Kamar Samuels
Date Range
Score Range
Portrays the chancellor as personally corrupt and morally bankrupt
The article uses extreme metaphor ('swimming waist-deep in... corrupt waste'), accuses Samuels of deliberate fraud, shifting blame, and rewarding loyalty, all without presenting due process or alternative explanations.
“Kamar Samuels, the city schools chancellor, is now enmeshed in a personal scandal — and a far larger systemic one.”
Portrays the chancellor as central to a cover-up and ethically compromised
Repeated emphasis on unexplained contracts, evasion of questioning, and alleged protection despite wrongdoing
“Samuels was grilled by council members, during a Monday hearing, over the contracts.”
Framed as an adversarial figure protecting himself through political power
The narrative centers on Samuels’ personal ambition and alleged manipulation of the system, using phrases like 'had designs on the chancellorship' and highlighting his reward of Graham, suggesting self-serving loyalty over accountability.
“Samuels 'had designs on the chancellorship.'”