US Military
Date Range
Score Range
US military portrayed as highly competent and trustworthy
The Pentagon spokesperson's quote uses hyperbolic, uncritical praise—'greatest fighting force in human history'—presented without challenge or irony, reinforcing a narrative of exceptionalism and moral authority.
“The Department of War is proud of our incredible troops. Their courage, readiness, grit, and unmatched professionalism are why they are the greatest fighting force in human history”
US military leadership portrayed as engaging in or covering up unlawful conduct
[passive_voice_agency_obfuscation] and [viewpoint_diversity]: Official statements denying wrongdoing contrasted with expert condemnation and internal dissent, creating a framing of institutional unaccountability
“All operations are conducted deliberately and lawfully, in full compliance with U.S. and international law, including the law of armed conflict.”
US troops portrayed as vulnerable and under persistent threat
Framing emphasizes attacks on US bases and casualties, while passive voice initially obscures agency, heightening sense of danger.
“13 US service members were killed in Operation Epic Fury”
US military actions portrayed as consistently effective and decisive
Reporting emphasizes successful kills and unharmed US forces without scrutiny, framing operations as cleanly executed and effective.
“Three male narco-terrorists were killed during this action. No U.S. military forces were harmed”
US military bases portrayed as vulnerable and under sustained threat
The article emphasizes satellite evidence of damage to 20 US military sites and quotes experts suggesting US complacency, framing American forces as exposed and at risk despite technological superiority.
“The extent of damage caused to US facilities is difficult to quantify, but a May estimate by the Pentagon put the total cost of Operation Epic Fury at $29b”
Implying untrustworthiness through lack of transparency and evidence
[official_source_bias], [omission]: Reliance on unverified military claims and absence of independent verification or survivor testimony frames the military as opaque and potentially unaccountable.
“The US military provided no evidence to support the claim the people were trafficking drugs”
Framed as excluding service members based on body size
[loaded_labels], [framing_by_emphasis] — The repeated use of stigmatizing quotes like 'no fat troops' and 'no fattys' without critical distancing frames larger service members as excluded and devalued within the military community.
“There will be no "fat troops" or "fat generals and admirals in the halls of the Pentagon," Hegseth said in the October during a speech at Marine Base Quantico, Virginia.”
U.S. military and allies portrayed as under imminent threat from Iranian actions
Use of 'defensive efforts' to describe U.S. strikes frames American forces as reactive and endangered, reinforcing the perception of Iran as a persistent threat. The description emphasizes protection of troops without questioning the proportionality or legality of the response.
“to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces”
US Military members portrayed as disrespected and endangered by political figures
[loaded_verbs] and [moral_framing] — The repeated use of 'mock' and the inclusion of the quote calling a wounded soldier 'dumb' and saying he 'didn't deserve to live' frames military service members as under verbal attack from a political candidate, implying a lack of safety from public disrespect.
“Dumb motherf****** didn't deserve to live. At least his stupidity and fat ass wheezing are available for all future infantrymen to witness and hold in contempt.”
US military leadership framed as untrustworthy due to dismissal of credible evidence
[loaded_language] and [framing_by_emphasis]: Use of 'ridiculous' to describe US claims, combined with emphasis on contradiction between testimony and verified data, undermines trust in official narratives.
“Senators greeted Cooper’s claims with deep scepticism, and a human rights group that investigates civilian casualties in war called it “ridiculous”.”