Agenda Signals / Search

Search Agenda Signals

Search for subjects across all topics.

Implies social media was used to harass and silence victims who spoke out

0 +
-4

Frames social media use as inherently exploitative when done by public figures, emphasizing contradiction over nuance

0 +
-6

Portrays social media as inherently harmful to children due to addictive design and exposure to dangerous content

0 +
-7

Suggests social media platforms amplify division and incite violence under Musk’s ownership

0 +
-7

Criticizes social media for amplifying harmful trends and enabling wildlife exploitation

0 +
-6

Portrays social media as an accelerant for racialized violence and disinformation

0 +
-8

Frames social media as a platform for polarized, unreflective reactions that amplify controversy over meaning

0 +
-6

Portrays social media as a harmful influence on youth development

0 +
-8

Portrays social media as a destructive force in politics and personal identity

0 +
-6

Frames social media as a primary driver of racialized violence and disorder

0 +
-9

Portrays social media as an amplifier of outrage and decontextualized moments

0 +
-5

Elevates unverified social media statements to the status of official diplomatic fact

0 +
+7

Suggests livestreaming platforms amplify and exploit real-time violence for attention.

0 +
-5

Frames social media platforms as predatory systems exploiting vulnerable youth

0 +
-8

Frames online platforms as dangerous spaces enabling exploitation of vulnerable individuals

0 +
-6

Portrays social media as a vector for coordinated disinformation and election interference

0 +
-5

Implies social media is used for state propaganda

0 +
-4

Frames social media as a vector for dangerous misinformation and peer-driven risk behavior

0 +
-8

Framing social media as a potential danger to children through association with a viral challenge

0 +
-6

Highlights role of social media in amplifying far-right mobilization and incitement

0 +
-7

Depicts social media as a tool for inciting and spreading anti-immigrant violence

0 +
-7

Portrays social media as a weaponized tool for spreading hate and inciting violence

0 +
-7

Depicts social media as a primary driver of violence and hatred

0 +
-8

Implies online platforms enable and amplify unethical puppy sales

0 +
-6

Portrayed as inherently harmful to youth, requiring state intervention

0 +
-6

Portrays social media as inherently harmful to children and in need of strict regulation

0 +
-7

Portrays social media platforms as harmful and in need of strict regulation to protect youth.

0 +
-8

Associates digital expression with real-world threats

0 +
-6

Demonizes social media as a driver of dangerous mob behavior and misinformation

0 +
-8

Depicts social media as a platform for fan delusion and toxic outrage

0 +
-7

Portrays social media platforms as amplifiers of hate and enablers of real-world violence

0 +
-7

Frames social media as a dangerous amplifier of unrest and source of 'toxicity'

0 +
-7

Implicates social media in amplifying hatred and inciting violence

0 +
-6

Frames viral content and online reactions as central, amplifying moral panic

0 +
-7

Frames social media as a primary driver of unrest and incitement

0 +
-7

Implies platforms and digital media strategies encourage shallow engagement and promotional noise over meaningful coverage

0 +
-7

Frames social media platforms as amplifiers of hate and drivers of civil unrest

0 +
-7

Strongly frames social media platforms and influencers as active instigators of real-world violence and racial division

0 +
-9

Frames social media as a battleground for moral polarization, amplifying online support for the killer without critique

0 +
+6

Portrays social media as a destructive force that amplifies misinterpretation and fuels celebrity conflict

0 +
-7

Frames social media as a tool for courageous truth-telling and advocacy despite online hate

0 +
+6

Reinforces social media as a platform for outrage and personal attacks

0 +
-5

Promotes digital activism and meme culture as effective tools for political expression and mobilization

0 +
+7

Portrays social media as inherently risky for children, justifying restrictive regulation

0 +
-4

Portrayed as inherently harmful to minors, requiring strict regulatory intervention

0 +
-6

Portrays social media as inherently harmful to children and in need of strict regulatory control

0 +
-7

Depicts social media as a tool for spreading hate and inciting violence

0 +
-7

Portrays social media as a dangerous platform requiring strict government intervention due to risks to minors.

0 +
-7

Frames social media platforms as inherently unsafe for minors and in need of strict regulatory oversight

0 +
-7

Strongly frames social media as enabling dangerous incitement and criminal behavior

0 +
-8

Minimizes the public impact of social media posts by emphasizing private context

0 +
+3

Portrays social media platforms as harmful, especially to children, and facing inevitable legal consequences.

0 +
-7

Portrays social media as a source of systemic harm requiring structural accountability

0 +
-6

Frames social media use as a tool for manipulation and public image crafting by criminals

0 +
-6

Promotes social media as the primary and unquestioned source of official government communication and legitimacy

0 +
+6

Framing portrays social media platforms as active enablers of incitement and misinformation

0 +
-8

Frames social media platforms as vectors for child exploitation and radicalization

0 +
-7

Portrays social media as a source of pressure and distortion in personal relationships

0 +
-5

Frames social media use as a tool for broadcasting criminal threats

0 +
-4

Critiques the normalization of public humiliation via social media

0 +
-8

Frames social media as a vector for spreading unverified and false claims

0 +
-7

Frames social media as a platform for inappropriate political appropriation of cultural content.

0 +
-5

Frames social media as a destructive force that amplifies racism and manipulates vulnerable populations

0 +
-7