Lindsey Graham
Date Range
Score Range
Graham's credibility questioned through mention of past Trump criticism and personal attacks
The article references Lynch’s ad using past footage of Trump attacking Graham, implying inconsistency or opportunism, and notes Graham’s use of opponent’s criminal history, suggesting negative campaigning.
“One ad from the Lynch campaign was solely footage of Trump slamming Graham back in 2016.”
Portrays Graham as competent and credible through legislative success and presidential endorsement
Describes Graham as 'fresh off successfully advancing major legislation' and highlights Trump’s endorsement, reinforcing credibility while omitting scrutiny of spending or ethics.
“Graham is running for a fifth term in the upper chamber and is fresh off successfully advancing the GOP’s $70 billion immigration enforcement package.”
Graham portrayed as alienated from grassroots base despite elite support
[loaded_adjectives]
“Graham, who has served in the Senate since 2003 and Congress since 1995, has faced boos from South Carolina Republicans at Trump rallies in recent years.”
Graham's shifting stance framed as potentially untrustworthy or opportunistic
[loaded_verbs], [narrative_framing]
“Mr. Graham has embraced the president.”
Graham's past criticism of Trump framed as politically illegitimate or disqualifying in current GOP context
[headline_body_mismatch], [narrative_framing]
“How Lindsey Graham Has Tried to Outrun His Past Criticism of Trump”