Consumers
Date Range
Score Range
Portrays consumers as passive victims of uncontrollable global forces
The framing emphasizes that 'consumers are already feeling the pinch' without contextualizing their exposure as a result of policy choices, fostering a narrative of inevitability rather than political responsibility.
“Consumers are already feeling the pinch from higher cost of gas: In May, elevated prices at the pump helped push overall inflation to a three-year high of 4.2%”
Framed as excluded and exploited by FIFA's practices
Language positions fans as victims of manipulation and unfair access, emphasizing their marginalization in the ticketing process.
“No one should be manipulated into paying sky-high prices for seats, and fans should be able to trust that the tickets they purchase will be the ones they receive.”
Framed as being protected and included through government action
Story angle emphasizes government scrutiny in response to public concern, positioning fans as deserving of fair access and protection from exploitation.
“"New Yorkers have been waiting years for the World Cup to come to their backyard, and they deserve a fair shot at affordable tickets," James said in a release.”
Framed as betrayed and emotionally abandoned by a trusted brand
Emotional language and personal anecdotes depict loyal customers as personally wounded, suggesting they are being excluded from the brand’s new identity.
““How did they swing the pendulum so far that they’re able to sell to the radical opposite of what they stood for?””
Domestic consumers portrayed as rightful beneficiaries of transparent labelling and regulatory protection
[comprehensive_sourcing]: Article opens with reference to 'Buy Canadian' movement and quotes CFIA stating 'Canadians have been clear that they want to support Canadian businesses.' Positions consumers as collectively demanding honesty and national loyalty in sourcing.
““Canadians have been clear that they want to support Canadian businesses and buy Canadian products,” said the agency in an email.”
Consumers are framed as deserving better information and protection in their sustainability choices
[comprehensive_sourcing]: Experts stress that shoppers are trying to make informed choices but are being misled, warranting systemic support.
“Shoppers trying to reduce their environmental footprint deserve better than that.”
Framing consumers as vulnerable and in need of protection
[balanced_reporting] and [proper_attribution]: The article repeatedly highlights consumers being misled, signed up without permission, or charged unfairly, framing them as victims in need of institutional protection, thus positioning them as a group requiring inclusion and safeguarding.
“Some consumers are also being signed up without their permission or by multiple companies, the FCA said, which could delay compensation they are owed”
Ordinary readers are framed as excluded by elitist publishing practices
The author positions himself as a typical reader constrained by time and money, suggesting that hardbacks exclude the average person, thus framing consumers as marginalized by industry norms.
“I’m a fairly typical reader and get through a decent number of books every year. I mainly read fiction and try to keep up with what’s going on in contemporary literature. But time and money aren’t plentiful; I’m a slow reader and a freelance journalist.”
Consumers' economic burden excluded from meaningful discussion
Selective coverage focuses on corporate earnings and analyst forecasts while omitting impacts of high gas prices on household budgets, inequality, or民生 stress, marginalizing public cost.
“The current average US gas price stood Friday at $4.39”
framed as morally compromised and complicit through consumption
[appeal_to_emotion] and [editorializing]: uses rhetorical questions to induce guilt and position consumers as ethically responsible
“Is it OK to continue to buy cheap stuff online and in the stores and from our favourite vendors, once we know that slavery was involved in its creation?”