Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results)
framed as being violated by Israel’s actions
portrayed as economically beneficial and vital to national prosperity
Existing legal frameworks for Treaty settlements are portrayed as failing under new reforms
Framed as being bypassed or undermined by unilateral U.S. trade actions
International law is implicitly delegitimized by omission and framing
International legal norms framed as bypassed and disregarded
Cuban sovereignty is undermined by framing US intervention as normal or justified
Questioning the legitimacy of Cuba's past actions under international law
The war is framed as a clear violation of international legal norms
Treaty obligations framed as being illegitimately undermined
U.S. actions framed as violating international law
US sanctions framed as violating international legal norms
International legal norms implicitly undermined by omission of context
Voting rights protections framed as weakened following Supreme Court ruling
U.S. sanctions and military actions framed as potentially illegitimate by Cuban officials
International order framed as in crisis and irreparably damaged
International human rights law is being framed as illegitimate or subject to political override
National hero portrayed as turning against his roots and people
US aid offer framed as politically illegitimate
International law framed as disregarded and unenforced
international law framed as failing to constrain powerful states
Framing Filipinos as victims of foreign legal overreach
Undermining legitimacy of international legal action
Framing international law as ineffective amid conflict
Israel's military actions are framed as violating international legal norms
International law portrayed as disregarded by Iran while US actions are normalized
Private corporate action on geoengineering is framed as lacking legal legitimacy and oversight
U.S. sanctions framed as illegitimate by omission of UN ruling
Framed as being undermined by government-sanctioned religious nationalism
Israel's actions framed as violating international legal norms
framed as being in a state of crisis due to uncertainty around a key athlete's availability
International legal order portrayed as undermined, but asymmetrically
The US-Israeli military action is framed as legitimate despite clear violations of international law
Treaty law portrayed as effectively constraining unilateral secession efforts
International law undermined by omission of US-Israeli violations
US military action framed as violating international legal norms
International agreements framed as informal and unverified
International law concerns dismissed through omission, framing U.S./Israeli actions as above legal scrutiny
Naval blockade enforcement framed as legally questionable and escalating
International law is framed as being disregarded by powerful states with impunity
State bar disciplinary processes are subtly framed as potentially politically motivated
Iran’s military actions portrayed as illegitimate
The US-Israeli military action is framed as a violation of international legal norms
International Law is portrayed as valid and authoritative in condemning settlements
International law portrayed as being undermined and selectively enforced, with Western powers depicted as enabling violations
International law is implicitly delegitimized by omitting widespread expert condemnation of the U.S.-Israeli war as illegal under the UN Charter.
Norway's unilateral action framed as undermining legal contract norms
Framed as valid and authoritative, in contrast to state actions
Questioning legitimacy of China's legal claims via UN Resolution 2758 interpretation
International legal processes are portrayed as credible and essential to addressing climate change
Legal process in Dubai framed as opaque and punitive
ICC and international legal process framed as overreach and threat to sovereignty
Use of force by US/Israel framed as controversial and legally questionable
Filipino sovereignty framed as under foreign attack
Frames international legal action as illegitimate and politically motivated
National Party framed as the principled adversary holding Labour accountable
Implies US military actions lack legal legitimacy by omitting context of unlawful strikes and assassinations
Israeli actions portrayed as violating international norms and due process
Legal critiques of war initiation excluded from narrative
National Party framed as underperforming
ICC and international legal process framed as legitimate authority pursuing accountability
International legal institutions framed as hostile foreign actors
Framed as valid and authoritative, with no challenge to its jurisdiction or motives
Implication that military actions may lack legal justification
Canada’s climate commitments framed as incoherent and losing legitimacy
International law concerns excluded from narrative
International legal mechanisms are portrayed as valid and necessary checks on state power
Framed as foreign competitors undermining American ownership of the NBA
Framing ICC intervention as legitimate and urgent
International law and legal concerns omitted, undermining legitimacy of legal constraints
Framed as being violated by cross-border drone strikes
Venezuela's sovereignty framed as under illegitimate threat
International law is undermined by omission in context of ongoing violations
International law violations by US-Israel downplayed or erased
International legal norms dismissed as irrelevant to US actions
Israeli military actions framed as operating outside legitimate legal bounds
Israeli military actions are framed as lacking legal legitimacy
ICC and international law framed as illegitimate foreign interference
ICC authority framed as illegitimate foreign interference
Suggestion that institutions upholding Israel's participation are complicit or untrustworthy
Implication that Israel's participation lacks legitimacy despite adherence to formal rules
Framed as illegitimate foreign interference
Ireland’s legal system framed as illegitimate relative to international norms
Framed as violating international legal norms
International law framed as irrelevant or obstructive
International legal action portrayed as harmful to domestic order
framed as being violated by continued military actions despite ceasefire
framed as being violated by Israeli actions
Undermines legitimacy of international legal constraints on war
RN framed as a divisive political adversary
Legal ban on conversion therapy framed as a legitimate and necessary human rights measure
Russia's maritime activities framed as potentially violating norms around transport of sensitive nuclear materials
Domestic erosion of voting rights framed as undermining legal legitimacy
British ownership framed as under threat, national belonging diminished
AI industry self-regulation framed as insufficient, implying need for external legal legitimacy
International law and legal constraints framed as irrelevant or obstructive
Allegations of Israeli abuse framed as legally dubious and part of an anti-Israel campaign
Undermining legitimacy of ongoing military actions by highlighting collateral environmental damage
International humanitarian law is portrayed as essential and non-negotiable
National Party framed as transparent on future policy intentions