Search Agenda Signals
Search for subjects across all topics and axes.
Across Topics (49 results) — filtered
White people framed as marginalized and victimized
Indigenous peoples are framed as historically excluded but now reasserting cultural presence
Indigenous religious practitioners are portrayed as historically excluded but now rightfully included in national identity
Implied institutional betrayal of trust with Indigenous communities
Indigenous Peoples are portrayed as excluded and disrespected
Framing Indigenous communities as rightful sovereigns and morally dignified
Indigenous Australians are framed as rightful participants in national ceremonies and deserving of respect
portrayed as rightfully included in national ceremonies
Indigenous LGBTQ+ voices framed as marginalized within broader Pride structures
Greenlandic people excluded from sovereignty discussion
framed as at risk of exclusion due to threatened treaty and water rights
portrayed as having legitimate authority and legal protection over their lands
Indigenous Peoples framed as excluded, targeted, and dehumanised
Indigenous community framed as systematically excluded and neglected by state institutions
Indigenous Peoples are framed as systematically excluded and targeted by the state
Frames Indigenous Maya communities as systematically excluded from decision-making and benefits of national development
Risk of stigmatising disabled people by associating a high-profile award with a convicted offender
Indigenous community framed as systematically excluded from equitable infrastructure investment
Indigenous communities are framed as marginalized and struggling for systemic support
Advocating for inclusion of Indigenous voices in program design and oversight
portrayed as being excluded from essential support
Disabled individuals are portrayed as beneficiaries of inclusion through accessible services, countering narratives of entitlement.
White British people are framed as excluded and victimized by systemic bias in policing
White people are portrayed as excluded and marginalized in the justice system and media response
framed as gaining political inclusion and representation through Haaland
Indigenous Peoples framed as systematically excluded and victimized
Indigenous communities are acknowledged as key stakeholders but are framed as at risk of exclusion in infrastructure planning
Aboriginal community implicitly framed as internal source of threat due to alcohol and gang-related issues
Disabled people are framed as systematically excluded from healthcare decision-making
Indigenous Peoples are framed as belonging in national commemorative spaces and deserving of respect
Disabled people portrayed as empowered and integral to democratic participation
Disabled people portrayed as fully included, empowered, and capable of political leadership and national representation
Disabled people are framed as being put at risk by proposed NDIS changes
subject portrayed as included and foundational to national identity
Indigenous survivors are framed as emotionally vulnerable and re-traumatized by the comment
Indigenous Peoples are acknowledged as having a legitimate claim to emotional and historical harm, fostering inclusion through recognition of trauma
framed as being manipulated into a victim narrative
Disabled people framed as being excluded from fundamental rights protections
Indigenous leadership and community voices are portrayed as credible, honest, and morally authoritative
Indigenous communities are portrayed as deserving of inclusion, support, and systemic attention
Indigenous children portrayed as excluded from cultural protections
framed as externally granted privilege rather than legitimate inclusion
Indigenous people excluded from equitable care
Aboriginal people are framed as historically excluded but now being recognized and included in calls for justice
framed as marginalized despite legal centrality and widespread opposition
Indigenous Peoples framed as vulnerable to exclusion in secession debate
Indigenous communities framed as taking agency and leading in the face of systemic gaps
Institutional actions are framed as potentially harmful to Indigenous language survival despite good intentions
Indigenous Peoples are portrayed as marginalized stakeholders whose interests are at risk due to institutional mismanagement