ICC
Date Range
Score Range
ICC's legitimacy implicitly questioned through lack of response and 'secret' framing
The article notes the ICC declined to comment and describes Smotrich's claim of a 'secret' warrant, which, without strong counter-framing, allows the perception of opacity or illegitimacy to persist.
“The process of seeking warrants is confidential and must be approved by ICC judges. The court declined to comment, though it recently denied that warrants had been issued for five Israeli officials.”
ICC portrayed as a credible and legitimate institution pursuing justice
The article presents the ICC warrant as a formal, unsealed legal instrument charging serious crimes against humanity, with precise dates and scope. It is attributed properly and treated as valid by the narrative framework, contrasting with domestic denial.
“A warrant unsealed Monday by the ICC charges dela Rosa with the crime against humanity of murder of “no less than 32 persons” between July 2016 and the end of April 2018, when he led the national police force under Duterte and enforced his bloody crackdowns.”
ICC framed as an adversarial foreign power
Loaded language and framing by emphasis portray the ICC as an illegitimate external force targeting Filipinos, reinforcing nationalist resistance rather than legal cooperation.
“We should not allow another Filipino to be brought to The Hague, the second one after President Duterte”
Framed as a legitimate international actor upholding justice, despite domestic resistance
[narrative_framing], [cherry_picking]
“who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for a charge of crime against humanity”
framing the ICC as overreaching and legally questionable in its jurisdiction
[framing_by_emphasis] presents Dela Rosa’s legal argument against transfer to The Hague and notes the Philippines’ withdrawal from the Rome Statute without strong counter-framing of the ICC’s legal standing.
“Dela Rosa insists any transfer to the ICC would be illegal, as the country is no longer a signatory to the Rome Statute.”
ICC's actions framed as destabilizing and intrusive
The article frames the ICC's arrest warrant and attempted enforcement as triggering chaos and violence in a sovereign legislature, without presenting the court’s legal authority or process in detail. The omission of the warrant’s prior existence and focus on domestic disruption undermines the legitimacy of the ICC’s role.
“following a chaotic attempt to arrest a senator wanted by the International Criminal Court.”
ICC framed as an adversarial foreign entity threatening national sovereignty
Dela Rosa's appeal to 'fellow men in uniform' not to allow him to be 'handed over to foreigners' frames the ICC as an external adversary. The article includes this quote without counterbalancing pro-ICC statements, reinforcing the adversarial framing.
“Let us not allow another Filipino to be taken to The Hague.”
Framed as a legitimate international actor upholding accountability
[proper_attribution], [balanced_reporting]
“"This arrest warrant against Mr Ronald Marapon Dela Rosa was issued confidentially, under seal, by Pre-Trial Chamber I of the ICC on 6 November 2025," the ICC said in a statement.”
portrayed as hostile external actor
The framing positions the ICC as an intrusive foreign body opposing a national figure, reinforcing a 'us vs them' narrative through Dela Rosa's quote rejecting 'foreigners' jurisdiction.
““Don’t bring me to The Hague.””