Agenda Signals / Search

Search Agenda Signals

Search for subjects across all topics.

Promotes an idealized image of traditional family unity and intergenerational connection within the royal context.

0 +
+7

Portrays royal family dynamics as fractured and exclusionary

0 +
-5

Portrays familial forgiveness as morally elevated and central to justice

0 +
+8

Frames current visa delays as harmful to family reunification and personal dignity

0 +
-6

Highlights parental grief and perceived betrayal to amplify moral failure

0 +
-6

Frames family estrangement as dramatic and publicly performative rather than private or complex

0 +
-6

Highlights maternal support as critical to justice and healing in trauma cases

0 +
+8

Elevates family distress as a central moral justification for expanded state intervention

0 +
+7

Portrays family relationships as dysfunctional and emotionally damaging

0 +
-8

Subtly undermines the stability and prestige of Gino's family life through focus on financial strain and failed investments

0 +
-4

Frames the grieving father’s statement as racially exclusionary and rooted in white supremacy

0 +
-7

Frames family health matter as a mitigating context for absence, potentially softening public perception of misconduct

0 +
+5

Humanizes the impact of violence through a grieving mother’s statement, evoking emotional resonance

0 +
+7

Implies familial deviance by associating three brothers with separate violent acts

0 +
-7

Portrays family dynamics as dysfunctional and isolating, reinforcing narrative of parental unfitness

0 +
-7

Depicts family structure as unstable and neglectful

0 +
-7

Framing families of the missing as participants in violent protest rather than victims seeking justice

0 +
-6

Elevates the sanctity and tragedy of the family unit, emphasizing victimhood and emotional devastation

0 +
+7

Romanticizes the presence of soldiers’ families at military events as emotionally uplifting and humanizing

0 +
+6

Depicts family units as collateral damage in celebrity moral failings

0 +
-7

Presents family members as authoritative moral voices on public figures' well-being

0 +
+7

Frames family settings as sites of hidden danger and moral failure

0 +
-7

Highlights the devastating impact of violent crime on family structure and emotional well-being

0 +
-6

Portrayal of family dysfunction and manipulation in intergenerational communication

0 +
-5

Family unit portrayed as fractured and dysfunctional

0 +
-7

Frames family under strain due to media and legal scrutiny

0 +
-3

Elevates the grieving family’s narrative as morally authoritative

0 +
+7

Family relationships portrayed as adversarial rather than private or neutral

0 +
-7

The family unit is portrayed as shattered by extreme violence and intrafamilial betrayal

0 +
-8

Nick Reiner is framed as being excluded by his family, particularly through financial denial

0 +
-4

Nick Reiner framed as excluded by his own family from financial and emotional support during legal crisis

0 +
-7

Portraying the family unit as dysfunctional and fractured

0 +
-6

Portrays the family unit as a site of hidden violence and betrayal, undermining narratives of domestic safety

0 +
-6

Portrays the family as innocent victims deserving of sympathy and protection

0 +
+9

Portrays the family unit as victimized by institutional intrusion

0 +
+7

Frames family environment as abusive and dysfunctional

0 +
-5

Highlights parental responsibility in youth supervision and curfew compliance

0 +
+4

Portrays family dynamics as adversarial and conflict-driven in a high-conflict custody dispute

0 +
-4

Frames immigration enforcement as causing severe and ongoing family trauma and separation

0 +
-9

Elevates family grief as central to the moral weight of the crime

0 +
+7

Frames families as traumatized and enduring long-term suffering due to violent crime

0 +
-7

Frames gender care interventions as causing significant family disruption and emotional distress

0 +
-5

Portraying family carers as exploited and abandoned by the state

0 +
-8

Portrays the family as victims seeking justice and rehabilitation

0 +
+7

Marginalizes family perspective and personal history, limiting empathetic framing of the deceased

0 +
-3

Portrays the Anthony family as profiteering from a murder conviction, framing them negatively through moral outrage and implication of misuse of funds.

0 +
-8

Frames non-traditional families as controversial by presenting extreme criticism without expert rebuttal, implying societal unease.

0 +
-7

Elevates family as a source of emotional strength and personal meaning in athletic achievement

0 +
+7

Portrays familial relationships as sources of pressure and betrayal rather than support

0 +
-5

Highlights the abuse of parental trust and domestic setting in the commission of the crime

0 +
-6

Frames familial relationships as strained and dysfunctional, emphasizing conflict over support

0 +
-6

Positively associates family and fatherhood with responsible life decisions and personal integrity

0 +
+5

Frames the potential separation of a nuclear family as a humanitarian crisis caused by bureaucratic indifference

0 +
-7

Familial loyalty is portrayed as heroic and morally righteous in public defense

0 +
+7

Portrays family bonds as secondary to criminal risk in emotionally charged context

0 +
-7

Portrays family travel as being unfairly burdened by corporate policy

0 +
-5

Elevates family voice as moral authority seeking justice

0 +
+8

Elevates the family's grief as central to the narrative, humanizing the impact of violence

0 +
+6

Portrays family life as severely undermined by systemic housing failure

0 +
-8

Elevates familial loyalty as a moral imperative in public disputes

0 +
+5

Portrays political differences as a destructive force in family relationships

0 +
-6

Frames restrictions on family reunification as cruel and damaging to refugee families

0 +
-8

Framing emphasizes benefit to working families, portraying them as deserving recipients of public support

0 +
+4

Implies traditional disciplinary practices within families may be harmful and in need of legal intervention

0 +
-5

Frames family relationships as defined by secrecy, denial, and emotional harm

0 +
-5

Subtly frames traditional parental discipline practices as harmful and in need of legal constraint.

0 +
-4

Frames the family unit as a site of hidden tension and potential violence

0 +
-5

Frames the family unit as a site of latent violence and dysfunction in this context

0 +
-5

Portrays family disputes as drivers of community violence and trauma

0 +
-6

Portrays extended family as concerned, credible, and morally central

0 +
+7

Portrays family relationships as dysfunctional and morally deviant

0 +
-8

Highlights family dignity and honor as central to the protest motivation, framing familial protection as a legitimate driver of resistance.

0 +
+7

Elevates the Wright family’s personal suffering as a symbol of resilience amid systemic injustice

0 +
+9

Implies breakdown of family supervision and caregiving in Aboriginal communities

0 +
-5

Portrays family loyalty and grief as morally compelling

0 +
+8

Portrays familial loyalty and emotional suffering as paramount, potentially overshadowing justice concerns

0 +
+7

Frames family grief as the central moral anchor of the story, positioning familial bonds as sacred and violated.

0 +
-8

Portrays family relationships as sites of extreme violence and betrayal

0 +
-6

Frames family breakdown through conflict and suspicion, undermining stability

0 +
-5

Uses sentimental portrayal of the officer’s family and childhood to amplify emotional impact.

0 +
+7

Frames the family as a site of prolonged, systemic abuse and betrayal of trust

0 +
-7

Elevates the family's emotional experience as central to the legitimacy of the inquiry

0 +
+9

Frames family members as protectors of dignity in death

0 +
+3

Portrays the national effort against family and sexual violence as being undermined by workforce cuts

0 +
-7

Portrays family dynamics as fractured and defined by estrangement

0 +
-7