Agenda Signals / Search

Search Agenda Signals

Search for subjects across all topics.

Frames sexual assault through emotionally charged language that emphasizes shock over systemic analysis

0 +
-5

Portrays crime, particularly sexual violence, as a salient issue in high-profile athletes, amplifying perceived prevalence without systemic context.

0 +
-7

Undermines the significance of Nazi-associated symbols in public life

0 +
-6

Portrays crime as a serious and distressing public threat

0 +
-6

Framing centers anti-LGBTQ+ motivation as central to the crime

0 +
+6

Overemphasizes criminal behavior among unhoused individuals, amplifying fear and reinforcing stereotypes.

0 +
-8

Frames violent crime as ongoing and disruptive, with emphasis on public danger

0 +
-6

Portrays crime as random, terrifying, and driven by individual madness

0 +
-9

Portrays criminal behavior as deeply disturbing and perverse

0 +
-8

Portrays crime as rampant and morally justified in response

0 +
-7

Frames the incident as a serious violent crime, amplifying perceived threat

0 +
-5

Portrays the criminal exploitation of minors through alcohol and grooming as a severe, deliberate abuse of power.

0 +
-7

Presents serial sexual predation as a dangerous, organized, and technologically enabled criminal enterprise

0 +
-8

Frames the crime as exceptionally dangerous and urgent, amplifying threat perception

0 +
-6

Portrays crime as racially charged and socially destabilizing

0 +
-8

Amplifies crime as justification for federal intervention without independent verification

0 +
+4

Strongly frames crime as pervasive, organized, and tied to immigration and financial systems

0 +
-9

Portrays criminal behavior as exceptionally predatory and damaging to society

0 +
-8

Frames serial sexual predation as a severe, organized, and ongoing threat requiring exposure.

0 +
-7

Minimizes Wembanyama's physical aggression as justified retaliation rather than misconduct

0 +
-5

Depicts Lee McDonnell as an almost mythic criminal figure, reinforcing negative stereotypes about Irish criminals

0 +
-6

Sensationalizes criminal behavior and promotes a narrative of uncontrollable violence

0 +
-8

Associates Reform UK’s candidate with a convicted criminal, emphasizing criminality and moral unfitness.

0 +
-7

Frames the incident as a severe criminal act requiring maximum legal consequences

0 +
-6

Emphasizes extreme brutality and moral deviance in the crime scene description

0 +
-6

Frames serious sexual violence allegations as administrative exclusion issue, downplaying gravity

0 +
-7

Frames the act as deranged vandalism rather than political protest, emphasizing criminality and menace

0 +
-7

Frames violent crime as intrinsically linked to migrant status, amplifying fear and moral panic

0 +
-7

Portrays crime as a severe, violent threat requiring strong state response

0 +
-8

Downplays severity of sexual assault allegations by embedding them in sports logistics narrative

0 +
-5

Frames the crime as exceptionally violent, premeditated, and politically motivated

0 +
-7

Crime is portrayed as an extreme and immediate physical threat to public safety

0 +
-9

Portrays crime as chaotic and deeply disturbing, especially when involving children

0 +
-8

Frames crime as sudden, violent, and family-linked without context

0 +
-8

Portrays the crime as exceptionally heinous and morally repugnant through prosecutorial language

0 +
-8

Minimizes the seriousness of violent crime by questioning weapon lethality and self-defense claims

0 +
-3

Portrays crime as a severe, morally reprehensible act driven by group violence and individual leadership

0 +
-8

Portrays criminal behavior during protests as serious and costly

0 +
-6

Portrays crime as a severe, morally condemned act driven by individual culpability

0 +
-8

Portrays crime, particularly hit-and-run and repeat offenses, as deeply reckless and preventable.

0 +
-8

Frames the crime as resulting from environmental permissiveness rather than individual agency

0 +
-7

Frames violent crime as disruptive to public safety and community events

0 +
-4

Frames violent crime as disruptive and traumatic, particularly in a peaceful community setting

0 +
-6

Frames the crime as particularly heinous through selective descriptive emphasis

0 +
-6

Frames the crime as particularly heinous through emotionally loaded imagery

0 +
-6

Sensationalises criminality by focusing on notoriety, escape, and unsolved violence without structural or societal context

0 +
-6

Portrays crime as driven by ideological rage and personal instability

0 +
-8

Strongly frames crime and public disorder as severe and escalating threat

0 +
-8

Frames crime as being driven primarily by illegal immigration and sanctuary policies, ignoring broader socioeconomic or systemic factors

0 +
-8

Normalizes participation in the January 6 Capitol attack by reframing perpetrators as 'victims'

0 +
-8

Frames crime as morally unjustifiable and linked to victimhood

0 +
-6

Portrays violent crime as chaotic and racially charged, especially in Northern Ireland

0 +
-6

Portrays crime as racially motivated without evidence

0 +
-8

Frames mass shooting as senseless and morally reprehensible

0 +
-7

Amplifies moral panic around sexual crime by using dehumanizing labels and emotional appeals

0 +
-8

Frames the incident as part of a dramatic, transnational criminal threat rather than a traffic fatality under investigation

0 +
-9

Portrays crime as rampant and heartless, reinforcing a narrative of lawlessness

0 +
-7

Portrays crime as a serious and immediate threat to public safety

0 +
-8

Frames crime as primarily driven by migrant perpetrators and border vulnerabilities

0 +
-7

Frames violent crime as shocking and traumatic, particularly when targeting children

0 +
-7

Portrays youth violence as a serious moral and social threat requiring strong punishment

0 +
-7

Framing emphasizes violent confrontation and weapon possession

0 +
-4

Elevates fraud as a major crime, equating false claims with exploitation of trauma

0 +
+6

Associates the stabbing with broader social unrest and fear

0 +
-5

Portrays crime as widespread and deeply entrenched in South African society

0 +
-8

Links immigration to crime through suggestive association

0 +
-6

Frames violent crime as random, extreme, and directed at the most vulnerable

0 +
-9

Frames crime as a catalyst for broader societal breakdown

0 +
-6

Emphasizes brutality and moral depravity of the crime to evoke emotional condemnation

0 +
-8

Portraying traffic light compliance as under threat due to widespread disregard and lack of enforcement

0 +
-7

Crime context framed with ongoing severity but not sensationalized

0 +
-4

Portrays crime as morally outrageous and traumatizing, especially when targeting children

0 +
-9

Public safety portrayed as under immediate threat

0 +
-7

Framed as a societal crisis escalating racial tensions

0 +
-8

Portrays crime as spiraling and requiring urgent political intervention

0 +
-7

The crime is framed as an extreme, exceptional crisis rather than a criminal incident under investigation

0 +
-9

Frames the murder as a serious, premeditated act endangering public safety

0 +
-6

Portrays the public as under immediate threat from violent crime and online incitement

0 +
-5

Frames violent crime as having severe moral and personal consequences

0 +
-4

Portrays PED use as rule-breaking and ethically questionable

0 +
-6

Sensationalizes isolated crime incident as emblematic of urban decay

0 +
-6

Emphasises the threat of gang violence linked to illicit tobacco, amplifying fear and urgency

0 +
-7

Iranian actions framed as criminal and destructive

0 +
-6

Frames fan-related incidents as criminal behavior requiring law enforcement intervention, emphasizing arrests and violence.

0 +
-7

portrays crime as a crisis requiring urgent accountability

0 +
-7

Frames crime, especially metal theft, as rampant and uncontrolled due to systemic failures

0 +
-7

The public is portrayed as living in fear, with communities depicted as vulnerable and under threat

0 +
-6

framing the crime as a contained personal tragedy rather than a symptom of broader social or systemic issues

0 +
-5

framing crime as an isolated personal tragedy rather than a societal harm, centering perpetrator's family and excluding victim and community perspectives

0 +
-6

Portrays crime as chaotic and threatening public order

0 +
-7

White individuals are framed as vulnerable to sudden violence in integrated public spaces

0 +
-5

Crime is framed as a hostile act driven by racial tension

0 +
-7

Frames use of banned drugs in recovery as a form of rule evasion and competitive cheating

0 +
-5

The stabbing is framed as a community-shaking crisis, not an isolated incident

0 +
-7

The community is portrayed as deeply unsafe following a school-related stabbing

0 +
-6

crime incident framed as a community crisis requiring accountability

0 +
-7

Portrays criminal behavior as predatory and calculated, emphasizing victim vulnerability

0 +
-8

Crime is portrayed as racially destabilizing and threatening public order

0 +
-6

Crime is being framed as a serious threat to public safety

0 +
-8

Amplifies fear of violent crime linked to migrants, using sensationalist descriptors

0 +
-7