Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results)
Irish Government portrayed as responding effectively to protect citizens and pursue accountability
Government regulatory actions framed as illegitimate when used to benefit political allies
Cuban government portrayed as illegitimate and hereditary
framed as misallocating resources due to ideological bias
Federal prosecution is portrayed as credible and morally authoritative
School administration portrayed as potentially negligent or untrustworthy in duty of care
Government institutions framed as despotic and unaccountable
U.S. government portrayed as failing to protect citizens abroad
Judicial officials portrayed as corrupt or compromising justice
New Zealand Government portrayed as untrustworthy and losing legitimacy
US Government portrayed as untrustworthy and corrupt
UK state institutions framed as adversaries to climate and Palestine solidarity activists
Portraying UK government as responsive and effective in crisis management
portrayed as engaging in dishonest regulatory manipulation
Suggesting potential fiscal recklessness by leadership
Framing government fiscal management as internally conflicted and potentially irresponsible
Government law enforcement and prosecution efforts framed as undermined by procedural failures
Government portrayed as failing to protect Jewish citizens
Government framed as adversarial toward critical media figures
government portrayed as adversarial toward workers
ICE leadership appointment framed as ethically questionable
Government legitimacy questioned due to delayed victim compensation
US Government and network leadership implied to be corrupt due to political influence
The US government is portrayed as dishonest and evasive in its actions
Government is framed as untrustworthy for failing to act on integration and prevent violence
U.S. government actions framed as potentially violating legal mandates
framed as complicit in systemic failures
Portrays the state's execution machinery as functioning efficiently and consistently under political leadership
state positioned as enforcer of justice against criminal elements
Charges dropped against activists in Chicago immigration crackdown amid grand jury misconduct claims
US Government portrayed as adversarial toward protesters and civil liberties
city government is portrayed as reckless and corrupt in its hiring and funding decisions
Implies political interference in health institutions for electoral gain
Colorado’s Democratic governor commutes ex-election clerk Tina Peters’ sentence after Trump pressure
Framed as corrupt bargain between governor and president
Government is portrayed as untrustworthy due to long-term neglect of Cornwall
US national security portrayed as endangered by insider betrayal
CBS's actions framed as corrupt or ethically compromised due to settlement with Trump
Government response implied as inadequate or delayed
Framing the US government as corrupt and engaged in a cover-up
Immigration enforcement system portrayed as corrupt and profit-driven
Federal government funding decisions are framed as irresponsible and lacking accountability
Moderate framing of government effectiveness as failing due to internal rifts
Framed as struggling to resolve labor disputes despite past interventions
Portrays state government as corrupt and self-dealing
UK government defence policy portrayed as failing and unprepared
US government portrayed as decisively effective in crisis response
Government officials portrayed as potentially corrupt or improperly influencing justice
portrayed as compromised by courthouse misconduct
Government figures are implied to have enabled violence through rhetoric that dehumanizes Muslims
Institutional failure in judicial oversight
Local governance framed as ineffective in protecting citizens
Government immigration enforcement is portrayed as morally questionable and politically motivated
Coalition's 'death tax' framing implies government is untrustworthy and using scare tactics
U.S. government's pursuit of Witt framed as legitimate and justified
UK government's EU reset policy framed as inadequate
portrayed as underperforming and inefficient
The U.S. government is portrayed as finally taking effective and decisive action against a long-standing enemy
US Government portrayed as untrustworthy in crisis response
Local government action legitimised through moral activism
Federal push to expand death penalty framed as harmful escalation
Government vetting processes framed as compromised due to royal influence
Government portrayed as complicit or untrustworthy in royal appointments
government policy framed as politically motivated rather than substantive
Government portrayed as failing in oversight by allowing an unevaluated royal appointment
portrayed as lacking transparency and accountability in royal appointments
implied adversary by referencing 'politics of another era' that seek to block Canadian resource development
State execution apparatus framed as potentially untrustworthy due to prior testimony issues
Labor's reforms framed as bold and worthwhile despite controversy
National security situation framed as urgent crisis requiring immediate rearmament
Political system framed in crisis due to judicial intervention in party leadership
US government is implicitly framed as an adversary by omission in a comparative context
The government is framed as implementing a policy based on questionable rationale involving 'loopholes' and 'slipping into the shadows'
The government is framed as making a reckless, poorly considered decision that harms ordinary Australians
US-Israel actions implicitly questioned due to omission of regional context
casts doubt on the government's competence and transparency in administering executions
Local government leadership is portrayed as corrupt or negligent for weakening law enforcement
Framed as bypassing legitimate process and lacking public mandate
US Government framed as adversarial toward Gold Star families by withholding funds
Government institutions portrayed as corrupted by political appointment and procedural bypass
US Government is portrayed as firm and effective in border enforcement
Portraying the UK government as failing in oversight and institutional accountability
Government institutions are vulnerable to corruption
UK Government's decision-making portrayed as lacking legitimacy due to royal interference
The UK government is framed as failing to provide effective national strategy or funding for coastal adaptation
Government action is framed as secretive and politically motivated rather than transparent or policy-driven
Government institutions implicitly questioned due to court clerk misconduct
State government agencies portrayed as untrustworthy due to exaggeration and lack of accountability
Portrays state authorities as untrustworthy due to procedural failures and prior false testimony
School governance framed as undermined by individual defiance
Framed as lacking transparency and accountability in budget management
Independent MLA treated as less legitimate due to lack of party affiliation
portrayed as failing due to lack of oversight and outdated norms
State authorities are framed as adversarial to due process and humanitarian concerns
framed as unstable due to multiple high-level resignations and internal conflict
Framed as failing due to poor decision-making and economic mismanagement
US Government portrayed as corrupt and engaging in vindictive prosecution
portrayed as proactive and strategically ambitious in post-Brexit diplomacy
Political institutions, including foreign ones, are framed as targets of exclusion and attack
US Government portrayed as withholding or selectively releasing information
US Government portrayed as engaging in corrupt political manipulation
Foreign jurisdictions like the US are framed as competitive adversaries in attracting talent and capital