, and freedom, positioning sobriety as a civic good.
"It’s a less safe society, too, as intoxication and illegal drug markets so often fester into crime. And it’s a less rational one; most people don’t make their best decisions when stoned or drunk."
Completeness 60/100
The article offers useful historical and policy context on drug pricing and regulation but omits deeper systemic factors contributing to substance use, narrowing the explanatory frame.
✓ Contextualisation: The article provides historical price trends for alcohol, marijuana, and synthetic drugs, offering useful economic context for affordability changes over time.
"In 1950, the typical American would have had to spend 75 percent of his or her daily pay (after taxes) to buy a bottle of vodka. Today, that number is less than 5 percent."
✓ Contextualisation: It references specific policy examples (Alabama, Maryland, Utah) and international models (Portugal) to ground recommendations in real-world cases.
"Alabama, Maryland and Utah have enacted such measures in recent years, showing it’s politically possible."
✕ Omission: The article omits discussion of structural drivers of addiction such as trauma, poverty, mental health access, or pharmaceutical industry influence, focusing narrowly on price and policy.
Taxation is framed as an effective tool to reduce substance use
[proper_attribution] and [narrative_framing]: The article cites studies showing price increases reduce consumption, positioning taxation as a proven and rational policy lever.
"Raising the price of alcohol by 10 percent would reduce drinking by 5 percent and the death rate from alcohol-caused diseases by 9 to 25 percent, studies have found."
Drug use is portrayed as endangering individuals and society
[loaded_language] and [moral_framing]: The article uses emotionally charged language to depict drug use as a widespread threat to public safety, health, and rationality.
"It’s a less safe society, too, as intoxication and illegal drug markets so often fester into crime. And it’s a less rational one; most people don’t make their best decisions when stoned or drunk."
Lenient drug enforcement is framed as adversarial to public health
[sensationalism] and [narrative_framing]: The article criticizes reduced legal consequences for public drug use, framing decriminalization efforts as enabling harm rather than supporting public health.
"In some progressive cities, people often use drugs in public and face zero legal consequences."
People with addiction are framed as socially excluded and trapped
[loaded_language] and [moral_framing]: Addiction is described metaphorically as a prison, emphasizing loss of freedom and agency, which frames users as victims of their condition but also implicitly marginalizes them.
"Addicts often describe dependence on a drug as its own kind of prison."
Government policy is implied to be failing in managing substance affordability
[contextualisation] and [editorializing]: While not directly attacking institutions, the article implies governmental inaction on taxation and regulation has allowed a crisis to grow, suggesting policy failure.
"Lawmakers can simply raise prices by increasing taxes. Alabama, Maryland and Utah have enacted such measures in recent years, showing it’s politically possible."
The article advocates for increasing the cost of substances through taxation and non-incarcerative penalties as a solution to rising addiction rates. It uses economic data and policy examples to support its argument while framing widespread drug availability as a societal problem. The stance is policy-oriented but rooted in a moral concern about intoxication’s societal impact.
The cost of legal and illegal substances in the United States has declined significantly over recent decades due to tax policy, legalization, and market shifts. Research suggests higher prices can reduce consumption and related harms, leading some policymakers to consider tax increases or alternative penalties. Access to affordable addiction treatment remains a key factor in addressing substance use.
The New York Times — Lifestyle - Health
Based on the last 60 days of articles
The New York Times
No related content