Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (71 results) — filtered
Energy infrastructure expansion portrayed as environmentally risky
Environmental monitoring is portrayed as inadequate and leaving ecosystems at risk
National climate adaptation policy is framed as ineffective due to funding gaps and political delays
High energy costs framed as a systemic failure hindering European tech competitiveness
Data centers framed as posing environmental risks to local resources
Data center energy and water use framed as harmful to environmental sustainability
Framing the environment as under threat from development
framed as vulnerable and under threat
The environment is portrayed as under imminent and severe threat from development
framed as under threat from datacenter energy demands
Climate and energy policies framed as harmful, ideologically driven, and economically destructive
pipeline project framed as environmentally risky and economically threatening to coastal regions
Russian energy infrastructure framed as a harmful enabler of war
Groundwater resources are portrayed as under threat from mining operations
Energy policy framed as contributing to environmental danger
Consolidated local governance is framed as detrimental to effective management of environmental infrastructure like water systems
Framing drilling and mining as harmful to marine ecosystems
Hunting framed as beneficial for ecosystem balance, despite lack of verification
Energy policy is framed as failing due to delays in offshore wind projects
EU data centre expansion framed as potentially harmful to climate goals
Energy policy framed as vulnerable to external shocks and poor planning
Framing the environment as under threat from development
Fossil fuel use is framed as directly responsible for increased heatwave lethality
Offshore wind development framed as a positive driver for marine focus
Current energy and climate systems are implicitly framed as contributing to harmful global disruptions
Iran's control of Hormuz framed as harmful to global energy stability
Regulatory and permitting processes are framed as adversaries to energy security and affordability
Energy policy is framed as failing due to insufficient supply and slow development
Environmental policy portrayed as endangering a heritage species
Australia's reliance on imported fuel is framed as a structural vulnerability requiring urgent policy response
Domestic energy production framed as beneficial, aligned with Trump’s policies
framed as harmful to global energy stability
Framing oil infrastructure operations as endangering ecosystems and communities
energy supply framed as being in crisis due to geopolitical conflict
Energy infrastructure development framed as environmentally destructive
Energy system portrayed in crisis due to unregulated data center expansion
Funding cuts are framed as harmful to environmental research infrastructure and long-term climate understanding
framing energy infrastructure as endangering rural tranquility and natural habitats
Fossil fuel interests are framed as adversaries to environmental monitoring and climate science
Energy Policy is framed as adversarial to environmental protection goals
Energy Policy is framed as beneficial for economic development and global market integration
Framing environmental concerns as absent or irrelevant to energy development
Framing grizzly bears as hostile or dangerous actors rather than ecological contributors
Framing the environment as under threat from potential reintroduction risks
Framing the fuel terminal as an environmental hazard
framing wastewater discharge as environmentally destructive
Energy transition policy framed as economically risky
Data centers framed as endangering community water safety
Portrays climate-driven energy policy as harmful and regressive
Environmental contamination downplayed despite fuel leak into water cisterns
framed as an ongoing, high-stakes negotiation under public scrutiny
portrayed as generating inequitable outcomes between provinces
Global energy policy responses framed as insufficient against mounting supply risks
Energy markets framed as vulnerable to geopolitical shocks, implying instability in supply and policy
Fossil fuel use is implicitly framed as a harmful driver exacerbating climate crises
Energy infrastructure upgrades framed as occurring amid a crisis of security vulnerability
Energy infrastructure is portrayed as vulnerable and under potential threat from hostile drones
framed as dangerously misguided and life-threatening
Portraying current energy policy (toward net zero) as economically effective and productive
Environmental safety of the National Mall is portrayed as compromised
U.S. control over oil revenues framed as illegitimate colonial administration
The spill incident frames the National Mall's environmental safety as compromised due to event operations.
Framed as under threat from industrial activity
marine environment portrayed as vulnerable to contamination
net zero transition framed as poorly implemented and harmful to farmers
Environmental policy dismissed as low-priority compared to public order
Renewables and battery storage are portrayed as a successful and effective solution to energy market failures
Framed as ineffective, with climate initiatives being undermined or reversed
Framed as under threat and disruptive
Extractive industries linked to silicon and rare earths framed as having hidden human costs
Energy policy framed as potentially harmful to ecosystems