Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results) — filtered
Immigration policy framed as potentially threatening to social cohesion
framed as harmful to equity and fairness
policy is failing and counterproductive
U.S. sanctions and pressure framed as harmful to Cuban civilians
Precarious immigration status increases vulnerability under proposed employment model
Sanctions regime framed as exclusionary and punitive against a British citizen
Humanitarian actors excluded and obstructed by state power
state-owned financial institutions framed as inherently failing
indirectly framed as enabling harmful activism through open society funding
Sanctions on Israel framed as a necessary moral action
Palestinians framed as systematically excluded and besieged
framed as an illegitimate exercise of state power in restricting movement
Immigration portrayed as a hostile threat due to association with serious crime
Immigration policy is framed as a hostile issue due to association with anti-migration candidates
immigration policy not directly discussed; signal not applicable
Immigration is framed as a burden through the inclusion of Thomas's 'inn is full' rhetoric
Framed as a threat requiring a 'stronger grip' on borders
Immigration enforcement framed as hostile and aggressive
implied connection between criminal justice reform and immigration reform as part of a broader 'left' agenda
Immigration is framed as a burden or threat through the inclusion of Thomas's 'the inn is full' rhetoric
Green Card seekers portrayed as a threat to immigration system integrity
Immigration framed as adversarial and threatening
US immigration enforcement is framed as hostile and externally imposed
Immigration policy is portrayed as endangering individuals' health and safety
Immigration policy is framed as failing due to lack of integration and rising social tension
implied critique of Israeli border enforcement as harmful
Naval blockade and interception operations portrayed as endangering civilians
Flotilla activists framed as excluded and humiliated
Solidarity activism implicitly framed as illegitimate by association with evasion tactics
Immigration enforcement used as a tool of political coercion, undermining trust
framed as part of a broader political crisis requiring public consultation
Irish activists framed as unjustly targeted and excluded
anti-violence programs are failing and mismanaged
Humanitarian flotilla framed as part of an urgent crisis response, not a security challenge
State action framed as harmful to humanitarian actors
Immigration policy framed as being in crisis due to uncontrolled inflows
Immigration framed as a growing concern requiring control
Immigration policy is framed as causing widespread harm to children
Immigration enforcement portrayed as endangering vulnerable individuals
Democratic immigration policies framed as adversarial to national interests and public sentiment
Frames anti-ICE cooperation policies as hostile to federal law enforcement
Immigration policy is framed as a confrontational, adversarial system focused on deterrence and criminalisation rather than protection or humanitarian response.
Immigration policy framed as exclusionary based on nationality and origin
Contrast between denied claims (e.g., ICE abuse) and rewarded claims (Jan. 6) used to frame selective injustice
Activists excluded from protection norms despite humanitarian mission
Irish activists framed as legitimate humanitarian actors deserving protection and solidarity
Activists implicitly framed as unjustly excluded and dehumanized
Framed as being in crisis or under urgent contention
Immigration policy is framed as failing to achieve its goals and creating unintended consequences
Liberal governance framed as failing due to bureaucratic inefficiency
Canada's asylum process is framed as rigid, unfair, and malfunctioning
Immigration policy is portrayed as endangering vulnerable individuals
Flotilla participants framed as excluded and mistreated despite peaceful intent
military's inclusion of permanent residents framed as progressive and unifying
immigration policy framed as non-urgent, manageable
Pro-Palestinian stance framed as inclusive community action
Implied contrast between harmful aid cuts and beneficial development cooperation, indirectly framing immigration drivers
Immigration policy framed as hostile and exclusionary
Green card applicants are framed as excluded from protection and belonging
Immigration policy is framed as harmful to vulnerable populations
Greenland’s sovereignty and autonomy framed as under threat from external annexation efforts
Frames Trump’s immigration claims as baseless and exaggerated
Immigrants framed as unsafe and under threat in public spaces
Youth desperation framed as driving dangerous migration attempts
Activists excluded from protection, treated as illegal entrants
Current policies are framed as causing direct harm to families and children
Traveller site development framed as an imminent threat to public order and safety
Israel’s detention and deportation policy framed as illegitimate
Wealth-linked migration is implicitly framed as an illegitimate form of influence over housing
Palestinians are being excluded from decision-making processes affecting their future
framed as excluding migrants from national belonging
The policy is framed as undermining an existing functional process by overburdening consular systems
The policy change is framed as causing harm through family separation and increased hardship for applicants
Immigration policy is framed as creating a systemic crisis due to expected processing overloads and prolonged family separations
Green card applicants portrayed as vulnerable and at risk
Immigration policy framed as hostile and exclusionary
Immigration policy framed as hostile and unjustified
Activists excluded from protections typically afforded to humanitarian actors
Immigration policy is framed as enabling dangerous criminal threats
Immigration portrayed as a threat to social cohesion
Birthright citizenship framed as harmful due to economic and exploitation concerns
Health protocols are used to justify exclusion of a national team
US legal and coercive actions against Cuba are implicitly framed as legitimate extensions of foreign policy, potentially justifying migration deterrence
Immigration controls framed as reactive rather than proactive
settlement expansion framed as legally illegitimate
Immigration policy is framed as harmful to regional communities due to cuts in regional visas
Implies systemic exclusion of non-English-speaking migrants, rendering them vulnerable to exploitation
Transgender people framed as excluded from women's history narrative
Immigration framed as exacerbating housing demand
Palestinian officials framed as vulnerable to exclusion through visa threats
Israel’s blockade and deportation policy framed as part of an ongoing crisis response
Immigration framed as a hostile force undermining community and burdening locals
The policy is framed as creating bureaucratic inefficiency and practical failure
Immigrants are framed as being pushed toward exclusion and marginalization
Immigration policy is portrayed as endangering immigrants' safety and stability
Immigration enforcement framed as adversarial and punitive
Immigrant communities portrayed as under heightened threat due to increased arrests
Immigration policy framed as hostile and confrontational under Trump administration
Settlement expansion framed as a violation of international law and illegitimate control
air travel framed as a security threat, not humanitarian access