Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (100 results)
candidate nomination process portrayed as opaque and contested
Colorado’s Democratic governor commutes ex-election clerk Tina Peters’ sentence after Trump pressure
Election systems portrayed as under threat due to commutation
Framed as potentially undemocratic due to internal party disputes
Electoral process framed as undermined by absentee leadership
Framing amplifies the personal conflict as a high-stakes crisis affecting political stability and public trust
Framed as descending into chaos and spectacle rather than serious governance
Budget controversy framed as triggering significant political crisis and backlash
Portrays Trump’s election claims as fundamentally illegitimate
Electoral landscape framed as in crisis and undergoing dramatic realignment
Framed as under existential threat from executive overreach
The removal of Viktor Orban is framed as resolving a political obstacle, creating urgency for progress on EU accession
The election is framed with slight urgency and fragility due to low turnout and narrow margins
Political figures aligned with Trump portrayed as cooperative allies in honoring heroism
The upcoming election is framed as unstable and highly competitive
questions about legitimacy of conduct in legislative process
Political situation framed as escalating crisis
Political transition framed as tense and conflict-ridden rather than orderly
Electoral process portrayed as unreliable due to uncounted votes and errors
framed as politically strategic rather than democratically substantive
framed as procedurally flawed and potentially illegitimate
Democratic candidate endorsements are framed as ethically compromised and lacking credibility
electoral outcome framed as untrustworthy due to manipulation
electoral system portrayed as broken and unrepresentative
Elections framed as unstable or in crisis due to celebrity disruption
Platner's candidacy is framed as illegitimate due to character flaws rather than policy disagreements
Framed as adversarial within the GOP, with Trump undermining party unity for personal revenge
Election process portrayed as vulnerable to illegitimate interference
framed as an opportunity for positive systemic reform
Electoral process framed as unserious and manipulated
Framing media coverage as being in crisis due to imbalance
Election process framed as unstable and high-risk due to candidate controversies
Suggests election security is being endangered by unfounded federal actions
Frames election processes as under illegitimate threat from federal overreach
Election integrity portrayed as being in crisis due to alleged manipulation
Electoral process framed as under threat from fraud allegations
Framed as politically unstable or at risk due to fiscal controversies
Electoral process framed as vulnerable to disruption by unaccountable absences
leadership race framed as high-stakes turning point
Election system framed as under threat from conspiracy actors
framed as an election in crisis due to a candidate's legal and political troubles
undermines the legitimacy of campaign promises being fulfilled
Undermines trust in election integrity by centering the victimhood narrative of election deniers
Election process framed as chaotic and urgency-driven rather than orderly
Political system and voter trust portrayed as collapsed and absurd
Framed as occurring amid systemic political crisis
Alvarado’s candidacy is framed as legitimate primarily due to Trump’s endorsement, not policy or record
Election framed as high-stakes and conflict-driven
public framed as excluded from transparent decision-making on a major policy deal
primary elections framed as a high-stakes crisis of loyalty and party control
framing the election as a crisis-driven upheaval against establishment leadership
Vaccine policy is framed as a politically volatile issue with electoral consequences
Municipal elections framed as stable but potentially fragile equilibrium
City leadership portrayed as responsive and effective in crisis management
Electoral process framed as under threat from external financial manipulation
The electoral process is framed as being under urgent threat from AI-driven inauthenticity
electoral process framed as descending into spectacle and instability
Election runoff framed as lacking broad popular legitimacy
Elections framed as occurring within a context of ongoing political crisis
Electoral integrity portrayed as threatened by fraudulent candidacies
portrayed as occurring under unusual and somber circumstances
elections framed as hostile threats to leaders
Election process framed as potentially unstable due to voter confusion
Framed as descending into crisis and upheaval
Electoral process framed as potentially corrupt or manipulated
Framed as adversarial to democratic institutions rather than protective of them
Elections portrayed as under threat from baseless investigations that undermine public confidence
The legitimacy of the byelection as a local democratic event is undermined by framing it primarily as a vehicle for personal political advancement
The electoral process in Makerfield is implicitly framed as unstable or under threat due to hyper-partisan national intervention
The byelection is framed as a high-stakes national political crisis rather than a routine local contest
undermining institutional legitimacy by bypassing formal processes in favor of social media announcements
Elections framed as being in crisis due to partisan redistricting battles
election integrity portrayed as under threat from flawed administrative processes
Elections portrayed as under threat from non-citizen voting
The electoral process is portrayed as being undermined and delegitimized
Electoral system and political process framed as illegitimate and rigged
Political candidacy is framed as driven by media fame rather than democratic legitimacy
The electoral process is subtly framed as being influenced more by elite endorsements than voter choice, questioning legitimacy
Elections framed as susceptible to indirect manipulation through state legislative composition
The legitimacy of Starmer's current leadership mandate is questioned through calls for early departure
Eurovision voting system framed as potentially corrupted to benefit Israel
framed as volatile and unstable due to high initial undecided levels
2028 election framed as an early, high-stakes contest with implied urgency
framed as vulnerable to partisan manipulation
Election framed as volatile due to independent spoiler dynamics
incumbent Republicans framed as excluded or under threat due to party disunity
Voter fraud allegations framed as politically inflated, not systemic
Elections framed as being under threat from unreliable AI-generated information
Election integrity efforts framed as legitimate and necessary
Burnham's challenge framed as a legitimate alternative vision for Labour
Constituents framed as marginally involved in decision-making
No strong framing of elections or democratic processes as effective or failing in climate response
Framed as unserious and mythologized, undermining electoral legitimacy
Framing election integrity as under threat from insider actions
Electoral integrity portrayed as threatened by ministerial conduct
Election process framed as potentially illegitimate due to undisclosed AI use
The electoral moment is framed as unstable and marked by voter unrest
By-election framed as an illegitimate crisis driven by elite power struggles
The political environment is framed as unstable and chaotic, dominated by rumours and internal divisions rather than orderly governance.
Primary process framed as influenced by outside spending and loyalty enforcement
Framed as undermined by external pressure and loyalty tests