Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results)
Citizenship process framed as under threat requiring urgent, escalated enforcement
UK Government is framed as adversarial to Sullivan and aligned with accountability
Government's handling of the issue framed as reactive and under pressure
Ireland framed as reluctant or obstructive partner in EU foreign policy alignment
U.S. government portrayed as untransparent in its vetting process
The US government (under Trump) is framed as untrustworthy in handling scientific evidence
government accused of suppressing science for commercial interests
Undermining the legitimacy of party leadership and governance
Portrays the Minister’s funding threat as adversarial, undermining institutional autonomy
The government is framed as untrustworthy for delaying victim access to the report and refusing a meeting
Trust mechanism and oversight implied as potentially corrupt or misused
Federal and provincial legislative action is framed as a legitimate and necessary response
Undermines the legitimacy of New Jersey’s governance during the pandemic recovery period
Frames New Jersey's unemployment administration as failing and incompetent
Portrays New Jersey state leadership as corrupt and negligent in handling public funds
The US government is portrayed as effectively restoring election integrity
Corporate media leadership framed as adversarial to journalistic integrity
Portrayed as failing to deliver effective support despite funding commitments
Government portrayed as failing to act on promised reforms despite public backlash
Policy change framed as a moment of national debate rather than routine adjustment
Government decision-making portrayed with mild suspicion due to lack of transparency
Ireland framed as distancing itself from international cooperation
Government portrayed as competent and proactive in reforming outdated deployment procedures
Ireland framed as a proactive international partner willing to act independently of UN veto powers
Institute for Government framed as an ideological adversary in the culture war
Government use of safety rhetoric is framed as adversarial to individual freedom and democratic discourse
perceived as lacking transparency and excluding public input
Federal immigration authorities are portrayed as untrustworthy due to potential overreach and lack of transparency
Council action framed as proactive but contested
HSE leadership is framed as untrustworthy for rejecting Labour Court recommendation
Government is framed as failing in its duty of care
framed as potentially complicit due to political connections
Government framed as untrustworthy and dismissive of survivors
State employer (HSE) framed as untrustworthy for breaking long-standing agreement and ignoring arbitration
government operations portrayed as mismanaged and inefficient
Government space agency portrayed as failing in equity commitments despite technical progress
government is downplaying scientific evidence due to commercial pressure
Federal immigration operations are framed as lacking proper legitimacy and oversight
Regulatory process framed as a looming obstacle, implying systemic delay
US government portrayed as untrustworthy due to alleged suppression of scientific findings
US government actions seen as undermining accountability
government framed as adversarial to victims’ interests and public trust
Framed as adversarial toward national agency in defending local interests
Implied criticism of government decision-making as short-sighted or poorly informed
The Trump administration is portrayed as adversarial toward naturalized citizens, using legal mechanisms as enforcement tools
US Government is portrayed as effectively enforcing citizenship standards
Government policy portrayed as failing housing market stability
framed as responsive and effective in upgrading security
U.S. government economic and tax policy is framed as failing to address inequality and instead exacerbating it by favoring the wealthy.
Kenyan government portrayed as untrustworthy for defying court orders and enabling foreign interests
Government procurement process framed as failing due to lack of competition and transparency
Local government official framed as a moral adversary to community trust
The administration's handling of energy and economic policy is framed as inadequate amid rising costs.
US military and government portrayed as competent and reliable
Implies governmental failure to hold powerful figures accountable
portrayed as deliberately excluded from governance practices
portrayed as untrustworthy and resistant to accountability
Cross-border movement from Ireland framed as a vulnerability
Implied institutional failure in managing team conduct and enforcing protocols
Government is failing to deliver meaningful legislation
U.S. immigration processes are portrayed as failing to accommodate legitimate international roles
Portraying US military as competent and transparent through successful rescue
Local political circles are framed as complicit through inaction
portrayed as involved in potential corruption and pay-to-play dynamics
Government response to climate and health risks is framed as inadequate and regressive
elected local leadership framed as illegitimate and ineffective compared to state-appointed managers
state intervention portrayed as highly effective in fixing failing systems
Portrays the US government as corrupt or compromised by partisan actors
US framed as cooperative ally in regional security
Government portrayed as effectively enforcing compliance
Frames the government as an adversary to hospital autonomy and patient interests
Institutional governance portrayed as failing to protect vulnerable individuals and slow to act on serious allegations
election administration portrayed as failing due to lack of verification
U.S. government portrayed as unresponsive and lacking transparency
Federal government and ISC are framed as untrustworthy in delivering on commitments
Framed as politically aligned with and enabling a controversial civil rights group
The government (via the Minister) is framed as adversarial in its response, prioritizing compliance over dialogue
US government actions are portrayed as lacking transparency and accountability in immigration decisions
Government response to AI is framed as potentially reactive, poorly informed, and at risk of enacting rigid labor protections
School authorities framed as untrustworthy in handling speech
Illegitimate
Untrustworthy
Failing
city government framed as an active adversary to small landlords
Federal government, particularly under Trump, framed as exerting undue influence on media
Judicial decisions framed as illegitimate and politically motivated
Government operations framed as under internal threat
State government action is framed as procedurally illegitimate due to lack of due process
Local government planning process depicted as slow and inconsistent
US Government institutions framed as susceptible to internal fraud and deception at high levels
City government portrayed as untrustworthy in contract enforcement
The state's role in privileging marriage is questioned as illegitimate and rooted in patriarchal control
US Government portrayed as complicit in unlawful actions through omission of its role in assassinating Iran's Supreme Leader
government spending questioned in terms of value for money
UK finances portrayed as under severe threat of collapse
Undermining legitimacy of US foreign policy through implication in illegal war
State authority is framed as failing in its security and development responsibilities
Government’s vetting process presented without sufficient transparency, raising implied distrust
U.S. immigration enforcement portrayed as opaque and unaccountable despite official statements
Government policy framed as ineffective and prioritizing wrong reforms