Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results) — filtered
Clear topic filterframed as a contentious election under scrutiny
framed as a moment of political crisis or instability
The electoral process is framed as being under strain from unconventional, high-profile candidates lacking experience
The electoral process is subtly undermined by focusing on sensationalism over policy
Elections framed as high-stakes and vulnerable to long-term structural threats
Framed as influenced by undue presidential pressure
framed as a source of harm due to miscalculation
undermining the legitimacy of leadership succession procedures
Elections Alberta is portrayed as actively responding and competent in managing a serious breach
Framed as potentially illegitimate due to media exclusion claims
Election promises framed as potentially unreliable if later reversed
Electoral polling process framed as untrustworthy due to lack of transparency
Election prospects framed as unstable or concerning
Framing party switching as destabilizing to political stability
Eurovision framed as a political crisis rather than a stable cultural event
Portrays the electoral process as under unjustified attack and needing defense
Elections framed as high-stakes and competitive, with urgency around flipping the seat
Framed as ineffective and dominated by ego, scandal, and celebrity rather than public service
Portrays NYC elections as descending into chaos and spectacle
Suggests election system changes may undermine ballot legitimacy
framed as resembling entertainment rather than a serious democratic process
Election process framed as driven by spectacle over substance
implying the current government lacks democratic durability despite recent mandate
Elections framed as being in a state of ongoing partisan crisis due to redistricting battles
framed as having questionable legitimacy due to poor electoral performance
Framed as a nation in political crisis and institutional breakdown
Political situation framed as chaotic and unstable
Political process framed as driven by backroom drama and speculation rather than policy or public mandate
Georgia elections framed as trustworthy under Raffensperger’s administration
Midterm elections framed as high-risk event driven by economic discontent
Elections framed as high-stakes, urgent, and in crisis
Texas Senate race framed as a high-stakes, long-shot Democratic effort in a conservative state
Leadership legitimacy questioned due to internal dissent
Democratic primary outcome framed as illegitimate due to racial dynamics
undermines legitimacy of alternative leadership through unrepresentative polling
Elections portrayed as vulnerable to manipulation and partisan interference
Political engagement framed as driven by emotional distress rather than rational participation
portrayed as in a state of emergency due to redistricting threats
Eurovision framed as a political crisis rather than a cultural event
Prime minister's legitimacy to lead into next election questioned through institutional statements
Framed as a destabilising crisis following an election, undermining confidence in new government
Eurovision event framed as politically destabilized by protest
Voting integrity in Eurovision framed as compromised, suggesting manipulation
framed as undermined by partisan redistricting
Election integrity upheld by Raffensperger framed as legitimate, contrasting with Trump’s false claims
Elections framed as in crisis due to two-party system
Election process framed as chaotic, deceptive, and under threat of manipulation
framed as occurring in a context of heightened political tension
portraying the electoral process as under threat from Democratic manipulation
Primary challengers are implicitly framed as less legitimate by being marginalized and described as calling for change without substantive platform details
framed as a harmful disaster rather than a setback
election process framed as undemocratic and performative
Election process in Louisiana framed as less legitimate due to narrowing of voter access
undermines the legitimacy of recent election outcomes by implying they were flawed or unsustainable
Framed as a politically volatile moment driven by electoral vulnerability
Local election results framed as damaging and destabilising
Election process framed as orderly and rule-bound
Election portrayed as unstable and in crisis due to Democratic disunity and vote fragmentation
framed as a moment of political crisis and democratic vulnerability
The electoral process is framed as compromised by foreign interference
election period framed as time of political urgency and instability
Election results and aftermath framed as a national political crisis
undermining the legitimacy of current leadership mandate through crisis framing
government's campaign promises framed as broken or hypocritical
Framed as politically contested, with democratic processes challenged
election integrity is being challenged through allegations of ballot inconsistencies
framed as having harmful consequences for governance and stability
The electoral oversight process is framed as having been applied illegitimately in this case
election results framed as a rejection of leadership, undermining legitimacy
Nomination process framed as potentially illegitimate
Framed as potentially illegitimate due to non-transparent awarding of major contracts
countering narrative of electoral instability or bloc voting as a threat
electoral losses framed as systemic collapse
undermines legitimacy of recent election mandate
The legitimacy of Labour's recent electoral mandate is implicitly questioned
Frames recent election results as harmful to government stability
framing recent election outcomes as damaging to leadership legitimacy
portrayed as undermining the legitimacy of current leadership
electoral outcome portrayed as a damaging mauling
Suggests weakening legitimacy of current leadership following electoral defeat
Elections Alberta is portrayed as overwhelmed but responding competently to a serious data breach
Highlights procedural legitimacy of Labour’s leadership challenge rules as a strategic advantage
Election process portrayed as under threat from fraud and state repression
Electoral integrity questioned by insinuation of a 'Republican plant'
Elections framed as unstable due to unusual dynamics and strategic risks
Election process framed as unstable and marked by strategic manipulation
Elections portrayed as being in crisis due to fraud and mismanagement
electoral system portrayed as in crisis due to Democratic actions
Electoral succession process framed as informal and undermined by personal spectacle
The electoral process is portrayed as under threat from voter suppression
Elections are framed as illegitimate due to voter dilution and elite manipulation
Existing electoral dynamics are subtly questioned as insufficient for Māori representation
Upcoming election framed as a moment of political crisis and institutional vulnerability
Undermines the legitimacy of Starmer's mandate by highlighting lack of electoral mandate for any successor
The mayoral election is framed as an urgent cultural rescue mission rather than a democratic process
Electoral outcomes are shifting due to changing voter priorities, suggesting a political transition beyond crisis but with underlying instability
Framed as increasingly susceptible to partisan manipulation
Electoral outcomes are framed with implied distrust in official narratives due to omission of verifiable results
Elections framed as illegitimately manipulated by Democrats when outcomes are unfavorable
Election process framed as undermined by state court despite voter approval