Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results) — filtered
military actions under Gabbard framed as effective and protective
Israeli military operation framed as illegitimate and unlawful
Ongoing conflict and brinkmanship framed as a persistent crisis despite ceasefire
Military situation framed as being on the brink of resolution, overstating diplomatic progress
Framed as perpetually on the brink of massive escalation
Framing the situation as an ongoing crisis with high risk of renewed war
Military action framed as ongoing crisis with high risk of escalation
U.S. military personnel framed as recklessly endangered
Military conflict framed as ongoing and precarious despite ceasefire
Civilian infrastructure and populations portrayed as under persistent threat
The military is framed as failing due to ideological capture and weakened standards
Framed as ongoing threat to regional stability and civilian safety, despite official claims
Framed as lacking proper authorization and process
Military personnel portrayed as endangered due to corporate actions
framed as perpetually on the brink of escalation
Renewed U.S. military action framed as a necessary and strategically beneficial tool to force Iranian compliance
framed as an ongoing national crisis requiring urgent response
Greenland portrayed as under military threat from U.S. ambitions
Ukrainian military actions framed as legitimate strategic operations
Frames capital punishment as a normalized, routine state action rather than a grave or exceptional event
Cuban military action is portrayed as illegitimate and criminal
Military action in Iran framed as an urgent, high-demand operation requiring resource reallocation
Military action in Iran framed as adversarial and high-stakes
Military action framed as ongoing crisis requiring urgent congressional oversight
Situation framed as escalating toward imminent military crisis
Ukrainian drone warfare framed as highly effective and transformative on the battlefield
Violence against the team is framed as hostile and aggressive
Ongoing war in the Middle East framed as a persistent, economy-damaging crisis
Ongoing hostilities downplayed, implying stability despite active conflict
Military posture framed as erratic and reactive rather than stable
Foreign activists portrayed as vulnerable victims of excessive state force
military diplomacy portrayed as performative and insecure
Framing Côte d’Ivoire as a cooperative ally in regional counterinsurgency
Military action in Cuba framed as imminent and necessary
US military deployments are portrayed as disorganized and poorly coordinated
Situation framed as urgent and ongoing crisis
The ceasefire and regional stability are portrayed as fragile and under threat
Cuban military action is portrayed as deliberately harmful
Situation framed as requiring urgent, dramatic military intervention
Regional dynamics framed in crisis mode due to U.S.-Iran war and energy fallout
Ongoing war framed as a persistent crisis requiring urgent political response
Framing of U.S.-China tensions as escalating toward crisis
Situation framed as perpetually on the brink of renewed war
Military escalation framed as inevitable and urgent
UK and NATO portrayed as vulnerable and underprepared for military threat
Occupied civilian infrastructure portrayed as endangered
Framed as operating in a state of urgent crisis requiring resource prioritization
Military conflict framed as an ongoing crisis with domestic spillover
Framing military action as a source of civilian harm and disappearance
framed as an ongoing, escalating crisis with high risk of renewed war
framed as ideologically hostile through far-right martial ethos
military recruitment system framed as reformed and functioning more efficiently
military service framed as a protective response to perceived global instability
U.S.-Iran relations framed in a state of ongoing crisis
Military actions framed as escalating and in crisis phase, with near-daily attacks
Military intervention in Cuba is framed as imminent and justified, creating a sense of crisis
Regional security framed as unstable due to U.S. policy unpredictability
Military action framed as harmful and economically damaging
Military action against Cuba framed as imminent and urgent
framed as an illegitimate extension of U.S. strategic presence lacking diplomatic credibility
Portrays US military action against Iran as overstated in success
portrayed as causing collateral harm
portrayed as illegal, unauthorized, and criminal
framed as urgent crisis requiring resource sovereignty to ensure national survival
framed as illegitimate and driven by hard-line actors rather than state policy or self-defense
Framed as an ongoing, uncontrolled crisis
Ukraine is portrayed as still under threat due to ongoing war, justifying urgent EU integration
Military action in Iran framed as lacking legal and democratic legitimacy
Military commemoration space framed as endangered by political monument
Framing military action as hostile and retaliatory
Military force framed as inherently destructive and seductive
Secession is framed as a potential crisis requiring military and constitutional reorganization
Russian air defences framed as overwhelmed despite high interception numbers
Situation in southern and central Russia framed as escalating crisis under sustained attack
Military drone use framed as beneficial for logistics and soldier safety
Israeli military interception framed as unlawful and criminal
Military action against Iran framed as a high-stakes, unstable crisis
framed as adversarial to national heritage and solemn military commemoration
framed as an escalating crisis with urgent military and diplomatic stakes
Arlington National Cemetery’s sanctity framed as threatened
Military families framed as excluded from justice and government support despite sacrifice
The situation in the Strait of Hormuz is framed as an escalating crisis requiring urgent decision-making
US military posture portrayed as chaotic and inconsistent
Military deployment framed as urgent and decisive, bypassing normal procedural stability
Armed conflict is framed as a destabilizing force exacerbating the health crisis
Military decision-making portrayed as politicized and lacking integrity
Rebel-controlled areas are portrayed as zones of uncontrollable crisis
West Bank situation framed as escalating crisis
Undermining legitimacy of royal diplomatic roles by associating them with personal privilege
Framing football governance as descending into chaotic, unstable crisis
framed as ongoing, urgent crisis due to Israeli violations
The military conflict is framed as an ongoing, unstable crisis with no clear resolution
Military escalation framed as imminent and inevitable if diplomacy fails
framed as an ongoing, high-stakes crisis requiring urgent resolution
framed as an escalating crisis
framed as adversarial due to sharing sensitive information
Quad partnership framed as weakening due to lack of high-level engagement
framed as illegitimate due to internal dissent and contradiction with intelligence assessments
Framing the Strait of Hormuz as a site of ongoing crisis and instability
India framed as geopolitically threatened by U.S. engagement with rivals like Pakistan and Iran