LGBTQ+ Community
Date Range
Score Range
LGBTQ+ community is framed as excluded and unwelcome in public institutions
[framing_by_emphasis], [appeal_to_emotion]
“LGBTQ+ themed books and materials displayed during Pride Month were “in my face.””
Framed as targeted by homophobic language
[framing_by_emphasis] The article highlights an unproven allegation of a homophobic slur without sufficient editorial distancing, potentially reinforcing stigma.
“A McDonalds security guard who denies calling a customer “a q***r” in an incident last year has claimed the man addressed him as a “black monkey””
LGBTQ+ community is being actively protected and affirmed
[editorializing] and [framing_by_emphasis]: The article amplifies moral condemnation of conversion therapy and highlights institutional support, framing LGBTQ+ identity as inherently valid and deserving of legal protection, without counter-narratives.
“Conversion practices are built on a lie, the lie that LGBTQ+ people need to be fixed, that there is something wrong with who they are. And there is, of course, nothing to fix, there is nothing to cure, and there is no one to change,” said Hadja Lahbib, the European commissioner for equality.”
portrayed as included and protected despite state-level opposition
The article highlights San Antonio's symbolic resistance through rainbow sidewalks, emphasizing community resilience and municipal support. The workaround is framed as a deliberate act of inclusion.
“We thought, How do we send the strongest possible message to the L.G.B.T.Q. community that we’re not going to be bullied, and that they can get rid of the crosswalks, but we can follow that law and paint the sidewalks instead”
LGBTQ+ community implicitly marginalized by absence of their perspective in a story about anti-LGBTQ+ conduct
[omission] failing to include any voice from the targeted individual or LGBTQ+ advocacy groups
LGBTQ+ community implicitly positioned as target of mockery
The headline labels memes as 'homophobic' without explaining how, which frames the content as hostile toward LGBTQ+ people and positions the community as vulnerable or disrespected, even without detailed evidence.
“staffer running account lampooning Luxon with homophobic and other objectionable memes”
LGBTQ+ community framed as socially disruptive and inappropriate for children
The article uses loaded language and selective quoting of anonymous online critics to position LGBTQ+ events, particularly drag performances involving teens, as controversial and morally suspect. This framing aligns with adversarial narratives often used to marginalize LGBTQ+ cultural expression.
“What kind of parent would sign-up their kids to perform in drag? These are sick people.”
Framing LGBTQ+ community as vulnerable to exclusion in sports culture
[loaded_language] and [selective_coverage]: The use of 'homophobic slur' and 'monster ban' centers the harm to LGBTQ+ identity, but without amplifying LGBTQ+ voices or protective measures, the framing emphasizes victimisation over inclusion.
“using a homophobic slur”
frames LGBTQ+ rights as subordinate to religious objections, reinforcing exclusion
[cherry_picking], [loaded_language]
“One member calls for a Presidential Medal of Freedom for a baker who refused to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.”
LGBTQ+ community acknowledged as integral to Eurovision’s identity and emotional resonance
[balanced_reporting]
“Eurovision's links to LGBTQ+ identity - both on a personal and societal level - are well-documented.”