Barbara Edmonds
Date Range
Score Range
portrayed as untrustworthy and offensive
The use of 'slur' and 'error' in both headline and body frames Edmonds' comment as a moral failing rather than a rhetorical misstep in a hypothetical exercise.
“‘duck-faced horse’ slur error was made”
Edmonds framed as having made a misstep requiring apology
[loaded_labels], [proper_attribution]
“I clearly got it wrong. It wasn’t meant to be offensive and I got the question muddled. I apologise if it offended anyone”
portrayed as unprofessional and careless
While Edmonds takes accountability, the article highlights her mistake in a high-profile setting without balancing it with context about the exercise’s purpose. The lack of mention of her senior role or the event’s intent amplifies the perception of personal failure.
“I absolutely feel terrible about it, and I do apologise for any offence that it caused.”
Edmonds framed as making a reckless, offensive remark, later downplayed as a mistake
[loaded_labels], [loaded_verbs], [contextualisation]
““I clearly got it wrong”. “It wasn’t meant to be offensive and I got the question muddled. I apologise if it offended anyone,” she said.”