Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (96 results) — filtered
State economic model framed as reliant on forced labor under strain
Government spending framed as effective in producing rapid results
Public funds portrayed as endangered by systemic benefit fraud
The £369 million renovation is framed as potentially wasted public money due to royal inaction
Public spending on infrastructure is portrayed as poorly managed and inefficient
Frames increased public spending as potentially harmful and destabilizing to the economy
Framing public spending on services as beneficial to workers and society
portrayed as harmful and unsustainable
Public investment in Palace refit framed as potentially wasted
Framing public funding of Black cultural institutions as illegitimate or politically motivated
Public spending is framed with skepticism due to termination of funding over serious allegations
framing taxpayer funding as being misused for immoral and unnecessary purposes
portrayed as illegitimate use of public funds for private misconduct
public spending portrayed as effective and urgently responsive
public spending framed as wasteful and poorly managed
State spending on the facility is portrayed as wasteful and mismanaged
Government infrastructure funding portrayed as in crisis due to outdated tax policy
Public education spending framed as wasteful and ineffective
state spending portrayed as fiscally irresponsible and poorly managed
Frames infrastructure funding as at risk due to proposed tax suspension
Public spending decision framed as financially harmful due to significant overspend
Pension underfunding is framed as harmful to vulnerable retirees despite financial recovery
Framing state spending as contributing to fiscal crisis
Frames pension changes as fiscally irresponsible and harmful to public finances
Funding cuts are portrayed as actively harmful to scientific progress and child survival
Framing past public spending as excessive and poorly managed
Government spending on medicines framed as inadequate and failing
Public spending on steel nationalisation and NHS modernisation is framed as beneficial and necessary investment
EU funds framed as essential for economic recovery and investment
Government infrastructure funding is framed as at risk due to fiscal trade-offs
Framing public spending under Mamdani as wasteful and harmful to future generations
Public funds framed as misused for partisan gain
Public spending priorities are questioned as misaligned with veteran needs
Implied threat to fiscal stability due to political uncertainty, though underreported
Public spending on infrastructure is framed as being hindered by unpredictable legal costs, now being corrected
Framing legal expenditures as wasteful and avoidable
Framed as harmed by unnecessary legal costs
Public spending is portrayed as fundamentally broken and inefficient
Crown funding portrayed as insufficient for state-owned enterprise growth
Public spending on private nursing contracts is framed as harmful to public health system sustainability
Public infrastructure spending portrayed as reactive and wasteful due to preventable disaster
Government spending framed as inherently wasteful; austerity as necessary good
state spending under incumbent framed as ethically questionable
portrayed as fiscally harmful and wasteful
Public spending framed as destructive and unsustainable
Public finances framed as mismanaged due to political instability
Framed as wasteful and misaligned with public priorities
public funds portrayed as misallocated during cost-of-living crisis
Framing increased public spending as necessary and beneficial for public safety
Public spending decisions are framed with suspicion of fiscal irresponsibility
Highlights significant cost overruns and inefficiency in government spending
Project framed as wasteful and financially irresponsible
Government spending on HAP is portrayed as wasteful and harmful to public finances
Government fiscal response framed as inadequate and poorly targeted
Framing underfunding and lack of support as harmful to student attendance and success
Use of public funds framed as potentially corrupt and wasteful
Public Spending is framed as being in crisis due to potential disruption of Highway Trust Fund revenue
Public investment being wasted due to administrative delays
Public spending on infrastructure framed as at risk from gas tax suspension
Implies fiscal policy is in crisis mode, justifying emergency intervention
Implies fiscal strain on infrastructure funding
Public spending decisions failing to keep pace with workforce evolution
Suspension of gas tax framed as fiscally irresponsible
Framed as requiring urgent, crisis-level funding boost despite recent cuts
public funds for symbolic projects questioned as potentially corrupt or unjustified
Framed with skepticism about fiscal accountability
Frames the Pentagon's budget request as harmful and wasteful spending
Public spending is implied as mismanaged due to wasteful litigation
Public spending is framed as wasteful and inefficient
Public spending is implied to be inefficient, with room for reform to fund tax changes
Restricting EU student access to home fees framed as harmful to educational accessibility
Government revenue needs are framed as creating fiscal urgency
Public Spending on infrastructure framed as being in crisis due to revenue shortfall
public spending on the dam framed as potentially wasteful or disproportionate
budgetary approach framed as cautious amid crisis, potentially insufficient
Framed as potentially misused due to RTÉ's unsustainable cost structure
Framing public spending as fiscally risky and potentially unsustainable due to retrospective payouts
Public spending framed as wasteful and misdirected
Welfare spending is portrayed as fiscally unsustainable and crowding out growth-oriented investment
Public spending framed as wasteful and misdirected toward elite interests
Government spending is framed as insufficient and reactive, with limited confidence in its ability to address the cost-of-living crisis
Government investment framed as a necessary corrective to systemic harm
Budget cuts to NDIS social participation funding are framed as harmful to quality of life for disabled children
Government spending framed as potentially fuelling inflation, implying poor economic management
framed as potentially harmful to institutional effectiveness when restricted
Government spending framed as out of control, requiring 'unforgiving' cuts
Government housing policy framed as failing due to short-sighted metrics
Public investment in housing portrayed as poorly utilised and ineffective
Public spending on infrastructure is portrayed as effective and strategically deployed
Government education spending policy framed as failing students
portrays public funds as at risk due to unclear strategy
Investment levels framed as the effective solution to service quality issues
Public spending on AI technology framed as wasteful and misplaced given basic educational failures
Public grocery stores are framed as an effective solution to reduce food prices and increase competition
State ownership framed with slight suspicion due to unequal power dynamics
Public spending framed as wasteful due to cost overrun and lack of competitive bidding