Nicola Sturgeon
Date Range
Score Range
Sturgeon framed as politically isolated despite personal victimhood
While the article includes her emotional testimony sympathetically, it consistently positions her as under scrutiny — questioned about gift returns, linked to embezzled funds, and contrasted with institutional actors distancing themselves. This creates a subtle framing of exclusion from political protection despite personal innocence.
“Ms Sturgeon has acknowledged that some of the gifts she received from her estranged husband were bought using cash embezzled from party members.”
framed as socially and morally excluded due to association with scandal
Despite affirmations of her integrity from Humza Yousaf and her lawyer, the article's emphasis on luxury goods and political attacks frames her as someone under public suspicion and moral judgment, contributing to a sense of exclusion.
“The principle that crime should not pay must apply to Nicola Sturgeon who reaped the rewards of her husband's industrial-scale thefts over many years.”
portrayed as benefiting from corruption despite legal clearance
The article frames Sturgeon as potentially retaining goods bought with embezzled funds, using language like 'could keep items' and 'reaped the rewards' that implies moral complicity, even though she was legally cleared and described as an 'innocent third party.' This creates a perception of corruption by association.
“Nicola Sturgeon could be allowed to keep gifts bought with money stolen from the SNP by her estranged husband Peter Murrell unless the party takes legal action to recover them, according to a report”
Portrayed as personally endangered by scandal and public suspicion
Framing focuses on Sturgeon's emotional trauma and being 'deceived, misled and betrayed', positioning her as a target of fallout despite innocence.
“I feel like I am 'serving a sentence for a crime I did not commit'”
Framed as isolated and victimised by circumstances beyond her control
Repetition of the 'broken woman' description and emphasis on personal betrayal (Yousaf's quotes) frames Sturgeon as emotionally isolated and unfairly punished, despite no charges.
“I thought I saw quite a broken woman. I thought I saw somebody who was really suffering as a result of what's happened in a huge betrayal.”
Portrayed as honest and wronged, not complicit
The article heavily relies on supportive statements from Humza Yousaf and Sturgeon herself, framing her as a victim of betrayal rather than someone under legitimate scrutiny. Emotional language like 'broken woman' and 'trauma' reinforces her innocence and suffering.
“I thought I saw quite a broken woman. I thought I saw somebody who was really suffering as a result of what's happened in a huge betrayal.”
Portrayed as dishonest and manipulative, hiding behind victimhood while being complicit in financial cover-up
The article uses loaded adjectives and moral framing to depict Sturgeon as evading responsibility, shutting down inquiries, and performing victimhood. Single-source reporting and omission of her defence amplify negative portrayal.
“Ms Sturgeon saw nothing. If she was guilty of anything, it was of trusting too much.”
Framed as wronged and excluded from knowledge, evoking sympathy and distancing from scandal
[headline_body_mismatch] and [episodic_framing] centering her emotional victimhood
“I was deceived, betrayed and lied to”
framed as socially and emotionally isolated due to association with scandal
Framing by emphasis on Sturgeon's personal anguish and 'public turmoil' centers her as a figure under social strain, indirectly portraying her as excluded from public trust despite no wrongdoing.
“And then, to be in a position of such public turmoil myself, makes that even harder.”
Sturgeon is framed as wronged and excluded by betrayal, evoking sympathy
[loaded_adjectives]: Use of quoted language like 'deceived, misled and betrayed' shapes perception of victimhood.
“saying she was 'deceived, misled and betrayed'”