Agenda Signals / Search

Search Agenda Signals

Search for subjects across all topics.

Portrays Reform UK as promoting xenophobic rhetoric and exploiting the incident for political gain

0 +
-7

Presents billionaire-led giving as noble and necessary, despite acknowledging its limitations

0 +
+6

Frames far-right political parties as amplifiers of racial division

0 +
-6

Frames the bill as a threat to trans and intersex rights rather than a neutral legislative clarification

0 +
-7

Elevates Reform UK as a voice of rational opposition to extreme climate policy

0 +
+7

Implies climate regulations will worsen financial burdens on households

0 +
-6

Frames Reform Party as internally divided, inauthentic, and compromised by its candidate's past

0 +
-8

Portrays the bill as disproportionately punitive toward women

0 +
-6

Portrays Reform UK as ideologically extreme and desperate, compromising its credibility by associating with controversial figures despite prior distancing.

0 +
-8

Portrays advocates for racial equity in justice as morally perverse and detached from facts

0 +
-8

Portrays Reform UK as dangerous and morally equivalent to fascist movements

0 +
-9

Framing constitutional protection against cruel punishment as under threat

0 +
+5

Portrays Reform Party as extremist and racially inflammatory

0 +
-7

Depicts Reform UK as chaotic, self-sabotaging, and ideologically incoherent

0 +
-8

Presents Reform Party's polling lead as established fact without data or context

0 +
+6

Frames a controversial political loyalist as a legitimate intelligence leader

0 +
+6

Reform UK is portrayed as amplifying extremism and moral panic

0 +
-7

Depicts Pulte as unqualified and politically weaponized, amplifying Democratic critiques

0 +
-9

Elevates constitutional protection against cruel and unusual punishment as a safeguard

0 +
+6

Frames Bill Gates as remorseful and victimised, downplaying accountability

0 +
+6

Frames Bill Gates as morally compromised and personally disgraced rather than focusing on institutional accountability

0 +
-8

Frames Reform UK as exploiting violence to advance an anti-immigrant agenda

0 +
-9

Frames Pulte’s appointment as controversial and underqualified, but indirectly

0 +
-7

Portrays Bill Pulte as unqualified and politically controversial

0 +
-7

Portrays Reform UK as electorally weakened and vulnerable to internal fragmentation

0 +
-8

Portrays abortion as a justified and morally defensible personal choice in the face of backlash

0 +
+8

Marginalizes gun rights supporters by presenting their views as outlier opposition to public safety measures

0 +
-3

Signals disapproval of Reform UK’s political rise by listing it as a source of personal anger

0 +
-4

Frames abortion rights as under threat due to political decisions, motivating Democratic voters

0 +
-4

Framed as a disruptive force capitalizing on discontent, with growing electoral traction

0 +
+4

Portrays Pulte as deeply unqualified and politically motivated

0 +
-9

Framed as a legitimate alternative channeling voter frustration

0 +
+5

Advocates for the expansion and passage of the Occupied Territories Bill as a necessary moral and legal action

0 +
+7

Hard-right political stance on immigration indirectly legitimized by narrative focus

0 +
+5

Reform UK's demands portrayed as legitimate political input

0 +
+5

Reform UK and its leader Nigel Farage are implicitly framed as untrustworthy by highlighting their demands for suspect identification and immigration status disclosure without evidence

0 +
-4

Reform UK framed as exploiting violence to demand hostile policy responses

0 +
-6

Framed as misrepresented and stigmatized in media, contributing to public misunderstanding

0 +
-5

Framed as effective and necessary for community safety, supported by government data and rhetoric

0 +
+4

Frames the legislation as compromised and ineffective, undermining its legal and moral authority

0 +
-5

Portrays Reform UK as champions of working people and small businesses through targeted tax policy

0 +
+8

Frames Reform UK as declining in relevance and internally unstable due to leadership avoidance

0 +
-6

Portrays the party as unserious, incompetent, and defined by personality cults rather than policy.

0 +
-9