Defendants
Date Range
Score Range
Frames criminal defendants in child death cases as inherently untrustworthy
Montgomery is described as absent from his trial, with no defense witnesses called and his attorneys unresponsive. The article omits context about defense strategy (e.g., initial joinder request), reinforcing a narrative of guilt by omission.
“Montgomery, who previously professed his innocence in court, did not attend his trial and was not present when jurors returned their verdict in 2024”
Portrays the defendant negatively through unchallenged testimony and absence of defense
The article notes the defense did not respond and describes the stepmother’s damning testimony without counter-narrative, contributing to a presumption of guilt despite the conviction reversal.
“Adam Montgomery did not attend his trial in February 2022, and his lawyers called no defense witnesses.”
Excludes defendant from fair treatment by labeling him prematurely and omitting exculpatory testimony
[loaded_labels] + [omission] — Uses 'accused killer' before conviction and omits teammate testimony that Anthony was distraught and said, 'I told him not to touch me,' which supports self-defense.
“accused killer refuses to look”
defendant framed as isolated and dehumanized within the justice system
The description of Rush in solitary confinement due to media attention, combined with his unshaven appearance and lack of reaction, contributes to a framing of exclusion and isolation, even while his defense is quoted.
“She noted that her client was being held in solitary confinement due to media attention surrounding his case and said he is only allowed out for two hours a day.”
Defendants framed as inherently suspect despite presumption of innocence
[headline_body_mismatch], [loaded_language]
“Elite corporate lawyers accused of earning millions on decades-long insider trading plead not guilty”
The defendant is framed as morally outside the bounds of fairness or sympathy
The defense perspective is minimized and rendered abstract ('Life is messy'), while the prosecution’s narrative dominates with concrete, damning details. This exclusionary framing marginalizes the possibility of reasonable doubt.
““Life is messy. The truth is not always obvious,” Miedel said.”
Defendant systematically excluded from humanization and direct voice
[sympathy_appeal], [source_asymmetry]
“Mangione’s lawyers have argued that some of the evidence was obtained through unconstitutional searches and questioning during that encounter”
defendant framed as manipulative and outside norms of fair legal process
The term 'power play' in the headline frames the defense’s legal motion not as a legitimate procedural argument but as a strategic, manipulative act, contributing to the exclusion of the defendant from fair legal standing.
“judge scoffs at defense’s power play”
The defendant's legal arguments are portrayed as illegitimate and laughable
editorializing, loaded_language
“gave an absurd reason for why the CalTech grad should be allowed to walk free pending trial”
Marginalizes the suspect by focusing on preparation and danger, downplaying presumption of innocence
[cherry_picking] — The defense’s brief statement of innocence is minimally presented against overwhelming prosecutorial narrative, creating imbalance in subject’s portrayal.
“One of his lawyers, Tezira Abe, noted he had no criminal record and said he “is presumed innocent at this time”.”