Agenda Signals / Search

Search Agenda Signals

Search for subjects across all topics.

Evokes sympathy by highlighting the emotional impact on a child during a traumatic event

0 +
+6

Frames children, especially Traveller children, as inherently vicious and without innocence

0 +
-7

Frames children as vulnerable victims of unregulated tech, with their development and safety under systemic threat

0 +
-6

Positions children as vulnerable and passive victims of technological forces beyond their control

0 +
-4

Frames children as vulnerable and passive recipients of harmful online influences

0 +
-7

Frames children as passive victims of pervasive online harm requiring extreme intervention

0 +
-7

Portrays children with disabilities as deserving of equitable support and frames denial of aids as harmful to their educational participation.

0 +
+7

Frames children as victims of parental neglect in a sensationalized context

0 +
-6

Portraying children as vulnerable to online influences and risky behavior

0 +
-4

Highlights children as primary victims to amplify humanitarian impact

0 +
+7

Highlights children’s trauma to amplify emotional impact of the violence

0 +
-6

Frames children as pure victims of senseless violence, emphasizing innocence and vulnerability

0 +
+9

Emphasises the rights and protection of children, particularly those with high support needs, as a moral imperative.

0 +
+8

Portrays Palestinian children as uniquely vulnerable and victimized by war and blockade

0 +
-9

Highlights children as victims of cross-border violence, evoking moral concern

0 +
-6

Highlights children as victims of cross-border violence

0 +
-8

Frames children as vulnerable and in need of protection from social media, AI, and adult content.

0 +
+8

Portrays children as vulnerable and in need of state protection from digital harms, emphasizing victimhood and risk

0 +
+8

Frames children, particularly the victim, as tragically excluded from safety and future opportunities

0 +
-7

Frames children as victims of adult aggression, emphasizing vulnerability

0 +
-5

Elevates children, especially vulnerable ones, as deserving of protection and empathy

0 +
+8

Positions the child as caught in parental conflict, implicitly vulnerable to emotional harm

0 +
-3

Portrays young people as agents of change in environmental stewardship

0 +
+6

Portrays children as vulnerable victims in a deteriorating moral landscape

0 +
-7

Portrays children as both victims and dangerous actors without balanced context

0 +
-5

Elevates parental concern and trauma as legitimate drivers for systemic reform

0 +
+7

Frames children as vulnerable victims of ideological school policies that compromise their safety and emotional well-being

0 +
+7

Framed as targets of inappropriate political outreach by elected officials

0 +
-5

Portrays children with autism as vulnerable and entitled to equitable access, framing exclusion as a moral failure.

0 +
+8

Portrays foster children as deserving of financial inclusion and long-term economic opportunity

0 +
+8

Highlights emotional harm to children caused by institutional instability

0 +
-7

Portrays the project as mismanaged and failing public expectations

0 +
-6

Mentions child injury only in passing, minimizing civilian harm

0 +
-5

Framing children as potential criminals rather than vulnerable minors

0 +
-3

Frames children as vulnerable and in urgent need of digital protection

0 +
+8

Portrays children as vulnerable and at risk from digital platforms, justifying restrictive measures without exploring alternative safeguards.

0 +
-5

Implies unvaccinated children are at higher risk and contribute to public health danger

0 +
-6

Elevates children as a protected class in need of digital safeguards

0 +
+6

Promotes inclusion and agency of children in policy decisions affecting their lives

0 +
+8

Portrays children as vulnerable to adult violence requiring legal protection

0 +
-6

Associates children with victimhood in cycles of domestic gun violence

0 +
-4

Portrays children as vulnerable victims of adult community conflicts

0 +
-4

Implies children's interests are being neglected due to union priorities

0 +
-5

Portrays children as vulnerable victims of online radicalization and coercion

0 +
-8

Frames children as victims of state violence and systemic abuse in immigration enforcement

0 +
-6

Portrays children as vulnerable to social media harms and in need of protection

0 +
+7

Portrays children as victims in need of state protection and rescue

0 +
+7

Portrays the system as failing vulnerable children due to profit motives

0 +
-8

Raises concern about potential monitoring of minors without resolution

0 +
-3