Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics.
Across Topics (100 results) — filtered
Clear topic filterPortrays the Labour Party as internally fractured and losing confidence in leadership
Portrays the Democratic Party as hypocritical and willing to abandon moral principles for political power
Frames GOP and Trump-backed candidates as victims of systemic media bias
Implies collusion between media platforms and Democratic interests
Portrays Democratic actors as upholding legal integrity
Portrays Democratic fundraising as hypocritical and reliant on out-of-state elite interests
Frames the SVP as promoting xenophobic and economically irresponsible policies
Implies party loyalty undermines institutional independence
Associates party with defiance of legal and institutional constraints
Portrays Democratic actors as upholding institutional norms
Portrays Democratic actors as effective in using legal channels to challenge executive actions
Portrays the Democratic Party as unfairly targeted by scrutiny over personal conduct
Portrays Democratic lawmakers as holding Wall Street accountable
Portrays the Democratic Party as ideologically resentful and out of touch with American values of innovation and success.
Frames Republican 'Never Trump' conservatives as morally principled critics of Democratic hypocrisy, giving weight to their accusations of double standards.
Portrays Democratic Party as morally inconsistent by highlighting perceived hypocrisy in downplaying candidate character issues after criticizing Trump.
Associates the party with populist and restrictive policies through critical framing and opposing expert voices
Frames internal party dynamics as chaotic and destabilizing
Portrays left-wing political criticism as irrational hostility toward Musk’s success
Associates the party with alarmist and simplistic policy solutions
Portrays the SVP as exploiting a violent incident to advance its political agenda
Portrays the party as promoting exclusionary policies under the guise of sustainability
Portrays Conservatives as critical and oppositional on defence policy
Frames the SVP as a xenophobic, dominant force promoting exclusionary policies
Depicts the conservative political faction in South Korea as legally and morally compromised.
Portrays the Democratic Party as weak, negligent, and responsible for national insecurity
Implies alignment between Irish political stance and progressive internationalism by omission of conservative viewpoints
Framed as dismissive of humanitarian concerns, using Vatican policy to deflect moral critique
Depicts the party as internally fractured and leadership as unstable, threatening its governing legitimacy.
Portrays the Labour Party as internally divided and unfit to govern on national security
Depicts the Democratic Party as morally culpable for violent crime by protecting undocumented immigrants over citizens
Portrays Democratic-aligned labor and immigration stances as morally justified and popular
Frames Labour Party leadership dynamics as chaotic and self-serving rather than policy-driven
Suggests internal Democratic dysfunction and lack of accountability through Hunter Biden’s grievances and Newsom’s deference
Frames Labour Party as betraying veterans through legislation
Frames Democrats as dishonest and fiscally irresponsible in budget process
Frames the Kuomintang as a reasonable, peace-seeking alternative to Taiwan’s ruling party
Frames Reform Party as internally divided, inauthentic, and compromised by its candidate's past
Implies party-aligned actors are undermining institutional integrity
Implicates California Democrats in endangering migrant children for political narrative
Associates the party with political cronyism and institutional manipulation
Associates Labour Party leadership with disciplined, patriotic, and battle-tested figures
Implies party actors may be using state mechanisms to suppress intra-party competition
Implies Republican candidates like Steve Hilton offer superior, pro-business policies without detailing them
Indirectly favors Republican-aligned actors by omitting Democratic or institutional pushback
Associates the party with sycophantic governance through the portrayal of the Kennedy Center board
Associates the Democratic Party with progressive policies that invite federal intervention
Portrays the Republican Party as engaging in exclusionary tactics to protect incumbents
Frames Democratic opposition as politically motivated rather than institutionally principled
Portrays the Green Party as institutionally failing to address antisemitism and enabling extremism
Frames the National Republican Senatorial Committee as attempting to weaponize election administration against a minor candidate
Suggests Republican figures use media appearances opportunistically for self-promotion
Subtly questions the legitimacy of legal challenges associated with Democratic appointees by foregrounding the judge's Obama affiliation
Amplifies Democratic voices framing the investigation as an attack on democracy
Portrays Republican-led political decision-making as undermining clean energy initiatives for partisan gain.
Frames Democratic Party as shifting toward punitive immigration positions, implying internal contradiction or reversal
Frames the Democratic Party as internally divided and ideologically extreme, particularly on immigration and gun rights
Suggests internal dysfunction and poor judgment in leadership choices, mocking its administrative logic
Portrays the party as internally divided and unfit for national security leadership
Portrays the party as internally fractured and failing on core governance responsibilities
Portrays the Democratic Party as exploiting racial narratives for political agitation
Suggests internal division and desperation within the Democratic Party, particularly among progressive factions
Indirectly favoring liberal political forces by reinforcing narrative of conservative leader's downfall
Portrays the Democratic Party as targeted in politically motivated violence
Framed as strategically effective in preventing progressive threat
Frames Republicans as primarily motivated by self-promotion and book sales
Republican Party framed as a resurgent, unified force under Trump's leadership
Associates red-state governance with economic success and national strength
Frames Democrats as obstructionist on national security matters
Frames Democrats as obstructing national security for partisan reasons
Suggests historical misrepresentation of economic causes eroded trust and fueled Brexit sentiment
Frames Democrats as institutionally responsible by linking their opposition to safeguarding surveillance law integrity
Portrays the Labour Party as internally divided and lacking strategic clarity in leadership selection
Frames Democratic Party figures as defending controversial candidates with minimal accountability
Portrays internal GOP divisions as damaging to party unity and electoral prospects
Portrays the Democratic Party as internally divided and prone to racially charged rhetoric
Associates the party with controversial executive actions
Emphasizes internal party divisions and potential leadership instability
Implies that the far-right Vox party is politically toxic and out of step with the pope’s moral vision
Portrays Reform Party as extremist and racially inflammatory
Portrays the party dynamics as chaotic, internally divided, and incapable of coherent national strategy
Suggests internal disarray and leadership instability within the party
Suggests GOP candidate engages in ethically ambiguous financial practices
Suggests internal disunity and weak leadership within the Labour Party
Indirect negative framing of centre-left political leadership
Frames the Labour Party as institutionally collapsing due to leadership failure and internal disarray
Suggests the SNP is a target of foreign influence due to its foreign policy stance
Suggests internal disunity and weakening leadership within the Labour Party, undermining its governance capacity.
Implies internal disarray and impending leadership crisis within the Labour Party
Portrays Labour as ideologically reckless and unfit to govern on national security
Depicts the Labour Party as internally fractured and losing credibility
Presents Reform Party's polling lead as established fact without data or context
Associates the party with internal discord over national security appointments
Depicts the Labour Party as internally divided and failing in governance
Portrays Democrats as prioritizing political ideology over public safety and responsible governance
Suggests internal division and ideological tension within the Democratic Party, particularly between progressives and establishment figures
Portrays the Labour Party as internally divided and pressured into unpopular welfare cuts
Portrays the DUP as using inflammatory rhetoric that contributes to racial tension.
Portrayed as insufficiently fighting for working-class interests
Portrays Labor as ineffective and targeted for removal by populist rhetoric