Crown Prosecution Service
Date Range
Score Range
portrayed as unaccountable and unjust
The CPS is criticized for not pursuing a murder charge, which the families claim 'robbed' victims of justice. The article does not include any explanation or defense from the CPS, framing its decision as a failure of accountability.
“'That decision robbed Barnaby, Grace and Ian of justice, and it robbed us of the truth in a court of law.'”
CPS portrayed as untrustworthy and applying law unequally
Framing by emphasis and vague attribution suggest systemic bias in prosecutorial decisions, undermining institutional credibility.
“Yesterday's decision by the Crown Prosecution Service not to pursue a third trial of the brothers accused of assaulting a police officer at Manchester Airport, despite shocking CCTV footage of the incident, will hardly dispel these concerns about the law being applied unequally.”
CPS portrayed as unresponsive and failing victims
The article emphasizes emotional family reactions and uses loaded language to frame the CPS decision as a betrayal, while omitting legal justifications for not seeking extradition. The framing implies institutional failure rather than a complex legal judgment.
“The question for our own country is simpler still: who here will examine how the British state let this happen, and what it will do so that no other family goes through it?”
portrayed as failing to deliver justice
[framing_by_emphasis] and [sympathy_appeal]: The article emphasizes bereaved families' criticism of UK authorities for not pursuing domestic prosecution, framing the CPS as unwilling or unable to act despite mass fatalities.
“I am angry, but I am not surprised. For months, we have been told that the system is working and that existing measures are enough. They are not.”
CPS decision not to prosecute framed as downplaying harm and enabling leniency
The CPS’s legal conclusion is presented without explanation and contrasted with moral condemnation, implying their judgment lacks legitimacy despite proper legal reasoning.
“the CPS ruled the offence could not be prosecuted as there was no evidence Ince had been seen by anyone and so did not constitute criminality”