Department ‘didn’t have clue’ if culvert where Noah Donohoe died was locked, inquest told
Irish Times
Overall Assessment
The article reports on a contested claim during an inquest with strong attribution and balanced sourcing. It avoids sensationalism and maintains a neutral tone while presenting conflicting viewpoints. Some contextual omissions and a truncated quote slightly weaken completeness.
"He said a lot of attention in the inquest had been on whether there should have been a security, rather than a "
Cherry Picking
Headline & Lead 85/100
The headline effectively frames a key dispute in the inquest — the department's knowledge of the hatch’s status — while attributing the strong language appropriately, avoiding sensationalism by presenting it as a claim under scrutiny.
✓ Balanced Reporting: The headline accurately reflects the central issue in the article — whether the Department knew if the culvert was locked — and presents it as a contested claim rather than a fact, inviting readers to consider both sides.
"Department ‘didn’t have clue’ if culvert where Noah Donohoe died was locked, inquest told"
✓ Proper Attribution: The headline uses quotation marks around the phrase ‘didn’t have clue’, clearly attributing it to a party in the inquest (counsel for the family), which prevents misrepresentation.
"‘didn’t have clue’"
Language & Tone 90/100
The article maintains a neutral tone by relying on direct quotes from both sides of the dispute, avoiding emotional language or judgmental phrasing.
✓ Balanced Reporting: The article presents both the department’s position and the legal challenge to it without taking sides, allowing the tension between the two to unfold through direct quotes.
"McKee said: ‘The assertion that the department didn’t have a clue is wrong.’"
✓ Balanced Reporting: It includes the counsel’s counter-assertion with equal prominence, maintaining neutrality in tone while highlighting the conflict.
"Campbell said the assertion was ‘entirely right’ because the department still did not know for sure."
✕ Editorializing: Minimal; the phrase ‘great shock’ is quoted from McKee, not editorialized by the reporter, preserving objectivity.
"It was an absolute shock to us that Noah had lost his life in a culvert the department maintains."
Balance 95/100
The sourcing is robust, with clear attribution and representation of both official and family perspectives, meeting high standards of credibility.
✓ Proper Attribution: All key claims are clearly attributed to named individuals — McKee and Campbell — enhancing transparency and accountability.
"McKee told the jury that the department had taken the opportunity to “modernise the screen”"
✓ Comprehensive Sourcing: The article includes perspectives from both the state department and the bereaved family’s legal representative, ensuring balanced representation.
"Campbell told the witness that a photograph from May 2017 showed a padlock on the old grille but no padlock on the new grille."
Completeness 80/100
The article provides substantial context but omits some relevant background on child proximity and cuts off a key quote, slightly reducing completeness.
✕ Omission: The article omits explicit mention of the fact that the department did not track how many children lived near the culvert — a known fact from other coverage — which is relevant to the risk assessment discussion.
✓ Comprehensive Sourcing: It provides key context: the 2017 refurbishment, the replacement of the grille, and the timeline of Noah’s disappearance and discovery.
"The steps at the culvert had been refurbished in 2017 and the debris grille covering the culvert had been replaced."
✕ Cherry Picking: The article cuts off McKee’s quote mid-sentence about security versus functionality, potentially truncating important nuance in risk management philosophy.
"He said a lot of attention in the inquest had been on whether there should have been a security, rather than a "
Culvert infrastructure portrayed as posing unmanaged danger to children
[omission] (severity 7/10): The article omits explicit mention of the fact that the department did not track how many children lived near the culvert — a known fact from other coverage — which, when combined with visual evidence of unlocked access, frames the site as threateningly exposed.
"She then asked him if the department knew how many children lived in nearby houses through which there was access to the area. He said the department would not have needed to know that information."
Culvert maintenance and risk management framed as inadequate despite upgrades
[balanced_reporting] (severity 9/10): While the department claims the screen was 'performing as it should', the juxtaposition with unlocked access and tragic outcome frames the infrastructure as failing in its broader safety function.
"The screen was still performing as it should, it was doing its job as it should, it was keeping significant debris out of the pipe."
Inquest process highlights systemic failures and prolonged scrutiny
[cherry_picking] (severity 6/10): The article cuts off McKee’s quote mid-sentence about security versus functionality, potentially truncating important nuance in risk management philosophy, which amplifies the sense of unresolved tension and institutional scrutiny.
"He said a lot of attention in the inquest had been on whether there should have been a security, rather than a "
Children’s safety framed as overlooked in infrastructure planning
[omission] (severity 7/10): The department’s admission that it did not consider or track child proximity to a dangerous site implies exclusion of children’s welfare from risk assessment priorities.
"She then asked him if the department knew how many children lived in nearby houses through which there was access to the area. He said the department would not have needed to know that information."
Department's credibility questioned over knowledge gaps about basic safety measures
[balanced_reporting] (severity 9/10): The article presents both sides of a dispute over whether the department 'had a clue' about the lock status, but the framing of uncertainty — especially amid photographic evidence — leans toward portraying institutional untrustworthiness.
"Campbell said the witness that a photograph from May 2017 showed a padlock on the old grille but no padlock on the new grille."
The article reports on a contested claim during an inquest with strong attribution and balanced sourcing. It avoids sensationalism and maintains a neutral tone while presenting conflicting viewpoints. Some contextual omissions and a truncated quote slightly weaken completeness.
A senior official from the Department for Infrastructure stated the hatch on a culvert where Noah Donohoe died was likely not locked between 2017 and 2020, contradicting claims the department lacked knowledge. The family’s counsel challenged this, citing photographic evidence showing a padlock on the old grille but not the new. The department maintains it acted transparently and prioritized risk reduction.
Irish Times — Other - Crime
Based on the last 60 days of articles
Irish Times
