Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics.
Across Topics (44 results) — filtered
Portrays One Nation as politically extreme and associated with fringe elements
Frames NZ First as promoting exclusionary policies under the guise of protecting women
Frames One Nation as a product of betrayal and theatrical politics rather than legitimate political movement
Portrays party as unwelcome and disruptive
Suggests the SNP is a target of foreign influence due to its foreign policy stance
Portrays One Nation as a rising political force with momentum and public support
Portrays the party as disruptive and associated with controversy
Portrays One Nation as a populist force channeling public anger through grassroots fundraising
Portrays NZ First as decisive, action-oriented, and distinct from other parties
Portrays the party as barely holding on and slightly declining
Portrays One Nation as a divisive force opposing national inclusivity
Frames NZ First as stable despite minor dip, implicitly linked to leader's rising popularity
Presents One Nation’s policy as controversial but gaining traction due to public frustration
Portrays One Nation as a destabilizing and threatening force in Victorian politics
Frames One Nation as a rising, legitimate political force capitalizing on mainstream failure
Frames National Party voters as less supportive of strong environmental protections by highlighting that only 42 percent favor broad restrictions on bottom trawling.
Undermines credibility of One Nation by associating it with political instability and speculation
Portrays One Nation as divisive and unwelcome through protest emphasis and negative crowd reactions
Portrayed as absurdly authoritarian and demanding ideological conformity within state institutions
Frames National as hypocritical for criticizing Labour’s spending while expanding road investment and deepening the funding crisis.
Portrayed as a populist threat offering slogans over solutions, undermining its credibility
Portrays One Nation as exploiting public discontent for right-wing gain
Associates criticism of government policy with fringe political elements, implying lack of legitimacy
Portrays One Nation as gaining momentum and legitimacy through emotional appeal and rising poll numbers
Portrays One Nation as a resilient, victimized political force led by a strong maternal figure
Portrays One Nation as a rising and effective political force gaining momentum and public support
Depicted as out of touch, enabling corporate overreach at the expense of local residents
Undermines the party's credibility on reducing bureaucratic bloat by contrasting campaign promises with departmental staffing trends
Framed as humorous and politically pointed
Portrayed as confident and policy-focused
Framed as politically savvy and assertive in highlighting Labour's absence
Portrays One Nation as undemocratic and controlled by billionaire interests
Portrayed as engaging in symbolic political mockery
Portrays One Nation as a disruptive, high-risk political actor driven by anger and fundraising stunts rather than policy
Frames One Nation as a disruptive force causing internal Coalition tension
Favorably contrasted via historical precedent involving Don Brash
Positively frames national self-determination as a democratic and culturally vital right, especially for small and formerly colonised nations.
Portrays One Nation as a grassroots alternative with growing public support
Portrays the union as hypocritical and morally compromised due to internal labour disputes
Portrays One Nation as a legitimate and rising political force central to national discourse
Portrays One Nation as financially irresponsible and unfit for governance
Portrays One Nation's rise as a symptom of economic distress and implicitly tied to extremist alignment with Trump
Frames Christian nationalism as a politicization of faith and implicitly criticizes its association with extremism
Portrays National as applying a double standard on political appointments