Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results)
Public reaction to a sports event is framed as descending into political chaos due to media and celebrity incitement
Framing promotes long-term public spending on housing as economically beneficial compared to repeated crisis intervention
Public health system failing to deliver on integrated housing and mental health support
Public safety is framed as being in ongoing crisis due to structural instability and lack of resolution
Community safety portrayed as severely compromised by industrial risk
Government spending portrayed as rife with waste, fraud, and lack of accountability under Democratic administration
GOP portrayed as strategically repositioning to address voter concerns despite legislative underperformance
public narrative shaped to condemn rather than inform
framed as descending into political outrage over a cultural event
The incident is framed as a moment of urban crisis and breakdown
The public is portrayed as being in danger due to mob violence
Public discussion of celebrity lives framed as intrusive and baseless
portrayed as receiving outsized access and financial influence from private interests
Preservationists framed as excluded from decision-making process
Public Health is framed as being at risk due to inadequate post-release medical oversight
public funds may be misused if consultants perform private work
public patients' access to equitable care is under threat
Framing policy changes as potentially harmful to future public health outcomes
Public health systems in Pacific nations framed as overwhelmed and failing to contain HIV
Private behavior framed as triggering public moral crisis
Public ownership of water framed as a legitimate and necessary alternative
Implied critique of New Zealand’s defence spending as inadequate
public conversation on addiction framed as harmful and politicized
public investment in stadiums framed as fiscally irresponsible
Increased infrastructure spending is framed as a necessary and beneficial investment
Patient safety framed as potentially threatened by private care arrangements
Local disagreement escalated into a crisis of public safety and online harassment
Restoration of national symbol framed as resolving a visually notable disruption
framing general population as excluded from effective heat protection
Implied failure in healthcare governance due to contractual non-compliance at a major maternity hospital
MP accommodation allowances are framed as illegitimate when used in self-dealing arrangements
framed as hostile to democratic norms and aligned with Trump over public interest
The cultural conversation around sexual violence is framed as being in a state of urgent evolution and crisis response
Public spending portrayed as being wasted due to erratic decision-making
Online discourse framed as harmful and contributing to misogyny
Royal spending framed as harmful to public finances
public funds perceived as being used to support private royal benefits
Public squares are portrayed as under siege and violated by private event
royal housing arrangements framed as harmful to public finances
Public funding of transport scheme implicitly questioned due to safety failures
OSAP spending controls portrayed as misdirected
Frames cultural events as under threat from elitism and political division
Framing royal housing privileges as harmful misuse of public funds
Implied that public health approaches may be failing if individuals rely on consumer products over professional support
Increased funding for cyber security implicitly framed as a necessary and positive response
Framing the Republican Party as complicit and hypocritical for opposing the $1.8 billion fund but remaining silent on Trump’s personal audit immunity
public spending on royal residences framed as potentially corrupt or unjustified
Use of public funds for private services framed as harmful misuse
Public patients' access to equitable care portrayed as threatened
public health portrayed as at risk due to system flaws
Online public discourse framed as illegitimate and dangerous due to harassment campaigns and vigilante rhetoric
Public safety is framed as being at risk due to poor regulation and driver working conditions
Republican candidates portrayed as losing ground and underperforming
Private patients subtly framed as privileged group
Republican Party framed as cultural defender
framed as culturally adversarial
Public discourse is framed as being in a state of moral panic and overreaction
Implies public finances are at risk despite clarification of private funding
framed as scientifically sound and ethically responsible in limiting screening
Framed as wasteful and misdirected
Framed as internally divided and under strain
Republican Party portrayed as in internal crisis ahead of elections
framed as under threat from unregulated energy drink access among teens
framed as internally divided and adversarial
The Republican Party is framed as institutionally adversarial toward LGBTQ+ cultural expression
Public discourse is framed as broken, toxic, and dominated by extremism and online harassment
Portrays the Republican Party as internally divided and in crisis
Republican Party is framed as corrupt and self-serving, prioritizing Trump over public interest
Care system portrayed as increasingly unsafe for vulnerable disabled individuals
Public representatives framed as under serious personal threat
framed as being in moral crisis due to cultural insensitivity
Rugby media discourse framed as being in crisis or unbalanced
Republican Party portrayed as prioritizing loyalty to Trump over institutional norms
Framed as protecting public patients from elite private interests
public health system portrayed as vulnerable and compromised
Public funds portrayed as at risk due to opaque royal leasing
Civic engagement framed as failing due to public apathy
Public health portrayed as under threat from exotic disease
Framed as facing an urgent political crisis due to economic fallout
Framing public health response as failing due to delayed detection
Public health authority is framed as illegitimate and politically motivated
Public health institutions are portrayed as corrupt and dishonest
Historical public health and welfare systems implied as failing in child care and burial practices
Discussion of natural animal sexuality is framed as something previously excluded due to taboo, now being included in open scientific conversation
Public maternity care framed as equally beneficial and safe as private care
Public spending framed as being misused due to consultant private practice
Public conversation framed as chaotic and unjust
public access to court records is framed as beneficial for transparency and democratic accountability
AIPAC framed as a corrupting, manipulative lobbying force undermining democratic debate
Framing public understanding of historical abuse as an ongoing crisis requiring excavation-driven revelation
Public spending framed as harmful and misdirected toward political favors rather than public good
Republican Party portrayed as in crisis due to internal divisions and electoral vulnerability over controversial funding
framed as an antagonistic force undermining democracy
Public health system portrayed as failing due to delayed communication and lack of transparency
Public criticism of Zverev framed as morally justified and legitimate
Public discourse on colonial memory framed as urgent and in crisis
National identity debate is framed as escalating toward societal fracture
framed as internally divided and fractured
Republican figures portrayed as unified allies against institutional abuse
Republican Party (via Trump) framed as corrupt and destructive to democratic norms