Agenda Signals / Search

Search Agenda Signals

Search for subjects across all topics.

Portrays Ukraine as conducting aggressive cross-border attacks

0 +
-4

Portrays Ukraine as effectively striking back and turning the tide of war

0 +
+7

Frames infrastructure quality as damaging to Canada’s image abroad

0 +
-7

Portrays Ukraine as strategically proactive and justified in seeking urgent military support

0 +
+6

Positions Ukraine as a morally justified recipient of unwavering Western support against Russian aggression.

0 +
+8

Portrays Ukraine's EU integration as a justified and courageous step forward, emphasizing resilience and reform under duress.

0 +
+8

Portrays Ukraine as strategically proactive and justified in seeking military aid

0 +
+6

Portrays Ukraine's EU accession as a justified and commendable path toward stability and reform

0 +
+8

Portrays Ukraine as resilient and historically significant in enduring a prolonged, brutal war

0 +
+7

Portrays Ukraine as resilient and strategically adaptive in a historically significant conflict

0 +
+6

Portrays Ukraine's military actions as effective and strategically justified

0 +
+7

Frames Ukraine as resilient and strategically adaptive in a historic conflict

0 +
+5

Presents Ukraine’s position as legally justified and diplomatically successful

0 +
+4

Frames Ukraine as resilient, technologically advanced, and culturally unified in resistance

0 +
+9

Portrays Ukraine as an innovative, tech-savvy military actor adapting creatively to war, countering narratives of victimhood or backwardness.

0 +
+7

Portrays Ukraine as strategically effective and resilient in its campaign against Russian occupation

0 +
+7

Portrays Ukraine as strategically effective and resilient in countering Russian occupation

0 +
+8

Suggests a borderless, pervasive threat from foreign criminals infiltrating Ireland

0 +
-7

Portrays Ukraine as strategically capable and resilient in conducting symbolic long-range strikes against Russia

0 +
+6

Portrays Ukraine as resilient and strategically adaptive in a historic, high-stakes conflict

0 +
+5

Portrays Ukraine as trapped in a futile, grinding war with no resolution

0 +
-6

Portrays Ukraine as capable and strategically effective in striking deep into Russian territory

0 +
+7

Positively frames Ukraine as a legitimate recipient of military support through industrial partnership

0 +
+5

Portrays Ukraine as a justified victim of aggression and recipient of legitimate international support

0 +
+8

Implies the IOC applies rules on political symbolism insensitively, particularly toward historically marginalized nations

0 +
-4

Suggests a pattern of international sports organizations policing Haitian national symbolism

0 +
-5

Frames Ukraine as a legitimate recipient of military support under external aggression

0 +
+6

Frames Ukraine's EU membership bid as legitimate, urgent, and morally justified due to Russian invasion

0 +
+7

Portrays Ukraine as effectively retaliating and strategically assertive

0 +
+7

Portrays Ukraine as strategically effective in intelligence operations

0 +
+4

Portrays Ukraine as a capable and justified actor conducting strategic military operations against Russian war infrastructure.

0 +
+7

Portrays Ukraine as technologically advanced and strategically proactive in striking deep into Russian territory

0 +
+7

Portrays Ukraine as strategically innovative and effective in its military campaign

0 +
+7

Positively frames Ukraine as a legitimate partner in defense technology development

0 +
+3

Suggests Ukraine is diplomatically insensitive and potentially ungrateful toward a key ally

0 +
-4

Portrays the ICC as institutionally corrupt and illegitimate, particularly due to its actions against Israel

0 +
-9