Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (46 results)
HDC portrayed as taking strong, justified action in absence of regulation
Indigenous people framed as disproportionately excluded from safety in custody
Intellectually disabled individuals framed as excluded from effective healthcare advocacy and systemic protection
Government is framed as untrustworthy in its treatment of Indigenous communities
Indigenous communities framed as excluded from adequate housing and aged care support
Indigenous women are framed as systematically excluded and targeted by institutional practices
Indigenous families and communities are framed as being excluded from decision-making and targeted by policy
Lollipop people are framed as deserving of societal protection and respect
Lollipop people are portrayed as physically endangered by drivers
Indigenous community acknowledged through liaison efforts and content warning
Indigenous groups are acknowledged as potential opponents but not as rights-holders or partners
People with obesity are framed as systematically excluded from public spaces
Indigenous families are framed as historically excluded from equitable child protection due to systemic fears
Framing Indigenous children as previously excluded from full protection due to cultural considerations
Disabled people are framed as adversaries by employers due to suspicion and surveillance
Disabled people are portrayed as unfairly excluded and targeted due to assumptions about their condition
Wealthy individuals framed as excluded, scapegoated, and under attack
associating disability with potential fraud
Indigenous people portrayed as systematically marginalized in public safety systems
People who use drugs are framed as being abandoned and dehumanized by policy
Indigenous cultural expression is framed as being at risk of exclusion or censorship under the new directive
Framing disabled people as being at risk of exclusion due to tightened eligibility
Framing of victim’s autism status risks othering, though cited for clinical context
Indigenous Peoples, specifically the Yindjibarndi, are framed as historically excluded but now finally recognized and protected through legal validation
Indigenous group is portrayed as rightfully recognised and compensated for cultural loss
Indigenous community is acknowledged and included in healing efforts
Historical academic practices framed as adversarial toward Indigenous communities
Framed as legally and morally dubious
University's compliance with disability law framed as illegitimate and dismissive
implied to be victims of systemic fraud, deserving of protection and proper allocation of resources
Framed as systematically excluded from equal protection
Framed as deeply endangered due to systemic neglect
Indigenous children are framed as systematically excluded from safety and protection
framed as adversaries to fair public systems
portrayed as easily abused and not based on verified need
Framing Indigenous communities as being included and empowered in self-determination of child welfare systems
Unhoused individuals portrayed as threats and outsiders
Disabled individuals framed as excluded and mistreated in detention
Indigenous Peoples are portrayed as central stakeholders with legitimate agency in policy decisions
portrayed as marginalized in national economic planning
Indigenous Peoples framed as historically excluded and colonized, deserving of recognition and inclusion
Young people framed as historically excluded but now being protected
Indigenous Peoples are framed as historically excluded but now being rightfully included in legal and land rights
Worker with disability is portrayed as psychologically and professionally endangered by institutional overreach
Workplace disability accommodation processes are framed as failing due to overreach and harm
Disability community is being included and validated through legal recognition of discrimination