David Sullivan
Date Range
Score Range
Frames Sullivan negatively through association with unchallenged serious allegations and loss of power, despite his denial.
[loaded_labels] and [headline_body_mismatch] — 'historic allegations of misconduct' and resignation under pressure shape a narrative of downfall.
“David Sullivan, who resigned as joint chairman last Saturday after being informed that historic allegations of misconduct were about to be published.”
David Sullivan is framed as untrustworthy and personally responsible for West Ham's collapse
The headline and repeated references to 'Sullivanism' use loaded labels and moral framing to cast Sullivan as a corrupting influence. His decisions are described with sarcasm and condemnation.
“This is David Sullivan’s mess. West Ham’s largest shareholder has listened to the wrong people, made the wrong calls and will be making the wrong choice if he clings on to power.”
portrayed as corrupt and blameworthy leader
Sullivan is directly blamed without counterpoint, described as 'shortsighted' and the source of 'his mess'. Language assigns moral failure and personal responsibility.
“This is his mess. West Ham have dropped into the Championship for the first time since 2012... and as the club’s largest shareholder and most influential individual it is Sullivan who must accept much of the blame.”