Stephen A Smith
Date Range
Score Range
Frames Smith as unserious and attention-seeking in political discourse
The article introduces the speculative idea that Smith 'needs to stand the heat if he's truly seeking political office, namely the presidency,' despite no indication from Smith that he is running. This reframes his commentary as grandstanding rather than genuine critique.
“Smith needs to stand the heat if he's truly seeking political office, namely the presidency.”
Smith is framed as excluded from legitimate discourse due to narcissism and hypocrisy
[moral_framing], [editorializing]
“These on-air pleas for the president to stay away reek of someone who genuinely believes his opinions should carry that level of weight.”
Smith is framed as dishonest and manipulative, insincerely claiming non-partisanship while actually pandering
Editorializing and loaded language are used to directly challenge Smith’s credibility, accusing him of bad faith without evidence. The article dismisses his stated rationale and labels his behavior as habitual pandering.
“And no, we don't believe Smith when he says his objection to Trump attending the game is not politically motivated. This appears to be another example of Smith pandering to his audience, as he so often does.”
portrayed as untrustworthy and betraying the Black community
Loaded language and moral judgment are used to accuse Smith of racial betrayal and advancing harmful narratives, undermining his credibility.
“you ‘betrayed your race’”