Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (66 results) — filtered
Energy policy is framed as economically beneficial but environmentally contested
Data center expansion is framed as environmentally harmful and disruptive
Progressive green energy policy framed as economically destructive
Environmentally motivated projects are framed as illegitimate and poorly executed
Transit-oriented development framed as environmentally beneficial through infrastructure alignment
Current water governance is framed as lacking legitimacy due to absence of long-term planning and community consultation
Current water and agricultural policies are framed as failing to adapt to climate realities
Energy policy is framed as actively harmful to climate stability
Carbon border adjustment mechanism framed as compounding harm to Ukrainian industry
Framing the sand mining proposal as potentially harmful to marine ecosystems and kaimoana resources
Framing the environment as under threat from development
Data centre growth framed as an escalating crisis for national energy stability
Ireland's energy system portrayed as under threat from data centre expansion
Nuclear energy framed as potentially harmful due to cost overruns and delays
Energy policy framed as requiring innovation beyond current renewables
Energy policy framed as environmentally compromised, relying on fossil fuels
Framing LNG import facility as potentially illegitimate due to cost and strategic concerns
Framing LNG import facility as a potentially ineffective or suboptimal solution
Framed as a threat to environmental stability and animal welfare
Climate adaptation is framed as an urgent crisis requiring immediate systemic overhaul
LNG importation is framed as beneficial for energy security and affordability
Energy policy is framed as becoming more effective through government intervention
Framing Labour’s clean energy transition as economically damaging and ineffective
LNG import facility is framed as essential and positive for energy security
portrays government's LNG modelling as flawed due to ignored geopolitical risks
portrays LNG terminal as essential for economic stability during dry years
Energy Policy framed as environmentally harmful
portraying federal energy policy as ineffective and promise-driven
Russia's energy infrastructure framed as vulnerable and under sustained attack, causing economic harm
Data centre energy systems are framed as posing environmental and public health risks
Fossil fuel dependence is framed as harmful and central to the climate crisis
Environment portrayed as under threat from development
Wildlife-human conflict is framed as an escalating crisis requiring urgent investment
Parks and wildlife management are underfunded and reactive rather than proactive
Framing agricultural land and climate stability as under threat from data infrastructure
Domestic energy transition framed as a positive, necessary evolution
Decarbonisation via electric arc furnace is framed as a positive, vital environmental transition
Energy policy is portrayed as exacerbating water scarcity and environmental degradation
Chemically intensive agriculture and pesticide use framed as harmful to human health and the environment
Implication that current climate policies are failing to prevent extreme warming events
Waste-to-energy policy portrayed as having potentially far-reaching harmful consequences
Energy policy framed as posing health and environmental risks to communities
Framed as failing to manage grid capacity and emissions, risking massive fines and environmental degradation
Implies environmental regulations are being disregarded
Highlights failure in environmental oversight processes
federal energy regulations framed as harmful to Alberta and other provinces
Policy shifts are framed as harmful to environmental monitoring
Prior nuclear policy is framed as broken and delayed, creating a crisis narrative to justify new approach
Nuclear energy infrastructure framed in a state of crisis
Nuclear energy infrastructure portrayed as vulnerable and weaponized
Nuclear infrastructure near Chornobyl framed as threatened, despite stable radiation levels
Framing fossil fuel expansion as adversarial to environmental and Indigenous interests
Framing green energy transition as beneficial and central to national and global climate responsibility
Federal energy and climate policies are framed as harmful to Alberta’s economy and interests
Energy policy is framed as failing to manage the impact of data centers on local power systems
Shift toward renewable energy and electric vehicles framed as a positive long-term outcome of the crisis
Coal-based energy policy is framed as environmentally harmful
Energy policy is portrayed as economically irrational and failing
Government environmental policy is framed as failing to protect biodiversity due to conflicting incentives
AI data centres are framed as straining energy resources and posing environmental risk
Peat extraction and related land policies are framed as environmentally destructive
Europe’s green transition policy is failing due to slow battery production rollout
Energy Policy is framed as harmful due to instability and fossil fuel prioritization
Energy system portrayed as under threat from data centre demand
Framing the environment as under severe threat from development
Russian energy infrastructure framed as damaged and strategically weakened