Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results) — filtered
Cuba's energy policy is framed as failing to meet basic public needs
frames energy development and pipeline expansion as economically transformative and beneficial for national prosperity
framed as harmful to Alberta's economic interests under federal regulation
Energy project portrayed as threatening cultural and environmental integrity
Volcanic activity is framed primarily as a destructive threat rather than a natural geological process
Environmental harm caused by profit-driven practices
Energy policy is framed as beneficial for economic growth through export expansion and investor confidence
Energy Policy is framed as harmful due to its environmental impact
framed as highly beneficial and essential to national survival
The project is framed as an emergency-scale intervention in a fragile environment, not a routine development.
Russian energy infrastructure framed as a harmful enabler of war
Energy Policy framed as environmentally destructive
Energy infrastructure is framed as a priority for protection, contrasting with residential areas
Fossil fuel policy is framed as inherently harmful and politically problematic
Water pricing reform portrayed as harmful to household budgets
Frames California's energy policy as destructive and economically damaging
Large whale rescue efforts are portrayed as fundamentally ineffective and biologically unfeasible
framed as enabling harmful military byproducts like depleted uranium
fossil fuel expansion is framed as lacking legitimacy due to national security costs
Transition to clean energy is framed as beneficial and necessary for long-term resilience
Frames green energy policies as economically damaging
Renewable energy framed as a beneficial, morally urgent alternative to fossil fuels
clean energy policy framed as undermined by contradictory government actions
Fossil fuel energy policy is framed as harmful and in need of phaseout
Energy supply disruptions framed as harmful to global economy
Framed as environmentally threatening due to fragile ecosystems at risk
The Alberta oil pipeline agreement is framed as environmentally damaging
Energy transition framed as environmentally necessary and beneficial
Energy policy framed as crisis-level imbalance due to data centre demand
State energy policy is framed as failing to protect consumers
The ecological situation is framed as a crisis requiring urgent intervention
Framing environmental water flows as beneficial to ecosystems and communities
Framing environmental water flows as a justified and necessary policy
framed as potentially beneficial through sovereign wealth investment
Framed as environmentally costly but necessary for clean energy future
Implied failure of climate mitigation efforts in preventing extreme events
Water storage project framed as environmentally damaging and outdated
portrayed as environmentally at risk due to project revival
Mining framed as environmentally destructive and dangerous
WA's future gas supply is at serious risk
policy implementation is failing despite sound principles
Air pollution controls framed as having harmful climate side effects
Energy policy portrayed as endangering vulnerable species
Shift toward renewable energy is framed as a beneficial development that has meaningfully reduced worst-case climate outcomes
framed as harmful to economic growth
National climate modelling infrastructure is portrayed as being degraded, undermining effective policy planning
framed as a source of global economic harm due to disrupted oil and gas flows
National energy policy framed as short-termist and failing due to political turnover
Environmental sustainability is mentioned but not substantively engaged, implying weak framing of green credentials
Nuclear energy framed as vulnerable and risky in conflict zones
Framing LNG expansion as economically beneficial and progressing positively
Energy policy outcomes framed as morally ambiguous due to reliance on Russian fossil fuels
Global energy markets framed in a state of crisis due to Middle East turmoil
Energy policy framed as potentially harmful due to expanded natural gas use
Cuban energy system framed as completely failed despite renewable investments
Pesticide use framed as causing extensive ecological damage
Energy policy framed as being in a state of emergency
Industrial development framed as hostile to Indigenous territory and health
framed as being in crisis due to political opposition to North Sea drilling, risking jobs and energy security
framed as a hostile force to ecological protection
Implied framing of medium-density housing as beneficial for urban sustainability and efficiency
framing as posing environmental risk, particularly to groundwater
Environmental regulation is framed as economically burdensome and ineffective
Fragile alpine environment is under threat from feral horses
Alberta to hold consultation sessions this year on future plans for dealing with oilsands tailings …
Suggesting past government inaction undermined environmental accountability
Alberta to hold consultation sessions this year on future plans for dealing with oilsands tailings …
Framing tailings management as posing ongoing environmental and health risks
framed as failing and driving up consumer costs
renewables project portrayed as mismanaged and wasteful
implied association between military uranium use and environmental contamination
Fossil fuel production is framed as harmful and legally questionable
Framing aggressive energy development as economically beneficial and necessary
Energy policy is framed as a source of long-term environmental and economic benefit
Public ownership of essential utilities, including water, is framed as a beneficial and necessary reform
Framing a shift away from Middle East oil toward renewables and nuclear as a beneficial long-term response
Biden-era refrigerant regulations are framed as ineffective and legally overreaching
Biden-era environmental regulations framed as being rolled back without clear consumer benefit
Car use is framed as an adversary to sustainable urban development and efficient land use
Energy Policy is framed as delivering economic benefits through federal investment and job-creating projects
Energy development is framed as inherently beneficial, downplaying environmental trade-offs
Environmental transition (peat-free policy) framed as ecologically necessary and responsible
policy portrayed as corrupt or self-serving due to lack of transparency in fund usage
low-emission zones portrayed as harmful financial schemes rather than beneficial environmental measures
energy and climate policy portrayed in state of crisis
Current energy policy framed as actively harmful to climate and public interest
Energy infrastructure expansion is portrayed as endangering climate stability
Climate advocacy is portrayed as harmful and misleading
Green energy advocates framed as hostile adversaries to gas industry
Gas development is framed as beneficial for national economic return and energy security
Energy policy framed as being in crisis due to instability and underperformance
Export tax framed as harmful to economic interests
Restructuring may harm long-term climate modelling essential for policy and adaptation
National climate research infrastructure is framed as failing due to underfunding and lack of clear mandate
Italy's energy policy is framed as failing due to political inertia and lack of implementation
Liberal leader Angus Taylor spruiks gas extraction in Adelaide as SA party opposes fracking proposal
Framing fracking as a threat to environmental safety, particularly aquifers
Liberal leader Angus Taylor spruiks gas extraction in Adelaide as SA party opposes fracking proposal
Framing gas extraction as beneficial for investment and economic activity
The dam project is framed as environmentally damaging and outdated
Project framed as ecological emergency
indirectly framed as beneficial due to Greenland’s strategic resources
framed as vulnerable and failing under geopolitical stress
energy transition framed as harmful to consumers