Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (99 results) — filtered
Public spending framed as potentially wasteful due to cost overrun
Government economic management is framed as ineffective and overwhelmed
Government fiscal management is framed as reaching a tipping point and unable to absorb further shocks
Framed as wasteful and destructive due to war costs
Public spending on RTÉ is implicitly framed as potentially wasteful or mismanaged
Framing government spending on childcare as wasteful and corrupting
Public funding of RTÉ is implicitly framed as being misused
Public investment in housing regeneration framed as inefficient and stalled
Public spending on animal shelters is framed as corrupt and misused for private profit
Government cost-saving measures framed as undermining programme effectiveness
government framing of programme as more fiscally responsible and efficient
Framed as wasteful or questionable use of public funds
Frames infrastructure funding as at risk due to proposed tax suspension
Government infrastructure funding is framed as at risk due to fiscal trade-offs
Portrayed as a harmful diversion of public assets from public benefit
Executive order framed as imposing harmful administrative costs on public institutions
Framed as wasteful and misaligned with public interest
Public spending on homelessness is portrayed as harmful and wasteful
Public spending on the war is framed as wasteful and damaging to national priorities
Data collection on sexual orientation is framed as beneficial for equitable allocation of public resources
Public funding of monarchy questioned in terms of value and opportunity cost
Federal infrastructure spending portrayed as uneven and ineffective for WA
public spending on media coverage framed as potentially wasteful
Use of public funds to oppose appeals framed as harmful misuse of taxpayer money
Budget decision framed as illegitimate despite fiscal surplus claims
public spending on infrastructure is portrayed as wasteful and economically damaging due to delays
Public spending decision framed as financially harmful due to significant overspend
state spending portrayed as fiscally irresponsible and poorly managed
Framing government fiscal support as insufficient relative to hospital needs
framed as beneficial but conditional, emphasizing efficiency and accountability
framed as insufficient and failing to meet global humanitarian needs
Public services are implicitly framed as under strain due to dissatisfaction with government handling of fuel crisis
Framing public spending (via Medicaid) as vulnerable to fraud and misuse
Public spending on golf course raises transparency concerns
Public spending decisions on vasectomy services framed as misinformed and counterproductive
current spending framed as wasteful and ineffective, especially under Labour
Implied that pay rises for doctors are a reactive cost driven by strikes, not strategic investment
government spending framed as wasteful and inefficient
Federal spending on education is implicitly framed as wasteful and harmful due to its association with a 'failed bureaucracy.'
Framing school board spending as mismanaged and ineffective
State economic model framed as reliant on forced labor under strain
Government spending framed as effective in producing rapid results
Public funds portrayed as endangered by systemic benefit fraud
The £369 million renovation is framed as potentially wasted public money due to royal inaction
Public spending on infrastructure is portrayed as poorly managed and inefficient
Frames increased public spending as potentially harmful and destabilizing to the economy
Framing public spending on services as beneficial to workers and society
portrayed as harmful and unsustainable
Public investment in Palace refit framed as potentially wasted
Framing public funding of Black cultural institutions as illegitimate or politically motivated
Public spending is framed with skepticism due to termination of funding over serious allegations
framing taxpayer funding as being misused for immoral and unnecessary purposes
portrayed as illegitimate use of public funds for private misconduct
public spending portrayed as effective and urgently responsive
public spending framed as wasteful and poorly managed
State spending on the facility is portrayed as wasteful and mismanaged
Government infrastructure funding portrayed as in crisis due to outdated tax policy
Public education spending framed as wasteful and ineffective
Pension underfunding is framed as harmful to vulnerable retirees despite financial recovery
Framing state spending as contributing to fiscal crisis
Frames pension changes as fiscally irresponsible and harmful to public finances
Funding cuts are portrayed as actively harmful to scientific progress and child survival
Framing past public spending as excessive and poorly managed
Government spending on medicines framed as inadequate and failing
Public spending on steel nationalisation and NHS modernisation is framed as beneficial and necessary investment
EU funds framed as essential for economic recovery and investment
Framing public spending under Mamdani as wasteful and harmful to future generations
Public funds framed as misused for partisan gain
Public spending priorities are questioned as misaligned with veteran needs
Implied threat to fiscal stability due to political uncertainty, though underreported
Public spending on infrastructure is framed as being hindered by unpredictable legal costs, now being corrected
Framing legal expenditures as wasteful and avoidable
Framed as harmed by unnecessary legal costs
Public spending is portrayed as fundamentally broken and inefficient
Crown funding portrayed as insufficient for state-owned enterprise growth
Public spending on private nursing contracts is framed as harmful to public health system sustainability
Public infrastructure spending portrayed as reactive and wasteful due to preventable disaster
Government spending framed as inherently wasteful; austerity as necessary good
state spending under incumbent framed as ethically questionable
portrayed as fiscally harmful and wasteful
Public spending framed as destructive and unsustainable
Public finances framed as mismanaged due to political instability
Framed as wasteful and misaligned with public priorities
public funds portrayed as misallocated during cost-of-living crisis
Framing increased public spending as necessary and beneficial for public safety
Public spending decisions are framed with suspicion of fiscal irresponsibility
Highlights significant cost overruns and inefficiency in government spending
Project framed as wasteful and financially irresponsible
Government spending on HAP is portrayed as wasteful and harmful to public finances
Government fiscal response framed as inadequate and poorly targeted
Framing underfunding and lack of support as harmful to student attendance and success
Use of public funds framed as potentially corrupt and wasteful
Public Spending is framed as being in crisis due to potential disruption of Highway Trust Fund revenue
Public investment being wasted due to administrative delays
Public spending on infrastructure framed as at risk from gas tax suspension
Implies fiscal policy is in crisis mode, justifying emergency intervention
Implies fiscal strain on infrastructure funding
Public spending decisions failing to keep pace with workforce evolution
Suspension of gas tax framed as fiscally irresponsible