Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results)
Portraying Trump's trade actions as economically beneficial without critical assessment of past outcomes
Chinese control of supply chains portrayed as harmful to U.S. economic interests
Trade prospects with China framed as highly beneficial and transformative for the US
Trade relationship framed as strained and uncertain
Economic dimensions of US-China relations downplayed, implying lesser legitimacy or relevance
The US-China trade relationship is framed as being in crisis, with ongoing tit-for-tat tariffs and economic conflict overshadowing cooperation.
Trade relationship framed under urgent pressure
Trade outcomes portrayed as modestly positive despite market skepticism
Trade outcomes framed as highly beneficial despite limited concrete results
Trade relationship framed as fragile and crisis-prone
Trade tensions framed as unresolved but temporarily paused
Trade relations framed as fragile, requiring urgent maintenance
Framed as moving toward resolution and progress, downplaying ongoing tensions
Trade with China framed as a major win for US farmers and industry
Trade relationship framed as unstable and in crisis
Trade relationship framed as fragile and high-pressure
framed as fragile and in need of new mechanisms like the 'Board of Trade' to avoid escalation
Global trade and supply chains framed as disrupted and harmful to local populations due to regional conflict
China's economic advancement framed as harmful to U.S. interests, rooted in theft rather than fair competition.
Trade relations framed as unstable and subject to geopolitical volatility
Portrays U.S. trade policy under Trump as harmful and counterproductive
Trump’s trade strategy framed as highly effective in reducing dependence on China
U.S. trade policy environment framed as a high-stakes crisis under threat from foreign competition
China-Iran trade relationship framed as harmful and lopsided
Chinese economic engagement framed as harmful to U.S. technological and economic interests
Framed as unstable and under strain due to unresolved disputes
The rise in UPF imports is framed as harmful to public health, implying trade patterns are contributing to a crisis
Trade talks framed as mutually beneficial despite underlying tensions
Trade relationship framed as fragile, dependent on symbolic gestures rather than durable agreements
Trade talks framed as potentially harmful to Taiwan’s security interests
Chinese investment portrayed as potentially harmful to American industries
U.S.-China trade relations framed as a failing struggle for survival rather than mutual economic engagement
Global trade portrayed as under threat due to geopolitical conflict in strategic waterways
US trade strategy portrayed as highly effective
Trade war framed as economically destructive for China
Framed as being in crisis due to stalled deals and conflicting regulatory demands
US-China trade framed as unstable and in need of urgent resolution
Defense trade portrayed as unstable and vulnerable to political interference
Tariffs are framed as economically harmful policy choices that directly contribute to inflation
Framing US-China trade discussions as mutually beneficial and progressing
Framed as potentially beneficial through trade deals and economic diplomacy
U.S. trade inquiry framed as selectively applied and illegitimate
Tariffs framed as damaging to both U.S. and Canadian economies
US-China trade relationship framed as unstable and crisis-prone due to Trump’s tariff policies
Framed as unstable and under strain
Trade relationship framed as fragile and in need of emergency management
Trade relationship framed as perpetually volatile and crisis-driven
Trade relationship framed as fragile and high-pressure
framed as persistently unstable and conflict-prone despite temporary truces
U.S.-China trade relationship framed as a crisis favoring China
portrayed as being in crisis and near collapse
China's trade positioning framed as beneficial and strategically advantageous
Trade relationship framed as existing in a state of crisis due to geopolitical conflict
Trade agreement framed as having limited but meaningful economic benefits
Tariffs framed as harmful and illegitimate, with refunds portrayed as a positive economic correction
Trade relations framed as unstable and crisis-driven
Framed as fragile and under pressure in the face of shifting trade dynamics
Globalization and trade with China framed as increasingly harmful to U.S. interests
US trade strategy portrayed as failing due to overreliance on tariffs and lack of leverage
Global trade framed as being in acute crisis due to Iranian actions
framed as unstable and under threat
Trade relations are framed as unstable and under pressure
Trade relations between US and China framed as being in crisis due to extreme tariff escalation
US-China trade talks framed as mutually beneficial despite ongoing conflict
Trade and Tariffs policy is framed as harmful to domestic consumers
Framed as beneficial for China to open to US business, implying US economic influence is inherently positive
Framing trade engagement with China as beneficial for US business interests
Portrays trade policy as creating economic crisis and uncertainty
Trade policy is framed as failing due to economic instability, supply chain risks, and uncertain long-term planning
Trade relationship framed as fragile but manageable, requiring high-level intervention to maintain truce
U.S.-China trade relationship framed as dysfunctional and unstable
Trade policy framed as reactive and destabilizing
Trade system framed in crisis due to blockade and rerouting
framed as a high-stakes, urgent confrontation rather than a managed negotiation
US trade policy framed as ineffective and reactive
Alcohol industry expansion framed as economically beneficial
Merger framed as beneficial for industry competition and consumer choice
Trade policy is being framed as malfunctioning due to legal rejection of tariffs
Trade with China framed as harmful to American economic interests
Trade mechanism portrayed as a pragmatic and functional approach to managing U.S.-China economic tensions
Trade policy portrayed as failing to curb fentanyl smuggling despite punitive tariffs
China's trade activity framed as resilient and strategically significant amid conflict
Trump's proposed fentanyl-related tariffs on Canada are framed as unjustified and not grounded in evidence
Framed as an unstable system vulnerable to geopolitical manipulation and price shocks
Trade policy is framed as being in crisis due to unanticipated economic consequences
Framing U.S.-China tech trade as stalled and uncertain
implying U.S. trade policy is dysfunctional and politically motivated
portraying trade relations as unstable and under imminent threat
Chinese economic practices framed as illegitimate and sanction-defying
U.S. tariffs on Chinese EVs framed as potentially harmful to consumer affordability and market competition
U.S.-China trade negotiations are framed as potentially harmful to Taiwan if used as leverage in great-power bargaining
portrayed as an ongoing crisis threatening the auto industry
US-China trade relationship framed as fragile and crisis-prone
Brazilian beef exports are framed as illegitimate due to non-compliance with EU standards
Trade is framed as transactional and insufficient to resolve deeper structural tensions
Tariff policy framed as legally unstable and under urgent judicial review
Tariff policy portrayed as functioning temporarily despite legal challenge
Tariff refunds are framed as a positive economic development for importers
Trade relations framed as fragile and under persistent threat
portrayed as legally unstable and poorly executed