Shane Jones
Date Range
Score Range
Portrayed as a defender of national productivity against bureaucratic overreach
The article reproduces Jones's combative language toward regulators without challenge, framing him as standing up for economic efficiency and national interest.
“This is why the country’s productivity is compromised — the socks-and-sandal brigade sitting in windowless rooms in Wellington.”
Government officials portrayed as untrustworthy or morally compromised
[loaded_labels], [loaded_language]: Use of terms like 'bully', 'mini Trump wannabe', and uncritical reproduction of personal attacks imply moral failing in political figures without balancing perspectives.
“Sneering abuse from the mini Trump wannabe”
Minister portrayed as defiant and unapologetic, framing ethical breach as personal prerogative
[loaded_labels], [appeal_to_emotion]
“The meal was delicious.”
portrayed as using personal attacks and dismissive rhetoric, undermining integrity
[loaded_language] and [passive_voice_agency_obfuscation]: Reproduction of Jones's personal insult ('small appendage') and fatalistic comment on dolphin deaths without critical distancing normalises inappropriate discourse and minimises accountability.
“I thought what I was doing was actually very positive for the sustainability of the fisheries. But let's talk about the tale of the undersized fish, a little bit akin to the tale of the undersized append游戏副本 to a certain people’s biological features, namely Matt Watson’s body,” he said.”
Portrayed as disrespectful and unprofessional
[loaded_language] and [narrative_framing] — Direct quotes contain derogatory language and the article fails to sufficiently distance itself from Jones' inflammatory remarks, framing him as engaging in personal attacks rather than parliamentary debate.
“I rather fear, Mr Speaker, that hearing aids are needed for the member from Western Māori sitting to my right”
framed as deliberately provoking to deflect criticism
[editorializing], [appeal_to_emotion] — suggests Jones’ comment was deliberate and tied to mining metaphors, implying bad faith
“Which means that, unless Jones had spent a considerable number of hours down one of the mines he loves so much, he would have been well aware of the blowback Hipkins was already getting. So going there himself must have been deliberate.”
Framing Shane Jones as insensitive and requiring public apology
[sensationalism], [appeal_to_emotion]: The headline and lead emphasize the apology and personal remark about weight, framing Jones’s comment as a scandalous lapse rather than a political misstep, amplifying personal shame.
“The latest apology was swiftly issued by NZ First deputy leader Shane Jones. He appeared to comment on her weight loss earlier, when asked about her claims that NZ First could work with National.”
Framing Shane Jones as unprofessional and needing to apologise for inappropriate remarks
[framing_by_emphasis], [loaded_language]
“I dunno, maybe it's an outcome of losing too much weight, I don't know”
portraying Shane Jones as untrustworthy and racially insensitive
[editorializing] and [narrtive_framing]: The article repeatedly references past controversial statements by Jones, building a cumulative case of misconduct. This pattern, without balancing defence or policy rationale, undermines his credibility.
“In 2019, Jones told members of the Indian community to "catch the next flight home" amid a backlash over changes to partnership visa rules...”