Agenda Signals / Search

Search Agenda Signals

Search for subjects across all topics.

Portrays One Nation as politically extreme and associated with fringe elements

0 +
-6

Frames NZ First as promoting exclusionary policies under the guise of protecting women

0 +
-6

Frames One Nation as a product of betrayal and theatrical politics rather than legitimate political movement

0 +
-5

Portrays party as unwelcome and disruptive

0 +
-3

Suggests the SNP is a target of foreign influence due to its foreign policy stance

0 +
-3

Portrays One Nation as a rising political force with momentum and public support

0 +
+4

Portrays the party as disruptive and associated with controversy

0 +
-4

Portrays One Nation as a populist force channeling public anger through grassroots fundraising

0 +
+7

Portrays NZ First as decisive, action-oriented, and distinct from other parties

0 +
+8

Portrays the party as barely holding on and slightly declining

0 +
-3

Portrays One Nation as a divisive force opposing national inclusivity

0 +
-6

Frames NZ First as stable despite minor dip, implicitly linked to leader's rising popularity

0 +
+5

Presents One Nation’s policy as controversial but gaining traction due to public frustration

0 +
-5

Portrays One Nation as a destabilizing and threatening force in Victorian politics

0 +
-7

Frames One Nation as a rising, legitimate political force capitalizing on mainstream failure

0 +
+6

Frames National Party voters as less supportive of strong environmental protections by highlighting that only 42 percent favor broad restrictions on bottom trawling.

0 +
-5

Undermines credibility of One Nation by associating it with political instability and speculation

0 +
-4

Portrays One Nation as divisive and unwelcome through protest emphasis and negative crowd reactions

0 +
-6

Portrayed as absurdly authoritarian and demanding ideological conformity within state institutions

0 +
-8

Frames National as hypocritical for criticizing Labour’s spending while expanding road investment and deepening the funding crisis.

0 +
-6

Portrayed as a populist threat offering slogans over solutions, undermining its credibility

0 +
-6

Portrays One Nation as exploiting public discontent for right-wing gain

0 +
-7

Associates criticism of government policy with fringe political elements, implying lack of legitimacy

0 +
-4

Portrays One Nation as gaining momentum and legitimacy through emotional appeal and rising poll numbers

0 +
+5

Portrays One Nation as a resilient, victimized political force led by a strong maternal figure

0 +
+7

Portrays One Nation as a rising and effective political force gaining momentum and public support

0 +
+5

Depicted as out of touch, enabling corporate overreach at the expense of local residents

0 +
-8

Undermines the party's credibility on reducing bureaucratic bloat by contrasting campaign promises with departmental staffing trends

0 +
-5

Framed as humorous and politically pointed

0 +
+3

Portrayed as confident and policy-focused

0 +
+3

Framed as politically savvy and assertive in highlighting Labour's absence

0 +
+3

Portrays One Nation as undemocratic and controlled by billionaire interests

0 +
-8

Portrayed as engaging in symbolic political mockery

0 +
-3

Portrays One Nation as a disruptive, high-risk political actor driven by anger and fundraising stunts rather than policy

0 +
-6

Frames One Nation as a disruptive force causing internal Coalition tension

0 +
-3

Favorably contrasted via historical precedent involving Don Brash

0 +
+3

Positively frames national self-determination as a democratic and culturally vital right, especially for small and formerly colonised nations.

0 +
+8

Portrays One Nation as a grassroots alternative with growing public support

0 +
+4

Portrays the union as hypocritical and morally compromised due to internal labour disputes

0 +
-9

Portrays One Nation as a legitimate and rising political force central to national discourse

0 +
+7

Portrays One Nation as financially irresponsible and unfit for governance

0 +
-8

Portrays One Nation's rise as a symptom of economic distress and implicitly tied to extremist alignment with Trump

0 +
-5

Frames Christian nationalism as a politicization of faith and implicitly criticizes its association with extremism

0 +
-6

Portrays National as applying a double standard on political appointments

0 +
-4