The AIU is framed as disrespectful and overly intrusive in its enforcement of whereabouts requirements
The article presents Kerley’s criticism of the AIU’s communication methods (e.g., spam-like calls from Mexico) and his framing of the system as invasive, which undermines its credibility without asserting misconduct.
“When the ban came down, Kerley argued he had no intention of answering phone calls that looked like spam from Mexico while he was in the U.S.”
