Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results)
U.S. military action in Iran is framed as lacking proper authorization and thus illegitimate
suggests escalating tension in cross-strait relations
Military situation framed as escalating crisis
Military engagement framed as escalating and out of control
Military engagement framed as endangering regional stability
Military engagement framed as ongoing crisis requiring urgent congressional intervention
U.S. military action implicitly framed as illegitimate due to omission of recent escalations and ceasefire context
Military action framed as hostile and confrontational
framed as increasing threat to regional sovereignty and democratic autonomy
The war is framed as entering a new, urgent phase of escalation and crisis
Five Eyes personnel and institutions portrayed as under active threat
Russian military action framed as reactive and aggressive
Framed as an ongoing, unstable crisis with repeated ceasefire violations
Survivors of initial strike portrayed as vulnerable and endangered by follow-up attack
U.S. strikes framed as legally questionable and potentially unlawful
U.S. military action framed as hostile and aggressive toward alleged traffickers
US military involvement is framed as lacking proper authorization and legitimacy
Framed as honest and accountable
Framed as legally justified and authoritative
Framed as hostile and threatening
U.S. military action framed as hostile and antagonistic
Military action framed as hostile and adversarial toward Iran
US military action in Iran framed as lacking legitimacy
Military action framed as illegitimate without congressional approval
framed as failing to deter Iranian influence
Military campaign against drug boats framed as ineffective given trafficking realities
Military strikes framed as legally questionable and potentially unlawful
U.S. military involvement framed as hostile and unilateral
framed as an ongoing, unstable crisis despite official claims of victory
Joint military operations portrayed as ineffective at protecting civilians despite long-standing campaigns
Taiwan-related diplomatic tensions framed as escalating into a crisis due to new punitive measures
framed as ineffective in addressing root causes of drug trafficking
framed as legally questionable and potentially unlawful
Military personnel portrayed as vulnerable targets of foreign espionage
framed as an ongoing crisis requiring urgent ceasefire
Ongoing hostilities framed as a continuing crisis despite ceasefire agreement
framed as posing ongoing danger to civilians and medical infrastructure
Chinese military intervention in 1989 framed as illegitimate and violent suppression
National security portrayed as potentially endangered by insider risk
UK military and government personnel portrayed as vulnerable to external threats
UK military and government personnel portrayed as vulnerable to infiltration
Five Eyes military and government personnel framed as vulnerable and under threat
Framed as legally questionable and potentially unlawful
local governance portrayed as destabilized by provincial intervention
Implies security spending is being misused for political or personal projects
U.S. military action in Iran framed as unilateral and adversarial, lacking broad support
Missing US scientist’s body found ‘skeletonised’ with gunshot wound as grisly details emerge: report
US defence and nuclear programs are framed as dangerous environments where personnel are at risk
Military situation framed as ongoing crisis with escalation
Military action in Iran framed as harmful and misguided
Military conflict framed as intensifying and entering a new phase of long-range drone warfare
Frames national security as threatened by insider appointments
pipeline planning process portrayed as destabilizing and crisis-prone due to lack of consultation
framed as part of an escalating and urgent nuclear crisis
Military escalation framed as necessary and beneficial to prevent greater catastrophe
framed as being in urgent jeopardy due to political appointment
Intelligence community effectiveness is portrayed as compromised by political loyalty over expertise
Drone warfare framed as escalating and destabilizing
Ukrainian military action portrayed as effective and morally justified retaliation
UK national security portrayed as under active threat
National security portrayed as endangered by unqualified leadership
Dubai's legal system implicitly framed as arbitrary or illegitimate due to lack of context
British military personnel are portrayed as vulnerable and under active threat from foreign espionage
Armed militant groups are framed as hostile actors obstructing health efforts
Military service in Russia's war effort portrayed as extremely dangerous and life-threatening
Emphasises the ongoing war as a high-stakes, urgent crisis with regional escalation
Military action in Lebanon framed as dangerously out of control and escalating
The Taiwan Strait is framed as requiring active preservation of peace, implying underlying instability
The South China Sea is framed as a zone of escalating unilateral actions and deteriorating diplomatic efforts, moving away from stability toward a fragmented, crisis-driven reality.
Intelligence apparatus portrayed as undermined by unqualified leadership
National security is framed as endangered by unqualified leadership
Frames the appointment of the acting Director of National Intelligence as unqualified and based on loyalty over competence
National security portrayed as endangered by unqualified leadership
Russia's military action in Ukraine framed as self-destructive and economically damaging to Russia
Framing militarized infrastructure (Drone Port) as a defensive necessity
Situation framed as escalating crisis requiring immediate military response
Undermines legitimacy of state-led infrastructure projects by highlighting use of national security exemptions to override legal challenges
Conflict escalation framed as inevitable and urgent, downplaying diplomacy
framed as occurring in a context of escalating global military tensions and arms race fears
Framed as highly effective in degrading Iran's nuclear and military capabilities
Suggesting potential erosion in NATO's collective military effectiveness due to U.S. drawdown
Military readiness is framed as entering a crisis state due to U.S. drawdown and capability gaps
framed as escalating into symbolic warfare and crisis
framed as a point of economic cooperation rather than conflict
Military service and discipline portrayed as compromised by individual misconduct
Framed as operating in a context of strategic urgency due to external threats
Global security portrayed as under threat due to institutional failure
US military action against Iran framed as justified and successful
Situation framed as urgent breakdown of ceasefire
Military escalation framed as chaotic and driven by personal impulses rather than strategic calculation
Defence Forces' internal systems portrayed as fundamentally failing
U.S.-aligned anti-narcotics military strategy portrayed as beneficial
Regional political tensions framed as escalating toward crisis
Framing of national security threat requiring urgent, militarized response
Situation framed as urgent and escalating
Israel’s interception of the flotilla is framed as illegitimate, lacking justification or legal context
UK national security framed as currently unsafe due to military capability gaps
framing the situation as an ongoing crisis requiring military response
Framed as an ongoing crisis-level conflict
Conflict framed as escalating crisis rather than stabilized warfare
framed as an escalating crisis