Downplays the significance of legal challenges to hate speech laws, framing them as distractions from moral confrontation
Sewell’s High Court challenge is mentioned only at the end and dismissed by implication; the article frames media attention on Sewell as justified, marginalizing civil liberties discourse.
“Sewell is mounting a challenge in the High Court against the government’s new hate speech laws. The White Australia Party versus The Commonwealth, according to Sewell, is the real story that deserves telling.”
